From: Tang Chen <tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: yinghai@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@elte.hu,
hpa@zytor.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, trenn@suse.de,
jiang.liu@huawei.com, wency@cn.fujitsu.com, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com,
isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com, mgorman@suse.de,
minchan@kernel.org, mina86@mina86.com, gong.chen@linux.intel.com,
vasilis.liaskovitis@profitbricks.com, lwoodman@redhat.com,
riel@redhat.com, jweiner@redhat.com, prarit@redhat.com,
x86@kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [Part1 PATCH v5 00/22] x86, ACPI, numa: Parse numa info earlier
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 11:51:52 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51C7C258.8070906@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130621182511.GA1763@htj.dyndns.org>
On 06/22/2013 02:25 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hey,
>
> On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 05:19:48PM +0800, Tang Chen wrote:
>>> * As memblock allocator can relocate itself. There's no point in
>>> avoiding setting NUMA node while parsing and registering NUMA
>>> topology. Just parse and register NUMA info and later tell it to
>>> relocate itself out of hot-pluggable node. A number of patches in
>>> the series is doing this dancing - carefully reordering NUMA
>>> probing. No need to do that. It's really fragile thing to do.
>>>
>>> * Once you get the above out of the way, I don't think there are a lot
>>> of permanent allocations in the way before NUMA is initialized.
>>> Re-order the remaining ones if that's cleaner to do. If that gets
>>> overly messy / fragile, copying them around or freeing and reloading
>>> afterwards could be an option too.
>>
>> memblock allocator can relocate itself, but it cannot relocate the memory
>
> Hmmm... maybe I wasn't clear but that's the first bullet point above.
>
>> it allocated for users. There could be some pointers pointing to these
>> memory ranges. If we do the relocation, how to update these pointers ?
>
> And the second. Can you please list what persistent areas are
> allocated before numa info is configured into memblock? There
Hi tj,
My box is x86_64, and the memory layout is:
[ 0.000000] SRAT: Node 0 PXM 0 [mem 0x00000000-0x7fffffff]
[ 0.000000] SRAT: Node 0 PXM 0 [mem 0x100000000-0x307ffffff]
[ 0.000000] SRAT: Node 1 PXM 2 [mem 0x308000000-0x587ffffff] Hot
Pluggable
[ 0.000000] SRAT: Node 2 PXM 3 [mem 0x588000000-0x7ffffffff] Hot
Pluggable
I marked ranges reserved by memblock before we parse SRAT with flag 0x4.
There are about 14 ranges which is persistent after boot.
[ 0.000000] reserved[0x0] [0x00000000000000-0x0000000000ffff],
0x10000 bytes flags: 0x4
[ 0.000000] reserved[0x1] [0x00000000093000-0x000000000fffff],
0x6d000 bytes flags: 0x4
[ 0.000000] reserved[0x2] [0x00000001000000-0x00000002a9afff],
0x1a9b000 bytes flags: 0x4
[ 0.000000] reserved[0x3] [0x00000030000000-0x00000037ffffff],
0x8000000 bytes flags: 0x4
...
[ 0.000000] reserved[0x5] [0x0000006da81000-0x0000006e46afff],
0x9ea000 bytes flags: 0x4
[ 0.000000] reserved[0x6] [0x0000006ed6a000-0x0000006f246fff],
0x4dd000 bytes flags: 0x4
[ 0.000000] reserved[0x7] [0x0000006f28a000-0x0000006f299fff],
0x10000 bytes flags: 0x4
[ 0.000000] reserved[0x8] [0x0000006f29c000-0x0000006fe91fff],
0xbf6000 bytes flags: 0x4
[ 0.000000] reserved[0x9] [0x00000070e92000-0x00000071d54fff],
0xec3000 bytes flags: 0x4
[ 0.000000] reserved[0xa] [0x00000071d5e000-0x00000072204fff],
0x4a7000 bytes flags: 0x4
[ 0.000000] reserved[0xb] [0x00000072220000-0x0000007222074f],
0x750 bytes flags: 0x4
...
[ 0.000000] reserved[0xd] [0x000000722bc000-0x000000722bc1cf],
0x1d0 bytes flags: 0x4
[ 0.000000] reserved[0xe] [0x00000072bd3000-0x00000076c8ffff],
0x40bd000 bytes flags: 0x4
......
[ 0.000000] reserved[0x134] [0x000007fffdf000-0x000007ffffffff],
0x21000 bytes flags: 0x4
Just for the readability:
[0x00000308000000-0x00000587ffffff]
Hot Pluggable
[0x00000588000000-0x000007ffffffff]
Hot Pluggable
Seeing from the dmesg, only the last one is in hotpluggable area. I need
to go
through the code to find out what it is, and find a way to relocate it.
But I'm not sure if a box with a different SRAT will have different result.
I will send more info later.
Thanks. :)
> shouldn't be whole lot. And, again, this type of information should
> have been available in the head message so that high-level discussion
> could take place right away.
>
> Thanks.
>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-24 3:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-13 13:02 Tang Chen
2013-06-13 13:02 ` [Part1 PATCH v5 01/22] x86: Change get_ramdisk_{image|size}() to global Tang Chen
2013-06-13 13:02 ` [Part1 PATCH v5 02/22] x86, microcode: Use common get_ramdisk_{image|size}() Tang Chen
2013-06-13 13:02 ` [Part1 PATCH v5 03/22] x86, ACPI, mm: Kill max_low_pfn_mapped Tang Chen
2013-06-17 21:04 ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-17 21:13 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-06-17 23:08 ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-13 13:02 ` [Part1 PATCH v5 04/22] x86, ACPI: Search buffer above 4GB in a second try for acpi initrd table override Tang Chen
2013-06-17 21:06 ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-13 13:02 ` [Part1 PATCH v5 05/22] x86, ACPI: Increase acpi initrd override tables number limit Tang Chen
2013-06-13 13:02 ` [Part1 PATCH v5 06/22] x86, ACPI: Split acpi_initrd_override() into find/copy two steps Tang Chen
2013-06-13 13:02 ` [Part1 PATCH v5 07/22] x86, ACPI: Store override acpi tables phys addr in cpio files info array Tang Chen
2013-06-17 23:38 ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-17 23:40 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-06-17 23:52 ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-13 13:02 ` [Part1 PATCH v5 08/22] x86, ACPI: Make acpi_initrd_override_find work with 32bit flat mode Tang Chen
2013-06-18 0:07 ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-13 13:02 ` [Part1 PATCH v5 09/22] x86, ACPI: Find acpi tables in initrd early from head_32.S/head64.c Tang Chen
2013-06-18 0:33 ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-13 13:02 ` [Part1 PATCH v5 10/22] x86, mm, numa: Move two functions calling on successful path later Tang Chen
2013-06-18 0:53 ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-13 13:02 ` [Part1 PATCH v5 11/22] x86, mm, numa: Call numa_meminfo_cover_memory() checking early Tang Chen
2013-06-18 1:05 ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-13 13:02 ` [Part1 PATCH v5 12/22] x86, mm, numa: Move node_map_pfn_alignment() to x86 Tang Chen
2013-06-18 1:08 ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-13 13:03 ` [Part1 PATCH v5 13/22] x86, mm, numa: Use numa_meminfo to check node_map_pfn alignment Tang Chen
2013-06-18 1:40 ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-13 13:03 ` [Part1 PATCH v5 14/22] x86, mm, numa: Set memblock nid later Tang Chen
2013-06-18 1:45 ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-13 13:03 ` [Part1 PATCH v5 15/22] x86, mm, numa: Move node_possible_map setting later Tang Chen
2013-06-13 13:03 ` [Part1 PATCH v5 16/22] x86, mm, numa: Move numa emulation handling down Tang Chen
2013-06-18 1:58 ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-18 6:22 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-06-18 7:13 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-06-19 21:25 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-06-13 13:03 ` [Part1 PATCH v5 17/22] x86, ACPI, numa, ia64: split SLIT handling out Tang Chen
2013-06-13 13:03 ` [Part1 PATCH v5 18/22] x86, mm, numa: Add early_initmem_init() stub Tang Chen
2013-06-13 13:03 ` [Part1 PATCH v5 19/22] x86, mm: Parse numa info earlier Tang Chen
2013-06-13 13:03 ` [Part1 PATCH v5 20/22] x86, mm: Add comments for step_size shift Tang Chen
2013-06-13 13:03 ` [Part1 PATCH v5 21/22] x86, mm: Make init_mem_mapping be able to be called several times Tang Chen
2013-06-13 18:35 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-06-13 22:47 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-06-14 5:08 ` Tang Chen
2013-06-13 13:03 ` [Part1 PATCH v5 22/22] x86, mm, numa: Put pagetable on local node ram for 64bit Tang Chen
2013-06-18 2:03 ` [Part1 PATCH v5 00/22] x86, ACPI, numa: Parse numa info earlier Tejun Heo
2013-06-18 5:47 ` Tang Chen
2013-06-18 17:21 ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-20 5:52 ` Tang Chen
2013-06-20 6:17 ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-21 9:19 ` Tang Chen
2013-06-21 18:25 ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-24 3:51 ` Tang Chen [this message]
2013-06-24 7:26 ` Tang Chen
2013-06-24 19:59 ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-18 17:10 ` Vasilis Liaskovitis
2013-06-18 20:19 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-06-19 10:05 ` Vasilis Liaskovitis
2013-06-20 18:42 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-06-24 9:40 ` Gu Zheng
2013-06-21 5:19 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-06-21 6:06 ` Tang Chen
2013-06-21 6:10 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-06-21 6:20 ` Tang Chen
2013-06-21 6:26 ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-21 20:18 ` Yinghai Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51C7C258.8070906@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=gong.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=jiang.liu@huawei.com \
--cc=jweiner@redhat.com \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lwoodman@redhat.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mina86@mina86.com \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=prarit@redhat.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=trenn@suse.de \
--cc=vasilis.liaskovitis@profitbricks.com \
--cc=wency@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox