From: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
toshi.kani@hp.com, linuxram@us.ibm.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [Bug fix PATCH v3] Reusing a resource structure allocated by bootmem
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 15:46:02 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <516E452A.7060703@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1304162144320.3493@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Hi David,
2013/04/17 13:47, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Apr 2013, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
>
>>> Why not simply do what generic sparsemem support does by testing
>>> PageSlab(virt_to_head_page(res)) and calling kfree() if true and freeing
>>> back to bootmem if false? This should be like a five line patch.
>>
>> Is your explanation about free_section_usemap()?
>> If so, I don't think we can release resource structure like
>> free_section_usemap().
>
> Right, you can't release it like free_section_usemap(), but you're free to
> test for PageSlab(virt_to_head_page(res)) in kernel/resource.c.
O.K. I'll update it.
>
>> In your explanation case, memmap can be released by put_page_bootmem() in
>> free_map_bootmem() since all pages of memmap is used only for memmap.
>> But if my understanding is correct, a page of released resource structure
>> contain other purpose objects allocated by bootmem. So we cannot
>> release resource structure like free_section_usemap().
>>
>
> I'm thinking it would be much easier to just suppress the kfree() if
> !PageSlab. If you can free an entire page with free_bootmem_late(),
> that would be great,
> but I'm thinking that will take more work than it's
> worth. It seems fine to just do free_bootmem() and leave those pages as
> reserved.
I think so, too.
> How much memory are we talking about?
Hmm. I don't know correctly.
Here is kernel message of my system. The message is shown by mem_init().
--
Memory: 30491076k/33554432k available (5570k kernel code, 2274228k absent, 789128k reserved, 5667k data, 1784k init)
---
Reserved memroy size is 789128k. So part of them is freed after system boot
by memory hotplug et al.
Thanks,
Yasuaki Ishimatsu
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-17 6:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-17 0:26 Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2013-04-17 0:36 ` David Rientjes
2013-04-17 4:20 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2013-04-17 4:47 ` David Rientjes
2013-04-17 6:46 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu [this message]
2013-04-17 6:52 ` David Rientjes
2013-04-17 7:16 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=516E452A.7060703@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linuxram@us.ibm.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=toshi.kani@hp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox