From: jane.chu@oracle.com
To: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com>,
yazen.ghannam@amd.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, mingo@redhat.com, robin.murphy@arm.com,
Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com, bp@alien8.de, rafael@kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com,
tanxiaofei@huawei.com, mawupeng1@huawei.com, tony.luck@intel.com,
linmiaohe@huawei.com, naoya.horiguchi@nec.com,
james.morse@arm.com, tongtiangen@huawei.com,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, will@kernel.org, jarkko@kernel.org
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, justin.he@arm.com,
ardb@kernel.org, ying.huang@intel.com, ashish.kalra@amd.com,
baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, lenb@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com,
robert.moore@intel.com, lvying6@huawei.com, xiexiuqi@huawei.com,
zhuo.song@linux.alibaba.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v17 2/3] mm: memory-failure: move return value documentation to function declaration
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2024 15:37:58 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51d231c2-3659-461a-b6c3-d0e7f9fddfc1@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241202030527.20586-3-xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com>
On 12/1/2024 7:05 PM, Shuai Xue wrote:
> Part of return value comments for memory_failure() were originally
> documented at the call site. Move those comments to the function
> declaration to improve code readability and to provide developers with
> immediate access to function usage and return information.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
> Reviewed-by: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@amd.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c | 7 -------
> mm/memory-failure.c | 10 +++++++---
> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c
> index 7fb5556a0b53..d1dd7f892514 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c
> @@ -1398,13 +1398,6 @@ static void kill_me_maybe(struct callback_head *cb)
> return;
> }
>
> - /*
> - * -EHWPOISON from memory_failure() means that it already sent SIGBUS
> - * to the current process with the proper error info,
> - * -EOPNOTSUPP means hwpoison_filter() filtered the error event,
> - *
> - * In both cases, no further processing is required.
> - */
> if (ret == -EHWPOISON || ret == -EOPNOTSUPP)
> return;
>
> diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c
> index a7b8ccd29b6f..14c316d7d38d 100644
> --- a/mm/memory-failure.c
> +++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
> @@ -2211,9 +2211,13 @@ static void kill_procs_now(struct page *p, unsigned long pfn, int flags,
> * Must run in process context (e.g. a work queue) with interrupts
> * enabled and no spinlocks held.
> *
> - * Return: 0 for successfully handled the memory error,
> - * -EOPNOTSUPP for hwpoison_filter() filtered the error event,
> - * < 0(except -EOPNOTSUPP) on failure.
> + * Return:
> + * 0 - success,
> + * -ENXIO - memory not managed by the kernel
> + * -EOPNOTSUPP - hwpoison_filter() filtered the error event,
> + * -EHWPOISON - the page was already poisoned, potentially
> + * kill process,
> + * other negative values - failure.
> */
> int memory_failure(unsigned long pfn, int flags)
> {
Looks good.
Reviewed-by: Jane Chu <jane.chu@oracle.com>
-jane
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-16 23:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-02 3:05 [PATCH v17 0/3] ACPI: APEI: handle synchronous errors in task work Shuai Xue
2024-12-02 3:05 ` [PATCH v17 1/3] ACPI: APEI: send SIGBUS to current task if synchronous memory error not recovered Shuai Xue
2024-12-16 23:37 ` jane.chu
2024-12-17 1:40 ` Shuai Xue
2024-12-02 3:05 ` [PATCH v17 2/3] mm: memory-failure: move return value documentation to function declaration Shuai Xue
2024-12-16 23:37 ` jane.chu [this message]
2024-12-17 3:05 ` Shuai Xue
2024-12-02 3:05 ` [PATCH v17 3/3] ACPI: APEI: handle synchronous exceptions in task work Shuai Xue
2024-12-16 23:53 ` jane.chu
2024-12-17 1:41 ` Shuai Xue
2024-12-18 16:53 ` Yazen Ghannam
2024-12-19 1:43 ` Shuai Xue
2024-12-16 5:46 ` [PATCH v17 0/3] ACPI: APEI: handle synchronous errors " Shuai Xue
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51d231c2-3659-461a-b6c3-d0e7f9fddfc1@oracle.com \
--to=jane.chu@oracle.com \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=ashish.kalra@amd.com \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=jarkko@kernel.org \
--cc=justin.he@arm.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lvying6@huawei.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mawupeng1@huawei.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=naoya.horiguchi@nec.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=robert.moore@intel.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=tanxiaofei@huawei.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tongtiangen@huawei.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xiexiuqi@huawei.com \
--cc=xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=yazen.ghannam@amd.com \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
--cc=zhuo.song@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox