From: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, rientjes@google.com, linuxram@us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [Bug fix PATCH v2] Reusing a resource structure allocated by bootmem
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 09:14:16 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <516DE958.1090200@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1366124458.3824.30.camel@misato.fc.hp.com>
2013/04/17 0:00, Toshi Kani wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-04-16 at 10:10 +0900, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
>> When hot removing memory presented at boot time, following messages are shown:
>
> :
>
>> The reason why the messages are shown is to release a resource structure,
>> allocated by bootmem, by kfree(). So when we release a resource structure,
>> we should check whether it is allocated by bootmem or not.
>>
>> But even if we know a resource structure is allocated by bootmem, we cannot
>> release it since SLxB cannot treat it. So for reusing a resource structure,
>> this patch remembers it by using bootmem_resource as follows:
>>
>> When releasing a resource structure by free_resource(), free_resource() checks
>> whether the resource structure is allocated by bootmem or not. If it is
>> allocated by bootmem, free_resource() adds it to bootmem_resource. If it is
>> not allocated by bootmem, free_resource() release it by kfree().
>>
>> And when getting a new resource structure by get_resource(), get_resource()
>> checks whether bootmem_resource has released resource structures or not. If
>> there is a released resource structure, get_resource() returns it. If there is
>> not a releaed resource structure, get_resource() returns new resource structure
>> allocated by kzalloc().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
>> ---
>> v2:
>> Based on following Toshi's works:
>> Support memory hot-delete to boot memory
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/4/10/469
>> resource: Update config option of release_mem_region_adjustable()
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/4/11/694
>> Added a NULL check into free_resource()
>> Remove __free_resource()
>
> Thanks for the update. Looks good. Can you also address Rui's comment?
Thank you for your review.
Of course I'll update Rui's comment.
Thanks,
Yasuaki Ishimatsu
>
> -Toshi
>
>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-17 0:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-16 1:10 Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2013-04-16 15:00 ` Toshi Kani
2013-04-17 0:14 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=516DE958.1090200@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linuxram@us.ibm.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=toshi.kani@hp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox