From: Tomasz Stanislawski <t.stanislaws@samsung.com>
To: Seth Jennings <sjenning@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Bob Liu <bob.liu@oracle.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] mm: migrate zbud pages
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 19:09:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <524318DE.7070106@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130923220757.GC16191@variantweb.net>
> I just had an idea this afternoon to potentially kill both these birds with one
> stone: Replace the rbtree in zswap with an address_space.
>
> Each swap type would have its own page_tree to organize the compressed objects
> by type and offset (radix tree is more suited for this anyway) and a_ops that
> could be called by shrink_page_list() (writepage) or the migration code
> (migratepage).
>
> Then zbud pages could be put on the normal LRU list, maybe at the beginning of
> the inactive LRU so they would live for another cycle through the list, then be
> reclaimed in the normal way with the mapping->a_ops->writepage() pointing to a
> zswap_writepage() function that would decompress the pages and call
> __swap_writepage() on them.
>
> This might actually do away with the explicit pool size too as the compressed
> pool pages wouldn't be outside the control of the MM anymore.
>
> I'm just starting to explore this but I think it has promise.
>
> Seth
>
Hi Seth,
There is a problem with the proposed idea.
The radix tree used 'struct address_space' is a part of
a bigger data structure.
The radix tree is used to translate an offset to a page.
That is ok for zswap. But struct page has a field named 'index'.
The MM assumes that this index is an offset in radix tree
where one can find the page. A lot is done by MM to sustain
this consistency.
In case of zbud, there are two swap offset pointing to
the same page. There might be more if zsmalloc is used.
What is worse it is possible that one swap entry could
point to data that cross a page boundary.
Of course, one could try to modify MM to support
multiple mapping of a page in the radix tree.
But I think that MM guys will consider this as a hack
and they will not accept it.
Regards,
Tomasz Stanislawski
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-25 17:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-11 8:58 Krzysztof Kozlowski
2013-09-11 8:59 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] zbud: use page ref counter for " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2013-09-11 8:59 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] zbud: make freechunks a block local variable Krzysztof Kozlowski
2013-09-11 8:59 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] mm: use mapcount for identifying zbud pages Krzysztof Kozlowski
2013-09-11 8:59 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] mm: use indirect zbud handle and radix tree Krzysztof Kozlowski
2013-09-11 8:59 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] mm: migrate zbud pages Krzysztof Kozlowski
2013-09-17 6:59 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] " Bob Liu
2013-09-23 17:19 ` Seth Jennings
2013-09-23 22:07 ` Seth Jennings
2013-09-24 9:20 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2013-09-25 4:28 ` Bob Liu
2013-09-25 17:09 ` Tomasz Stanislawski [this message]
2013-09-25 21:57 ` Seth Jennings
2013-09-27 10:16 ` Tomasz Stanislawski
2013-09-27 22:00 ` Seth Jennings
2013-09-28 2:43 ` Bob Liu
2013-09-30 8:28 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2013-10-01 21:04 ` Seth Jennings
2013-10-03 13:24 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2013-10-03 15:39 ` Seth Jennings
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=524318DE.7070106@samsung.com \
--to=t.stanislaws@samsung.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=b.zolnierkie@samsung.com \
--cc=bob.liu@oracle.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=k.kozlowski@samsung.com \
--cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=sjenning@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox