From: Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 6/7] use __remove_mapping_batch() in shrink_page_list()
Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 09:50:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51926B64.5040005@sr71.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130514160541.GX11497@suse.de>
On 05/14/2013 09:05 AM, Mel Gorman wrote:
> This helper seems overkill. Why not just have batch_mapping in
> shrink_page_list() that is set when the first page is added to the
> batch_for_mapping_removal and defer the decision to drain until after the
> page mapping has been looked up?
>
> struct address_space *batch_mapping = NULL;
>
> .....
>
> mapping = page_mapping(page);
> if (!batch_mapping)
> batch_mapping = mapping;
>
> if (!list_empty(&batch_for_mapping_removal) && mapping != batch_mapping) {
> nr_reclaimed += __remove_mapping_batch(....);
> batch_mapping = mapping;
> }
I was trying to avoid doing the batch drain while holding lock_page() on
an unrelated page. But, now that I think about it, that was probably
unsafe anyway. The page could have been truncated out of the mapping
since it *was* before lock_page().
I think I was also trying to save adding another local variable, but
you're right that it's overkill. I'll fix it up.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-14 16:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-07 21:19 [RFC][PATCH 0/7] mm: Batch page reclamation under shink_page_list Dave Hansen
2013-05-07 21:19 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/7] defer clearing of page_private() for swap cache pages Dave Hansen
2013-05-09 22:07 ` Seth Jennings
2013-05-09 22:19 ` Dave Hansen
2013-05-10 9:26 ` Michal Hocko
2013-05-10 14:01 ` Seth Jennings
2013-05-14 14:55 ` Mel Gorman
2013-05-07 21:19 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/7] make 'struct page' and swp_entry_t variants of swapcache_free() Dave Hansen
2013-05-14 15:00 ` Mel Gorman
2013-05-07 21:19 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/7] break up __remove_mapping() Dave Hansen
2013-05-14 15:22 ` Mel Gorman
2013-05-07 21:20 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/7] break out mapping "freepage" code Dave Hansen
2013-05-14 15:26 ` Mel Gorman
2013-05-07 21:20 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/7] create __remove_mapping_batch() Dave Hansen
2013-05-09 22:13 ` Seth Jennings
2013-05-09 22:18 ` Dave Hansen
2013-05-14 15:51 ` Mel Gorman
2013-05-16 17:14 ` Dave Hansen
2013-05-07 21:20 ` [RFC][PATCH 6/7] use __remove_mapping_batch() in shrink_page_list() Dave Hansen
2013-05-14 16:05 ` Mel Gorman
2013-05-14 16:50 ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2013-05-07 21:20 ` [RFC][PATCH 7/7] drain batch list during long operations Dave Hansen
2013-05-07 23:56 ` Dave Hansen
2013-05-08 0:42 ` Tim Chen
2013-05-14 16:08 ` Mel Gorman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51926B64.5040005@sr71.net \
--to=dave@sr71.net \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox