linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Ying Han <yinghan@google.com>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
	Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>,
	Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [patch v3 -mm 3/3] vmscan, memcg: Do softlimit reclaim also for targeted reclaim
Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 12:42:10 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51934A62.2030606@parallels.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1368431172-6844-4-git-send-email-mhocko@suse.cz>

On 05/13/2013 11:46 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> Soft reclaim has been done only for the global reclaim (both background
> and direct). Since "memcg: integrate soft reclaim tighter with zone
> shrinking code" there is no reason for this limitation anymore as the
> soft limit reclaim doesn't use any special code paths and it is a
> part of the zone shrinking code which is used by both global and
> targeted reclaims.
> 
> From semantic point of view it is even natural to consider soft limit
> before touching all groups in the hierarchy tree which is touching the
> hard limit because soft limit tells us where to push back when there is
> a  memory pressure. It is not important whether the pressure comes from
> the limit or imbalanced zones.
> 
> This patch simply enables soft reclaim unconditionally in
> mem_cgroup_should_soft_reclaim so it is enabled for both global and
> targeted reclaim paths. mem_cgroup_soft_reclaim_eligible needs to learn
> about the root of the reclaim to know where to stop checking soft limit
> state of parents up the hierarchy.
> Say we have
> A (over soft limit)
>  \
>   B (below s.l., hit the hard limit)
>  / \
> C   D (below s.l.)
> 
> B is the source of the outside memory pressure now for D but we
> shouldn't soft reclaim it because it is behaving well under B subtree
> and we can still reclaim from C (pressumably it is over the limit).
> mem_cgroup_soft_reclaim_eligible should therefore stop climbing up the
> hierarchy at B (root of the memory pressure).
> 
> Changes since v1
> - add sc->target_mem_cgroup handling into mem_cgroup_soft_reclaim_eligible
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
> ---

Reviewed-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@openvz.org>

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2013-05-15  8:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-05-13  7:46 [patch v3 0/3 -mm] Soft limit rework Michal Hocko
2013-05-13  7:46 ` [patch v3 -mm 1/3] memcg: integrate soft reclaim tighter with zone shrinking code Michal Hocko
2013-05-15  8:34   ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-16 22:12   ` Tejun Heo
2013-05-16 22:15     ` Tejun Heo
2013-05-17  7:16       ` Michal Hocko
2013-05-17  7:12     ` Michal Hocko
2013-05-17 16:02   ` Johannes Weiner
2013-05-17 16:57     ` Tejun Heo
2013-05-17 17:27       ` Johannes Weiner
2013-05-17 17:45         ` Tejun Heo
2013-05-20 14:44     ` Michal Hocko
2013-05-21  6:53       ` Michal Hocko
2013-05-27 17:13     ` Michal Hocko
2013-05-27 17:13       ` [PATCH 1/3] memcg: track children in soft limit excess to improve soft limit Michal Hocko
2013-05-27 17:13       ` [PATCH 2/3] memcg, vmscan: Do not attempt soft limit reclaim if it would not scan anything Michal Hocko
2013-05-27 17:13       ` [PATCH 3/3] memcg: Track all children over limit in the root Michal Hocko
2013-05-27 17:20       ` [PATCH] memcg: enhance memcg iterator to support predicates Michal Hocko
2013-05-29 13:05       ` [patch v3 -mm 1/3] memcg: integrate soft reclaim tighter with zone shrinking code Michal Hocko
2013-05-29 15:57         ` Michal Hocko
2013-05-29 20:01           ` Johannes Weiner
2013-05-30  8:45             ` Michal Hocko
2013-05-29 14:54       ` Michal Hocko
2013-05-30  8:36         ` Michal Hocko
2013-05-13  7:46 ` [patch v3 -mm 2/3] memcg: Get rid of soft-limit tree infrastructure Michal Hocko
2013-05-15  8:38   ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-16 22:16   ` Tejun Heo
2013-05-13  7:46 ` [patch v3 -mm 3/3] vmscan, memcg: Do softlimit reclaim also for targeted reclaim Michal Hocko
2013-05-15  8:42   ` Glauber Costa [this message]
2013-05-17  7:50     ` Michal Hocko
2013-05-16 23:12   ` Tejun Heo
2013-05-17  7:34     ` Michal Hocko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51934A62.2030606@parallels.com \
    --to=glommer@parallels.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bsingharora@gmail.com \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gthelen@google.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=walken@google.com \
    --cc=yinghan@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox