From: "guanghui.fgh" <guanghuifeng@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, david@redhat.com, jianyong.wu@arm.com,
james.morse@arm.com, quic_qiancai@quicinc.com,
christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu, jonathan@marek.ca,
mark.rutland@arm.com, thunder.leizhen@huawei.com,
anshuman.khandual@arm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, geert+renesas@glider.be,
linux-mm@kvack.org, yaohongbo@linux.alibaba.com,
alikernel-developer@linux.alibaba.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] arm64: mm: fix linear mem mapping access performance degradation
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2022 21:17:48 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51f7c840-f892-fa98-632b-4c06b76fb32a@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YsQ07kvZX5sO2ov2@kernel.org>
在 2022/7/5 20:56, Mike Rapoport 写道:
> On Tue, Jul 05, 2022 at 01:11:16PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 05, 2022 at 08:07:07PM +0800, guanghui.fgh wrote:
>>>
>>> 1.The rodata full is harm to the performance and has been disabled in-house.
>>>
>>> 2.When using crashkernel with rodata non full, the kernel also will use non
>>> block/section mapping which cause high d-TLB miss and degrade performance
>>> greatly.
>>> This patch fix it to use block/section mapping as far as possible.
>>>
>>> bool can_set_direct_map(void)
>>> {
>>> return rodata_full || debug_pagealloc_enabled();
>>> }
>>>
>>> map_mem:
>>> if (can_set_direct_map() || IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KFENCE))
>>> flags |= NO_BLOCK_MAPPINGS | NO_CONT_MAPPINGS;
>>>
>>> 3.When rodata full is disabled, crashkernel also need protect(keep
>>> arch_kexec_[un]protect_crashkres using).
>>> I think crashkernel should't depend on radata full(Maybe other architecture
>>> don't support radata full now).
>>
>> I think this is going round in circles :/
>>
>> As a first step, can we please leave the crashkernel mapped unless
>> rodata=full? It should be a much simpler patch to write, review and maintain
>> and it gives you the performance you want when crashkernel is being used.
>
> Since we are talking about large systems, what do you think about letting
> them set CRASH_ALIGN to PUD_SIZE, then
>
> unmap(crashkernel);
> __create_pgd_mapping(crashkernel, NO_BLOCK_MAPPINGS);
>
> should be enough to make crash kernel mapped with base pages.
>
>> Will
>
Thanks.
1.When kernel boots with crashkernel, the crashkernel parameters format is:
0M-2G:0M,2G-256G:256M,256G-1024G:320M,1024G-:384M which is self-adaption
to multiple system.
2.As mentioned above, the crashkernel mem size maybe less than
PUD_SIZE(Not multiple time to PUD_SIZE).
So, maybe we also need use some non block/section mappings.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-05 13:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-02 15:57 Guanghui Feng
2022-07-04 10:35 ` Will Deacon
2022-07-04 10:58 ` guanghui.fgh
2022-07-04 11:14 ` Will Deacon
2022-07-04 12:05 ` guanghui.fgh
2022-07-04 13:15 ` Will Deacon
2022-07-04 13:41 ` guanghui.fgh
2022-07-04 14:11 ` guanghui.fgh
2022-07-04 14:23 ` Will Deacon
2022-07-04 14:34 ` guanghui.fgh
2022-07-04 16:38 ` Will Deacon
2022-07-04 17:09 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-07-05 8:35 ` Baoquan He
2022-07-05 9:52 ` Will Deacon
2022-07-05 12:07 ` guanghui.fgh
2022-07-05 12:11 ` Will Deacon
2022-07-05 12:27 ` guanghui.fgh
2022-07-05 12:56 ` Mike Rapoport
2022-07-05 13:17 ` guanghui.fgh [this message]
2022-07-05 15:02 ` Mike Rapoport
2022-07-05 15:34 ` Catalin Marinas
2022-07-05 15:57 ` Mike Rapoport
2022-07-05 17:05 ` Catalin Marinas
2022-07-05 20:45 ` Mike Rapoport
2022-07-06 2:49 ` guanghui.fgh
2022-07-06 7:43 ` Catalin Marinas
2022-07-06 10:04 ` Catalin Marinas
2022-07-06 13:54 ` Mike Rapoport
2022-07-06 15:18 ` guanghui.fgh
2022-07-06 15:30 ` guanghui.fgh
2022-07-06 15:40 ` Catalin Marinas
2022-07-07 17:02 ` guanghui.fgh
2022-07-08 12:28 ` [PATCH RESEND " guanghui.fgh
2022-07-10 13:44 ` [PATCH v5] " Guanghui Feng
2022-07-10 14:32 ` guanghui.fgh
2022-07-10 15:33 ` guanghui.fgh
2022-07-18 13:10 ` Will Deacon
2022-07-25 6:46 ` Mike Rapoport
2022-07-05 2:44 ` [PATCH v4] " guanghui.fgh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51f7c840-f892-fa98-632b-4c06b76fb32a@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=guanghuifeng@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alikernel-developer@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=jianyong.wu@arm.com \
--cc=jonathan@marek.ca \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=quic_qiancai@quicinc.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=thunder.leizhen@huawei.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yaohongbo@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox