linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tang Chen <tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: yinghai@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@elte.hu,
	hpa@zytor.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, trenn@suse.de,
	jiang.liu@huawei.com, wency@cn.fujitsu.com, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com,
	isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com, mgorman@suse.de,
	minchan@kernel.org, mina86@mina86.com, gong.chen@linux.intel.com,
	vasilis.liaskovitis@profitbricks.com, lwoodman@redhat.com,
	riel@redhat.com, jweiner@redhat.com, prarit@redhat.com,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [Part1 PATCH v5 00/22] x86, ACPI, numa: Parse numa info earlier
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 11:51:52 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51C7C258.8070906@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130621182511.GA1763@htj.dyndns.org>

On 06/22/2013 02:25 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hey,
>
> On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 05:19:48PM +0800, Tang Chen wrote:
>>> * As memblock allocator can relocate itself.  There's no point in
>>>    avoiding setting NUMA node while parsing and registering NUMA
>>>    topology.  Just parse and register NUMA info and later tell it to
>>>    relocate itself out of hot-pluggable node.  A number of patches in
>>>    the series is doing this dancing - carefully reordering NUMA
>>>    probing.  No need to do that.  It's really fragile thing to do.
>>>
>>> * Once you get the above out of the way, I don't think there are a lot
>>>    of permanent allocations in the way before NUMA is initialized.
>>>    Re-order the remaining ones if that's cleaner to do.  If that gets
>>>    overly messy / fragile, copying them around or freeing and reloading
>>>    afterwards could be an option too.
>>
>> memblock allocator can relocate itself, but it cannot relocate the memory
>
> Hmmm... maybe I wasn't clear but that's the first bullet point above.
>
>> it allocated for users. There could be some pointers pointing to these
>> memory ranges. If we do the relocation, how to update these pointers ?
>
> And the second.  Can you please list what persistent areas are
> allocated before numa info is configured into memblock?  There

Hi tj,

My box is x86_64, and the memory layout is:
[    0.000000] SRAT: Node 0 PXM 0 [mem 0x00000000-0x7fffffff]
[    0.000000] SRAT: Node 0 PXM 0 [mem 0x100000000-0x307ffffff]
[    0.000000] SRAT: Node 1 PXM 2 [mem 0x308000000-0x587ffffff] Hot 
Pluggable
[    0.000000] SRAT: Node 2 PXM 3 [mem 0x588000000-0x7ffffffff] Hot 
Pluggable


I marked ranges reserved by memblock before we parse SRAT with flag 0x4.
There are about 14 ranges which is persistent after boot.

[    0.000000]  reserved[0x0]   [0x00000000000000-0x0000000000ffff], 
0x10000 bytes flags: 0x4
[    0.000000]  reserved[0x1]   [0x00000000093000-0x000000000fffff], 
0x6d000 bytes flags: 0x4
[    0.000000]  reserved[0x2]   [0x00000001000000-0x00000002a9afff], 
0x1a9b000 bytes flags: 0x4
[    0.000000]  reserved[0x3]   [0x00000030000000-0x00000037ffffff], 
0x8000000 bytes flags: 0x4
...
[    0.000000]  reserved[0x5]   [0x0000006da81000-0x0000006e46afff], 
0x9ea000 bytes flags: 0x4
[    0.000000]  reserved[0x6]   [0x0000006ed6a000-0x0000006f246fff], 
0x4dd000 bytes flags: 0x4
[    0.000000]  reserved[0x7]   [0x0000006f28a000-0x0000006f299fff], 
0x10000 bytes flags: 0x4
[    0.000000]  reserved[0x8]   [0x0000006f29c000-0x0000006fe91fff], 
0xbf6000 bytes flags: 0x4
[    0.000000]  reserved[0x9]   [0x00000070e92000-0x00000071d54fff], 
0xec3000 bytes flags: 0x4
[    0.000000]  reserved[0xa]   [0x00000071d5e000-0x00000072204fff], 
0x4a7000 bytes flags: 0x4
[    0.000000]  reserved[0xb]   [0x00000072220000-0x0000007222074f], 
0x750 bytes flags: 0x4
...
[    0.000000]  reserved[0xd]   [0x000000722bc000-0x000000722bc1cf], 
0x1d0 bytes flags: 0x4
[    0.000000]  reserved[0xe]   [0x00000072bd3000-0x00000076c8ffff], 
0x40bd000 bytes flags: 0x4
......
[    0.000000]  reserved[0x134] [0x000007fffdf000-0x000007ffffffff], 
0x21000 bytes flags: 0x4


Just for the readability:
                                 [0x00000308000000-0x00000587ffffff] 
    Hot Pluggable
                                 [0x00000588000000-0x000007ffffffff] 
    Hot Pluggable

Seeing from the dmesg, only the last one is in hotpluggable area. I need 
to go
through the code to find out what it is, and find a way to relocate it.

But I'm not sure if a box with a different SRAT will have different result.

I will send more info later.

Thanks. :)


> shouldn't be whole lot.  And, again, this type of information should
> have been available in the head message so that high-level discussion
> could take place right away.
>
> Thanks.
>

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2013-06-24  3:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-06-13 13:02 Tang Chen
2013-06-13 13:02 ` [Part1 PATCH v5 01/22] x86: Change get_ramdisk_{image|size}() to global Tang Chen
2013-06-13 13:02 ` [Part1 PATCH v5 02/22] x86, microcode: Use common get_ramdisk_{image|size}() Tang Chen
2013-06-13 13:02 ` [Part1 PATCH v5 03/22] x86, ACPI, mm: Kill max_low_pfn_mapped Tang Chen
2013-06-17 21:04   ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-17 21:13     ` Yinghai Lu
2013-06-17 23:08       ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-13 13:02 ` [Part1 PATCH v5 04/22] x86, ACPI: Search buffer above 4GB in a second try for acpi initrd table override Tang Chen
2013-06-17 21:06   ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-13 13:02 ` [Part1 PATCH v5 05/22] x86, ACPI: Increase acpi initrd override tables number limit Tang Chen
2013-06-13 13:02 ` [Part1 PATCH v5 06/22] x86, ACPI: Split acpi_initrd_override() into find/copy two steps Tang Chen
2013-06-13 13:02 ` [Part1 PATCH v5 07/22] x86, ACPI: Store override acpi tables phys addr in cpio files info array Tang Chen
2013-06-17 23:38   ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-17 23:40     ` Yinghai Lu
2013-06-17 23:52   ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-13 13:02 ` [Part1 PATCH v5 08/22] x86, ACPI: Make acpi_initrd_override_find work with 32bit flat mode Tang Chen
2013-06-18  0:07   ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-13 13:02 ` [Part1 PATCH v5 09/22] x86, ACPI: Find acpi tables in initrd early from head_32.S/head64.c Tang Chen
2013-06-18  0:33   ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-13 13:02 ` [Part1 PATCH v5 10/22] x86, mm, numa: Move two functions calling on successful path later Tang Chen
2013-06-18  0:53   ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-13 13:02 ` [Part1 PATCH v5 11/22] x86, mm, numa: Call numa_meminfo_cover_memory() checking early Tang Chen
2013-06-18  1:05   ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-13 13:02 ` [Part1 PATCH v5 12/22] x86, mm, numa: Move node_map_pfn_alignment() to x86 Tang Chen
2013-06-18  1:08   ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-13 13:03 ` [Part1 PATCH v5 13/22] x86, mm, numa: Use numa_meminfo to check node_map_pfn alignment Tang Chen
2013-06-18  1:40   ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-13 13:03 ` [Part1 PATCH v5 14/22] x86, mm, numa: Set memblock nid later Tang Chen
2013-06-18  1:45   ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-13 13:03 ` [Part1 PATCH v5 15/22] x86, mm, numa: Move node_possible_map setting later Tang Chen
2013-06-13 13:03 ` [Part1 PATCH v5 16/22] x86, mm, numa: Move numa emulation handling down Tang Chen
2013-06-18  1:58   ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-18  6:22     ` Yinghai Lu
2013-06-18  7:13       ` Yinghai Lu
2013-06-19 21:25       ` Yinghai Lu
2013-06-13 13:03 ` [Part1 PATCH v5 17/22] x86, ACPI, numa, ia64: split SLIT handling out Tang Chen
2013-06-13 13:03 ` [Part1 PATCH v5 18/22] x86, mm, numa: Add early_initmem_init() stub Tang Chen
2013-06-13 13:03 ` [Part1 PATCH v5 19/22] x86, mm: Parse numa info earlier Tang Chen
2013-06-13 13:03 ` [Part1 PATCH v5 20/22] x86, mm: Add comments for step_size shift Tang Chen
2013-06-13 13:03 ` [Part1 PATCH v5 21/22] x86, mm: Make init_mem_mapping be able to be called several times Tang Chen
2013-06-13 18:35   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-06-13 22:47     ` Yinghai Lu
2013-06-14  5:08       ` Tang Chen
2013-06-13 13:03 ` [Part1 PATCH v5 22/22] x86, mm, numa: Put pagetable on local node ram for 64bit Tang Chen
2013-06-18  2:03 ` [Part1 PATCH v5 00/22] x86, ACPI, numa: Parse numa info earlier Tejun Heo
2013-06-18  5:47   ` Tang Chen
2013-06-18 17:21     ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-20  5:52       ` Tang Chen
2013-06-20  6:17         ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-21  9:19           ` Tang Chen
2013-06-21 18:25             ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-24  3:51               ` Tang Chen [this message]
2013-06-24  7:26                 ` Tang Chen
2013-06-24 19:59                   ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-18 17:10 ` Vasilis Liaskovitis
2013-06-18 20:19   ` Yinghai Lu
2013-06-19 10:05     ` Vasilis Liaskovitis
2013-06-20 18:42       ` Yinghai Lu
2013-06-24  9:40   ` Gu Zheng
2013-06-21  5:19 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-06-21  6:06   ` Tang Chen
2013-06-21  6:10     ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-06-21  6:20       ` Tang Chen
2013-06-21  6:26         ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-21 20:18   ` Yinghai Lu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51C7C258.8070906@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --to=tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=gong.chen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=jiang.liu@huawei.com \
    --cc=jweiner@redhat.com \
    --cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lwoodman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mina86@mina86.com \
    --cc=minchan@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=prarit@redhat.com \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=trenn@suse.de \
    --cc=vasilis.liaskovitis@profitbricks.com \
    --cc=wency@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox