From: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Glauber Costa <glommer@openvz.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Cgroups <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Subject: [PATCH v4 7/9] memcg: don't need to get a reference to the parent
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 09:55:20 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51BA7808.10004@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51BA7794.2000305@huawei.com>
The cgroup core guarantees it's always safe to access the parent.
v2:
- added a comment in mem_cgroup_put() as suggested by Michal
- removed mem_cgroup_get(), otherwise gcc will warn that it's not used
Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Acked-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
---
mm/memcontrol.c | 19 +++----------------
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index a63d9f1..443fb45 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -513,7 +513,6 @@ enum res_type {
*/
static DEFINE_MUTEX(memcg_create_mutex);
-static void mem_cgroup_get(struct mem_cgroup *memcg);
static void mem_cgroup_put(struct mem_cgroup *memcg);
static inline
@@ -6210,19 +6209,10 @@ static void free_rcu(struct rcu_head *rcu_head)
schedule_work(&memcg->work_freeing);
}
-static void mem_cgroup_get(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
-{
- atomic_inc(&memcg->refcnt);
-}
-
static void __mem_cgroup_put(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, int count)
{
- if (atomic_sub_and_test(count, &memcg->refcnt)) {
- struct mem_cgroup *parent = parent_mem_cgroup(memcg);
+ if (atomic_sub_and_test(count, &memcg->refcnt))
call_rcu(&memcg->rcu_freeing, free_rcu);
- if (parent)
- mem_cgroup_put(parent);
- }
}
static void mem_cgroup_put(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
@@ -6325,12 +6315,9 @@ mem_cgroup_css_online(struct cgroup *cont)
res_counter_init(&memcg->kmem, &parent->kmem);
/*
- * We increment refcnt of the parent to ensure that we can
- * safely access it on res_counter_charge/uncharge.
- * This refcnt will be decremented when freeing this
- * mem_cgroup(see mem_cgroup_put).
+ * No need to take a reference to the parent because cgroup
+ * core guarantees its existence.
*/
- mem_cgroup_get(parent);
} else {
res_counter_init(&memcg->res, NULL);
res_counter_init(&memcg->memsw, NULL);
--
1.8.0.2
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-14 1:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-14 1:53 [PATCH v4 0/9] memcg: make memcg's life cycle the same as cgroup Li Zefan
2013-06-14 1:53 ` [PATCH v4 1/9] Revert "memcg: avoid dangling reference count in creation failure." Li Zefan
2013-06-14 1:53 ` [PATCH v4 2/9] memcg, kmem: fix reference count handling on the error path Li Zefan
2013-06-14 1:54 ` [PATCH v4 3/9] memcg: use css_get() in sock_update_memcg() Li Zefan
2013-06-14 1:54 ` [PATCH v4 4/9] memcg: don't use mem_cgroup_get() when creating a kmemcg cache Li Zefan
2013-06-14 1:54 ` [PATCH v4 5/9] memcg: use css_get/put when charging/uncharging kmem Li Zefan
2013-06-28 22:59 ` Andrew Morton
2013-06-14 1:55 ` [PATCH v4 6/9] memcg: use css_get/put for swap memcg Li Zefan
2013-06-14 1:55 ` Li Zefan [this message]
2013-06-14 1:55 ` [PATCH v4 8/9] memcg: kill memcg refcnt Li Zefan
2013-06-14 1:56 ` [PATCH v4 9/9] memcg: don't need to free memcg via RCU or workqueue Li Zefan
2013-06-19 1:29 ` [PATCH v4 0/9] memcg: make memcg's life cycle the same as cgroup Li Zefan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51BA7808.10004@huawei.com \
--to=lizefan@huawei.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=glommer@openvz.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox