From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C95AC433E2 for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 12:32:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ECD5208FE for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 12:32:22 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.b="Fsi8tMgr" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 5ECD5208FE Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id A97FF6B0073; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 08:32:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id A498B6B0078; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 08:32:21 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 937D1900002; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 08:32:21 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0092.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.92]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C4116B0073 for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 08:32:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin08.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay03.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DFB68248047 for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 12:32:21 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77247089682.08.tax88_37030fb270e6 Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251]) by smtpin08.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 117FE1819E769 for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 12:32:21 +0000 (UTC) X-HE-Tag: tax88_37030fb270e6 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 7262 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) by imf32.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 12:32:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098399.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 08ACREPD090926; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 08:32:18 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=subject : to : cc : references : from : message-id : date : mime-version : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=UdKC4iFr09EHp/EEFoTiuPzvrqhtYISXi8fJ0IdZ1U4=; b=Fsi8tMgrKCaZM/lqBoa2qSpERUH5S91V3ByKmF+YAD67ZEANtVL1NA9J0ohIQIR2Y5M8 6PxDDW0pKLCscdEeChDIJZrLNKfLc1ykfCXEOFiOCnff0vsBVKlEsIANMwbhcnbnon1w JHmOHYM4oldJiWuf4myBfgLex3q2DfCd0VKuCN+LwruH/Ua0YQSM4Jyf15RSUrASIadW ABgzScRuZope//9SZkjS+8mrOPlDI1BXQp4GYQaSwnedR/KKx2/1NsYaSqMTha/3qGcF MjjHsfdnSgX0FKmP+kUj9RNMTaSPTM7BLk4yp5zvfoKYi30Tkwy16NACOdG+viy47lXK WA== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 33fkta0vhs-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 10 Sep 2020 08:32:17 -0400 Received: from m0098399.ppops.net (m0098399.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.36/8.16.0.36) with SMTP id 08ACRdDG092327; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 08:32:11 -0400 Received: from ppma02fra.de.ibm.com (47.49.7a9f.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [159.122.73.71]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 33fkta0vfk-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 10 Sep 2020 08:32:10 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma02fra.de.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma02fra.de.ibm.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 08ACVBX7011978; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 12:32:07 GMT Received: from b06avi18626390.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (b06avi18626390.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.26.192]) by ppma02fra.de.ibm.com with ESMTP id 33c2a83fse-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 10 Sep 2020 12:32:06 +0000 Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.59]) by b06avi18626390.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 08ACUU5K63570418 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 10 Sep 2020 12:30:31 GMT Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3FEDA405B; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 12:32:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F2B4A4053; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 12:32:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pomme.local (unknown [9.145.147.189]) by d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 12:32:03 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: don't rely on system state to detect hot-plug operations To: Oscar Salvador Cc: Michal Hocko , akpm@linux-foundation.org, David Hildenbrand , rafael@kernel.org, nathanl@linux.ibm.com, cheloha@linux.ibm.com, stable@vger.kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-mm@kvack.org, LKML References: <20200909074011.GD7348@dhcp22.suse.cz> <9faac1ce-c02d-7dbc-f79a-4aaaa5a73d28@linux.ibm.com> <20200909090953.GE7348@dhcp22.suse.cz> <4cdb54be-1a92-4ba4-6fee-3b415f3468a9@linux.ibm.com> <20200909105914.GF7348@dhcp22.suse.cz> <74a62b00-235e-7deb-2814-f3b240fea25e@linux.ibm.com> <20200910072331.GB28354@dhcp22.suse.cz> <31cfdf35-618f-6f56-ef16-0d999682ad02@linux.ibm.com> <20200910111246.GE28354@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20200910120343.GA6635@linux> From: Laurent Dufour Message-ID: <5104d47f-9b39-6f51-2cee-f2a153fab1df@linux.ibm.com> Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 14:32:02 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200910120343.GA6635@linux> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.235,18.0.687 definitions=2020-09-10_03:2020-09-10,2020-09-10 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 mlxscore=0 clxscore=1015 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 impostorscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 bulkscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2006250000 definitions=main-2009100112 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 117FE1819E769 X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 100.00] X-Rspamd-Server: rspam03 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: Le 10/09/2020 =C3=A0 14:03, Oscar Salvador a =C3=A9crit=C2=A0: > On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 01:35:32PM +0200, Laurent Dufour wrote: > =20 >> That points has been raised by David, quoting him here: >> >>> IIRC, ACPI can hotadd memory while SCHEDULING, this patch would break= that. >>> >>> Ccing Oscar, I think he mentioned recently that this is the case with= ACPI. >> >> Oscar told that he need to investigate further on that. >=20 > I think my reply got lost. >=20 > We can see acpi hotplugs during SYSTEM_SCHEDULING: >=20 > $QEMU -enable-kvm -machine pc -smp 4,sockets=3D4,cores=3D1,threads=3D1 = -cpu host -monitor pty \ > -m size=3D$MEM,slots=3D255,maxmem=3D4294967296k \ > -numa node,nodeid=3D0,cpus=3D0-3,mem=3D512 -numa node,nodeid=3D= 1,mem=3D512 \ > -object memory-backend-ram,id=3Dmemdimm0,size=3D134217728 -dev= ice pc-dimm,node=3D0,memdev=3Dmemdimm0,id=3Ddimm0,slot=3D0 \ > -object memory-backend-ram,id=3Dmemdimm1,size=3D134217728 -dev= ice pc-dimm,node=3D0,memdev=3Dmemdimm1,id=3Ddimm1,slot=3D1 \ > -object memory-backend-ram,id=3Dmemdimm2,size=3D134217728 -dev= ice pc-dimm,node=3D0,memdev=3Dmemdimm2,id=3Ddimm2,slot=3D2 \ > -object memory-backend-ram,id=3Dmemdimm3,size=3D134217728 -dev= ice pc-dimm,node=3D0,memdev=3Dmemdimm3,id=3Ddimm3,slot=3D3 \ > -object memory-backend-ram,id=3Dmemdimm4,size=3D134217728 -dev= ice pc-dimm,node=3D1,memdev=3Dmemdimm4,id=3Ddimm4,slot=3D4 \ > -object memory-backend-ram,id=3Dmemdimm5,size=3D134217728 -dev= ice pc-dimm,node=3D1,memdev=3Dmemdimm5,id=3Ddimm5,slot=3D5 \ > -object memory-backend-ram,id=3Dmemdimm6,size=3D134217728 -dev= ice pc-dimm,node=3D1,memdev=3Dmemdimm6,id=3Ddimm6,slot=3D6 \ >=20 > kernel: [ 0.753643] __add_memory: nid: 0 start: 0100000000 - 0108000= 000 (size: 134217728) > kernel: [ 0.756950] register_mem_sect_under_node: system_state=3D 1 >=20 > kernel: [ 0.760811] register_mem_sect_under_node+0x4f/0x230 > kernel: [ 0.760811] walk_memory_blocks+0x80/0xc0 > kernel: [ 0.760811] link_mem_sections+0x32/0x40 > kernel: [ 0.760811] add_memory_resource+0x148/0x250 > kernel: [ 0.760811] __add_memory+0x5b/0x90 > kernel: [ 0.760811] acpi_memory_device_add+0x130/0x300 > kernel: [ 0.760811] acpi_bus_attach+0x13c/0x1c0 > kernel: [ 0.760811] acpi_bus_attach+0x60/0x1c0 > kernel: [ 0.760811] acpi_bus_scan+0x33/0x70 > kernel: [ 0.760811] acpi_scan_init+0xea/0x21b > kernel: [ 0.760811] acpi_init+0x2f1/0x33c > kernel: [ 0.760811] do_one_initcall+0x46/0x1f4 Thanks Oscar!