From: Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] memcg: defer page_cgroup initialization
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 01:15:52 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51643EB8.1020109@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1365499511-10923-1-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com>
(2013/04/09 18:25), Glauber Costa wrote:
> We have now reached the point in which there is no real need to allocate
> page_cgroup upon system boot. We can defer it to the first memcg
> initialization, and if it fails, we treat it like any other memcg memory
> failures (like for instance, if the mem_cgroup structure itself failed).
> In the future, we may want to defer this to the first non-root cgroup
> initialization, but we are not there yet. With that, page_cgroup can be
> more silent in its initialization.
>
> Unfortunately, doing that for flatmem models would lead to significant
> vmalloc-area waste. Since big-memory 32-bit machines are quite common,
> this would be reality for most of them. This means that we will leave
> FLATMEM alone, and fix only the SPARSEMEM case. We modify the message
> slightly so that in future reports we know precisely if this message is
> from a flatmem kernel or a older kernel initializing page_cgroup early.
>
> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>
> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
> Cc: Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
> ---
> include/linux/page_cgroup.h | 13 +++++++------
> init/main.c | 1 -
> mm/memcontrol.c | 2 ++
> mm/page_cgroup.c | 19 ++++++++-----------
> 4 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/page_cgroup.h b/include/linux/page_cgroup.h
> index 777a524..bfb43f0 100644
> --- a/include/linux/page_cgroup.h
> +++ b/include/linux/page_cgroup.h
> @@ -33,11 +33,16 @@ void __meminit pgdat_page_cgroup_init(struct pglist_data *pgdat);
> static inline void __init page_cgroup_init_flatmem(void)
> {
> }
> -extern void __init page_cgroup_init(void);
> +extern bool page_cgroup_init(void);
> #else
> void __init page_cgroup_init_flatmem(void);
> -static inline void __init page_cgroup_init(void)
> +/*
> + * If we reach here, we would have already initialized flatmem mappings.
> + * So just always succeed
> + */
> +static inline bool page_cgroup_init(void)
> {
> + return 0;
> }
> #endif
>
> @@ -94,10 +99,6 @@ static inline struct page_cgroup *lookup_page_cgroup(struct page *page)
> return NULL;
> }
>
> -static inline void page_cgroup_init(void)
> -{
> -}
> -
> static inline void __init page_cgroup_init_flatmem(void)
> {
> }
> diff --git a/init/main.c b/init/main.c
> index cee4b5c..49aa019 100644
> --- a/init/main.c
> +++ b/init/main.c
> @@ -592,7 +592,6 @@ asmlinkage void __init start_kernel(void)
> initrd_start = 0;
> }
> #endif
> - page_cgroup_init();
> debug_objects_mem_init();
> kmemleak_init();
> setup_per_cpu_pageset();
This is good.
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index f608546..59a5b1f 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -6357,6 +6357,8 @@ mem_cgroup_css_alloc(struct cgroup *cont)
> res_counter_init(&memcg->res, NULL);
> res_counter_init(&memcg->memsw, NULL);
> res_counter_init(&memcg->kmem, NULL);
> + if (page_cgroup_init())
> + goto free_out;
> }
>
> memcg->last_scanned_node = MAX_NUMNODES;
> diff --git a/mm/page_cgroup.c b/mm/page_cgroup.c
> index 6d757e3..679de38 100644
> --- a/mm/page_cgroup.c
> +++ b/mm/page_cgroup.c
> @@ -78,7 +78,8 @@ void __init page_cgroup_init_flatmem(void)
> }
> printk(KERN_INFO "allocated %ld bytes of page_cgroup\n", total_usage);
> printk(KERN_INFO "please try 'cgroup_disable=memory' option if you"
> - " don't want memory cgroups\n");
> + " don't want memory cgroups. Alternatively, use SPARSEMEM mappings"
> + " to defer initialization until actual use.");
I'm sorry that I think you don't defer initialization until actual use...yet.
page_cgroup() will allocated at initialization even if memory cgroup is not
mounted at all. Right ?
> return;
> fail:
> printk(KERN_CRIT "allocation of page_cgroup failed.\n");
> @@ -266,13 +267,13 @@ static int __meminit page_cgroup_callback(struct notifier_block *self,
>
> #endif
>
> -void __init page_cgroup_init(void)
> +bool page_cgroup_init(void)
> {
> unsigned long pfn;
> int nid;
>
> if (mem_cgroup_disabled())
> - return;
> + return 0;
>
> for_each_node_state(nid, N_MEMORY) {
> unsigned long start_pfn, end_pfn;
> @@ -299,17 +300,13 @@ void __init page_cgroup_init(void)
> if (pfn_to_nid(pfn) != nid)
> continue;
> if (init_section_page_cgroup(pfn, nid))
> - goto oom;
> + return 1;
> }
> }
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG
> hotplug_memory_notifier(page_cgroup_callback, 0);
> - printk(KERN_INFO "allocated %ld bytes of page_cgroup\n", total_usage);
> - printk(KERN_INFO "please try 'cgroup_disable=memory' option if you "
> - "don't want memory cgroups\n");
> - return;
> -oom:
> - printk(KERN_CRIT "try 'cgroup_disable=memory' boot option\n");
> - panic("Out of memory");
> +#endif
> + return 0;
IIUC, hotplug_memory_notifier() is NOP if CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG is set.
So, you don't need to add #ifdef
Thanks,
-Kame
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-09 16:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-09 9:25 Glauber Costa
2013-04-09 13:36 ` Johannes Weiner
2013-04-09 13:45 ` Glauber Costa
2013-04-09 14:06 ` Glauber Costa
2013-04-09 16:15 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51643EB8.1020109@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=glommer@parallels.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox