From: Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Pravin B Shelar <pshelar@nicira.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/7] re-shrink 'struct page' when SLUB is on.
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 16:48:15 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52B2424F.7050406@sr71.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131218164109.5e169e258378fac44ec5212d@linux-foundation.org>
On 12/18/2013 04:41 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> > Unless somebody can find some holes in this, I think we have no choice
>> > but to unset the HAVE_ALIGNED_STRUCT_PAGE config option and revert using
>> > the cmpxchg, at least for now.
>
> So your scary patch series which shrinks struct page while retaining
> the cmpxchg_double() might reclaim most of this loss?
That's what I'll test next, but I hope so.
The config tweak is important because it shows a low-risk way to get a
small 'struct page', plus get back some performance that we lost and
evidently never noticed. A distro that was nearing a release might want
to go with this, for instance.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-19 0:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-13 23:59 Dave Hansen
2013-12-13 23:59 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/7] mm: print more details for bad_page() Dave Hansen
2013-12-16 16:52 ` Christoph Lameter
2013-12-16 17:20 ` Andi Kleen
2013-12-13 23:59 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/7] mm: page->pfmemalloc only used by slab/skb Dave Hansen
2013-12-13 23:59 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/7] mm: slabs: reset page at free Dave Hansen
2013-12-13 23:59 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/7] mm: rearrange struct page Dave Hansen
2013-12-13 23:59 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/7] mm: slub: rearrange 'struct page' fields Dave Hansen
2013-12-13 23:59 ` [RFC][PATCH 6/7] mm: slub: remove 'struct page' alignment restrictions Dave Hansen
2013-12-14 3:13 ` Andi Kleen
2013-12-13 23:59 ` [RFC][PATCH 7/7] mm: slub: cleanups after code churn Dave Hansen
2013-12-17 0:01 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/7] re-shrink 'struct page' when SLUB is on Andrew Morton
2013-12-17 0:45 ` Dave Hansen
2013-12-17 15:17 ` Christoph Lameter
2013-12-19 0:24 ` Dave Hansen
2013-12-19 0:41 ` Andrew Morton
2013-12-19 0:48 ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2013-12-19 15:21 ` Christoph Lameter
2013-12-19 19:14 ` Dave Hansen
2013-12-18 8:51 ` Pekka Enberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52B2424F.7050406@sr71.net \
--to=dave@sr71.net \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=pshelar@nicira.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox