From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Daniel Palmer <daniel@0x0f.com>, Joshua Hahn <joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm/page_alloc: Report 1 as zone_batchsize for !CONFIG_MMU
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2025 07:39:03 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51271dc7-080e-4af6-ba00-9d5b2cd0871f@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFr9PXnK+WCOGYs_e5HiCiwxN1SdjGhmR3DOi8w0BYRqooQONA@mail.gmail.com>
On 12/18/25 04:30, Daniel Palmer wrote:
> Hi Joshua,
>
> On Thu, 18 Dec 2025 at 17:32, Joshua Hahn <joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Commit 2783088ef24e ("mm/page_alloc: prevent reporting pcp->batch = 0")
>> moved the error handling (0-handling) of zone_batchsize from its
>> callers to inside the function. However, the commit left out the error
>> handling for the NOMMU case, leading to deadlocks on NOMMU systems.
>>
>> For NOMMU systems, return 1 instead of 0 for zone_batchsize, which restores
>> the previous deadlock-free behavior.
>
> Tested this on my 68000 setup, filled the memory to cause an OOM and I
> got OOM instead of deadlock as expected.
>
> Tested-by: Daniel Palmer <daniel@thingy.jp>
>
> FWIW There was a BoF about NOMMU at LPC last week and I did mention to
> the people presenting that seem to be using NOMMU in real world
> applications that NOMMU was broken in mainline. I hoped they would
> have chimed in on this..
>
Unrelated to this problem, but I gave up testing NOMMU for arm and xtensa
because it was too difficult to maintain the toolchains for it.
Guenter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-18 15:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-18 8:31 Joshua Hahn
2025-12-18 11:23 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-12-18 12:30 ` Daniel Palmer
2025-12-18 15:39 ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2025-12-19 15:51 ` Hajime Tazaki
2025-12-18 15:39 ` Guenter Roeck
2025-12-20 2:41 ` SeongJae Park
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51271dc7-080e-4af6-ba00-9d5b2cd0871f@roeck-us.net \
--to=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=daniel@0x0f.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=jackmanb@google.com \
--cc=joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox