From: Chen Gang <gang.chen@asianux.com>
To: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
uml-devel <user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
uml-user <user-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arch: um: kernel: skas: mmu: remove pmd_free() and pud_free() for failure processing in init_stub_pte()
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 10:14:36 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5285838C.6070508@asianux.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52847CD5.1030105@asianux.com>
On 11/14/2013 03:33 PM, Chen Gang wrote:
> On 11/14/2013 02:48 PM, Chen Gang wrote:
>>> >From the look of it, if an error did occur in init_stub_pte(),
>>>> then the special mapping of STUB_CODE and STUB_DATA would not
>>>> be installed, so this area would be invisible to munmap and exit,
>>>> and with your patch then the pages allocated likely to be leaked.
>>>>
>> It sounds reasonable to me: "although 'pgd' related with 'mm', but they
>> are not installed". But just like you said originally: "better get ACK
>> from some mm guys".
>>
>>
>> Hmm... is it another issue: "after STUB_CODE succeeds, but STUB_DATA
>> fails, the STUB_CODE will be leaked".
>>
>>
>>>> Which is not to say that the existing code is actually correct:
>>>> you're probably right that it's technically wrong. But it would
>>>> be very hard to get init_stub_pte() to fail, and has anyone
>>>> reported a problem with it? My guess is not, and my own
>>>> inclination to dabble here is zero.
>>>>
>> Yeah.
>>
>
> If we can not get ACK from any mm guys, and we have no enough time
> resource to read related source code, for me, I still recommend to
> remove p?d_free() in failure processing.
>
Oh, I am very sorry to Hugh and Richard, I make a mistake in common
sense: I recognized incorrect members (I treated Hugh as Richard), Hugh
is "mm guys".
Next time, I should see the mail carefully, not only for contents, but
also for senders.
Sorry again to both of you.
Thanks.
> In the worst cases, we will leak a little memory, and no any other
> negative effect, it is an executable way which is no any risks.
>
> For current mm implementation, it seems we can not assume any thing,
> although they sounds (or should be) reasonable (include what you said
> about mm).
>
>
> Thanks.
>
--
Chen Gang
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-15 2:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-15 10:34 [PATCH] mm: revert mremap pud_free anti-fix Hugh Dickins
2013-10-15 11:46 ` Chen Gang
2013-11-13 7:15 ` Chen Gang
2013-11-13 5:06 ` [PATCH] arch: um: kernel: skas: mmu: remove pmd_free() and pud_free() for failure processing in init_stub_pte() Chen Gang
2013-11-13 9:07 ` Richard Weinberger
2013-11-13 9:14 ` Chen Gang
2013-11-14 5:20 ` Hugh Dickins
2013-11-14 6:48 ` Chen Gang
2013-11-14 7:33 ` Chen Gang
2013-11-14 7:55 ` Richard Weinberger
2013-11-14 8:57 ` Chen Gang
2013-11-15 2:14 ` Chen Gang [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5285838C.6070508@asianux.com \
--to=gang.chen@asianux.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=jdike@addtoit.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=user-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox