* [PATCH] khugepaged: Reduce race probability between migration and khugepaged
@ 2025-06-30 4:48 Dev Jain
2025-06-30 7:46 ` Baolin Wang
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Dev Jain @ 2025-06-30 4:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: akpm, david
Cc: ziy, baolin.wang, lorenzo.stoakes, Liam.Howlett, npache,
ryan.roberts, baohua, linux-mm, linux-kernel, Dev Jain
Suppose a folio is under migration, and khugepaged is also trying to
collapse it. collapse_pte_mapped_thp() will retrieve the folio from the
page cache via filemap_lock_folio(), thus taking a reference on the folio
and sleeping on the folio lock, since the lock is held by the migration
path. Migration will then fail in
__folio_migrate_mapping -> folio_ref_freeze. Reduce the probability of
such a race happening (leading to migration failure) by bailing out
if we detect a PMD is marked with a migration entry.
This fixes the migration-shared-anon-thp testcase failure on Apple M3.
Note that, this is not a "fix" since it only reduces the chance of
interference of khugepaged with migration, wherein both the kernel
functionalities are deemed "best-effort".
Signed-off-by: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
---
This patch was part of
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250625055806.82645-1-dev.jain@arm.com/
but I have sent it separately on suggestion of Lorenzo, and also because
I plan to send the first two patches after David Hildenbrand's
folio_pte_batch series gets merged.
mm/khugepaged.c | 12 ++++++++++--
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/khugepaged.c b/mm/khugepaged.c
index 1aa7ca67c756..99977bb9bf6a 100644
--- a/mm/khugepaged.c
+++ b/mm/khugepaged.c
@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ enum scan_result {
SCAN_FAIL,
SCAN_SUCCEED,
SCAN_PMD_NULL,
+ SCAN_PMD_MIGRATION,
SCAN_PMD_NONE,
SCAN_PMD_MAPPED,
SCAN_EXCEED_NONE_PTE,
@@ -941,6 +942,8 @@ static inline int check_pmd_state(pmd_t *pmd)
if (pmd_none(pmde))
return SCAN_PMD_NONE;
+ if (is_pmd_migration_entry(pmde))
+ return SCAN_PMD_MIGRATION;
if (!pmd_present(pmde))
return SCAN_PMD_NULL;
if (pmd_trans_huge(pmde))
@@ -1502,9 +1505,12 @@ int collapse_pte_mapped_thp(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
!range_in_vma(vma, haddr, haddr + HPAGE_PMD_SIZE))
return SCAN_VMA_CHECK;
- /* Fast check before locking page if already PMD-mapped */
+ /*
+ * Fast check before locking folio if already PMD-mapped, or if the
+ * folio is under migration
+ */
result = find_pmd_or_thp_or_none(mm, haddr, &pmd);
- if (result == SCAN_PMD_MAPPED)
+ if (result == SCAN_PMD_MAPPED || result == SCAN_PMD_MIGRATION)
return result;
/*
@@ -2716,6 +2722,7 @@ static int madvise_collapse_errno(enum scan_result r)
case SCAN_PAGE_LRU:
case SCAN_DEL_PAGE_LRU:
case SCAN_PAGE_FILLED:
+ case SCAN_PMD_MIGRATION:
return -EAGAIN;
/*
* Other: Trying again likely not to succeed / error intrinsic to
@@ -2802,6 +2809,7 @@ int madvise_collapse(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long start,
goto handle_result;
/* Whitelisted set of results where continuing OK */
case SCAN_PMD_NULL:
+ case SCAN_PMD_MIGRATION:
case SCAN_PTE_NON_PRESENT:
case SCAN_PTE_UFFD_WP:
case SCAN_PAGE_RO:
--
2.30.2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] khugepaged: Reduce race probability between migration and khugepaged
2025-06-30 4:48 [PATCH] khugepaged: Reduce race probability between migration and khugepaged Dev Jain
@ 2025-06-30 7:46 ` Baolin Wang
2025-06-30 7:55 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-06-30 13:27 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Baolin Wang @ 2025-06-30 7:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dev Jain, akpm, david
Cc: ziy, lorenzo.stoakes, Liam.Howlett, npache, ryan.roberts, baohua,
linux-mm, linux-kernel
On 2025/6/30 12:48, Dev Jain wrote:
> Suppose a folio is under migration, and khugepaged is also trying to
> collapse it. collapse_pte_mapped_thp() will retrieve the folio from the
> page cache via filemap_lock_folio(), thus taking a reference on the folio
> and sleeping on the folio lock, since the lock is held by the migration
> path. Migration will then fail in
> __folio_migrate_mapping -> folio_ref_freeze. Reduce the probability of
> such a race happening (leading to migration failure) by bailing out
> if we detect a PMD is marked with a migration entry.
>
> This fixes the migration-shared-anon-thp testcase failure on Apple M3.
>
> Note that, this is not a "fix" since it only reduces the chance of
> interference of khugepaged with migration, wherein both the kernel
> functionalities are deemed "best-effort".
>
> Signed-off-by: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
> ---
Looks reasonable to me.
Reviewed-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] khugepaged: Reduce race probability between migration and khugepaged
2025-06-30 4:48 [PATCH] khugepaged: Reduce race probability between migration and khugepaged Dev Jain
2025-06-30 7:46 ` Baolin Wang
@ 2025-06-30 7:55 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-06-30 7:58 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-30 8:12 ` Dev Jain
2025-06-30 13:27 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2 siblings, 2 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Anshuman Khandual @ 2025-06-30 7:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dev Jain, akpm, david
Cc: ziy, baolin.wang, lorenzo.stoakes, Liam.Howlett, npache,
ryan.roberts, baohua, linux-mm, linux-kernel
On 30/06/25 10:18 AM, Dev Jain wrote:
> Suppose a folio is under migration, and khugepaged is also trying to
> collapse it. collapse_pte_mapped_thp() will retrieve the folio from the
> page cache via filemap_lock_folio(), thus taking a reference on the folio
> and sleeping on the folio lock, since the lock is held by the migration
> path. Migration will then fail in
> __folio_migrate_mapping -> folio_ref_freeze. Reduce the probability of
> such a race happening (leading to migration failure) by bailing out
> if we detect a PMD is marked with a migration entry.
Could the migration be re-attempted after such failure ? Seems like
the migration failure here is traded for a scan failure instead.
>
> This fixes the migration-shared-anon-thp testcase failure on Apple M3.
Could you please provide some more context why this test case was
failing earlier and how does this change here fixes the problem ?
>
> Note that, this is not a "fix" since it only reduces the chance of
> interference of khugepaged with migration, wherein both the kernel
> functionalities are deemed "best-effort".
> > Signed-off-by: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
> ---
>
> This patch was part of
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250625055806.82645-1-dev.jain@arm.com/
> but I have sent it separately on suggestion of Lorenzo, and also because
> I plan to send the first two patches after David Hildenbrand's
> folio_pte_batch series gets merged.
>
> mm/khugepaged.c | 12 ++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/khugepaged.c b/mm/khugepaged.c
> index 1aa7ca67c756..99977bb9bf6a 100644
> --- a/mm/khugepaged.c
> +++ b/mm/khugepaged.c
> @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ enum scan_result {
> SCAN_FAIL,
> SCAN_SUCCEED,
> SCAN_PMD_NULL,
> + SCAN_PMD_MIGRATION,
> SCAN_PMD_NONE,
> SCAN_PMD_MAPPED,
> SCAN_EXCEED_NONE_PTE,
> @@ -941,6 +942,8 @@ static inline int check_pmd_state(pmd_t *pmd)
>
> if (pmd_none(pmde))
> return SCAN_PMD_NONE;
> + if (is_pmd_migration_entry(pmde))
> + return SCAN_PMD_MIGRATION;
> if (!pmd_present(pmde))
> return SCAN_PMD_NULL;
> if (pmd_trans_huge(pmde))
> @@ -1502,9 +1505,12 @@ int collapse_pte_mapped_thp(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
> !range_in_vma(vma, haddr, haddr + HPAGE_PMD_SIZE))
> return SCAN_VMA_CHECK;
>
> - /* Fast check before locking page if already PMD-mapped */
> + /*
> + * Fast check before locking folio if already PMD-mapped, or if the
> + * folio is under migration
> + */
> result = find_pmd_or_thp_or_none(mm, haddr, &pmd);
> - if (result == SCAN_PMD_MAPPED)
> + if (result == SCAN_PMD_MAPPED || result == SCAN_PMD_MIGRATION)
Should mapped PMD and migrating PMD be treated equally while scanning ?
> return result;
>
> /*
> @@ -2716,6 +2722,7 @@ static int madvise_collapse_errno(enum scan_result r)
> case SCAN_PAGE_LRU:
> case SCAN_DEL_PAGE_LRU:
> case SCAN_PAGE_FILLED:
> + case SCAN_PMD_MIGRATION:
> return -EAGAIN;
> /*
> * Other: Trying again likely not to succeed / error intrinsic to
> @@ -2802,6 +2809,7 @@ int madvise_collapse(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long start,
> goto handle_result;
> /* Whitelisted set of results where continuing OK */
> case SCAN_PMD_NULL:
> + case SCAN_PMD_MIGRATION:
> case SCAN_PTE_NON_PRESENT:
> case SCAN_PTE_UFFD_WP:
> case SCAN_PAGE_RO:
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] khugepaged: Reduce race probability between migration and khugepaged
2025-06-30 7:55 ` Anshuman Khandual
@ 2025-06-30 7:58 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-30 8:12 ` Dev Jain
1 sibling, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: David Hildenbrand @ 2025-06-30 7:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Anshuman Khandual, Dev Jain, akpm
Cc: ziy, baolin.wang, lorenzo.stoakes, Liam.Howlett, npache,
ryan.roberts, baohua, linux-mm, linux-kernel
On 30.06.25 09:55, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> On 30/06/25 10:18 AM, Dev Jain wrote:
>> Suppose a folio is under migration, and khugepaged is also trying to
>> collapse it. collapse_pte_mapped_thp() will retrieve the folio from the
>> page cache via filemap_lock_folio(), thus taking a reference on the folio
>> and sleeping on the folio lock, since the lock is held by the migration
>> path. Migration will then fail in
>> __folio_migrate_mapping -> folio_ref_freeze. Reduce the probability of
>> such a race happening (leading to migration failure) by bailing out
>> if we detect a PMD is marked with a migration entry.
>
> Could the migration be re-attempted after such failure ? Seems like
> the migration failure here is traded for a scan failure instead.
>
>>
>> This fixes the migration-shared-anon-thp testcase failure on Apple M3.
>
> Could you please provide some more context why this test case was
> failing earlier and how does this change here fixes the problem ?
>
>>
>> Note that, this is not a "fix" since it only reduces the chance of
>> interference of khugepaged with migration, wherein both the kernel
>> functionalities are deemed "best-effort".
>>> Signed-off-by: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
>> ---
>>
>> This patch was part of
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250625055806.82645-1-dev.jain@arm.com/
>> but I have sent it separately on suggestion of Lorenzo, and also because
>> I plan to send the first two patches after David Hildenbrand's
>> folio_pte_batch series gets merged.
>>
>> mm/khugepaged.c | 12 ++++++++++--
>> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/khugepaged.c b/mm/khugepaged.c
>> index 1aa7ca67c756..99977bb9bf6a 100644
>> --- a/mm/khugepaged.c
>> +++ b/mm/khugepaged.c
>> @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ enum scan_result {
>> SCAN_FAIL,
>> SCAN_SUCCEED,
>> SCAN_PMD_NULL,
>> + SCAN_PMD_MIGRATION,
>> SCAN_PMD_NONE,
>> SCAN_PMD_MAPPED,
>> SCAN_EXCEED_NONE_PTE,
>> @@ -941,6 +942,8 @@ static inline int check_pmd_state(pmd_t *pmd)
>>
>> if (pmd_none(pmde))
>> return SCAN_PMD_NONE;
>> + if (is_pmd_migration_entry(pmde))
>> + return SCAN_PMD_MIGRATION;
>> if (!pmd_present(pmde))
>> return SCAN_PMD_NULL;
>> if (pmd_trans_huge(pmde))
>> @@ -1502,9 +1505,12 @@ int collapse_pte_mapped_thp(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
>> !range_in_vma(vma, haddr, haddr + HPAGE_PMD_SIZE))
>> return SCAN_VMA_CHECK;
>>
>> - /* Fast check before locking page if already PMD-mapped */
>> + /*
>> + * Fast check before locking folio if already PMD-mapped, or if the
>> + * folio is under migration
>> + */
>> result = find_pmd_or_thp_or_none(mm, haddr, &pmd);
>> - if (result == SCAN_PMD_MAPPED)
>> + if (result == SCAN_PMD_MAPPED || result == SCAN_PMD_MIGRATION)
> Should mapped PMD and migrating PMD be treated equally while scanning ?
Wanted to ask the same thing I think: why not simply use
SCAN_PMD_MAPPED? After all, the folio is already pmd-mapped, just not
using a present entry but (temporarily) using a migration entry.
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] khugepaged: Reduce race probability between migration and khugepaged
2025-06-30 7:55 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-06-30 7:58 ` David Hildenbrand
@ 2025-06-30 8:12 ` Dev Jain
2025-06-30 8:19 ` David Hildenbrand
1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Dev Jain @ 2025-06-30 8:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Anshuman Khandual, akpm, david
Cc: ziy, baolin.wang, lorenzo.stoakes, Liam.Howlett, npache,
ryan.roberts, baohua, linux-mm, linux-kernel
On 30/06/25 1:25 pm, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> On 30/06/25 10:18 AM, Dev Jain wrote:
>> Suppose a folio is under migration, and khugepaged is also trying to
>> collapse it. collapse_pte_mapped_thp() will retrieve the folio from the
>> page cache via filemap_lock_folio(), thus taking a reference on the folio
>> and sleeping on the folio lock, since the lock is held by the migration
>> path. Migration will then fail in
>> __folio_migrate_mapping -> folio_ref_freeze. Reduce the probability of
>> such a race happening (leading to migration failure) by bailing out
>> if we detect a PMD is marked with a migration entry.
> Could the migration be re-attempted after such failure ? Seems like
> the migration failure here is traded for a scan failure instead.
We already re-attempt migration. See NR_MAX_MIGRATE_PAGES_RETRY and
NR_MAX_MIGRATE_ASYNC_RETRY. Also just before freezing the refcount,
we do a suitable refcount check in folio_migrate_mapping(). So the
race happens after this and folio_ref_freeze() in __folio_migrate_mapping(),
therefore the window for the race is already very small in the migration
path, but large in the khugepaged path.
>
>> This fixes the migration-shared-anon-thp testcase failure on Apple M3.
> Could you please provide some more context why this test case was
> failing earlier and how does this change here fixes the problem ?
IMHO the explanation I have given in the patch description is clear
and succinct: the testcase is failing due to the race. This patch
shortens the race window, and the test on this particular hardware
does not hit the race window again.
>
>> Note that, this is not a "fix" since it only reduces the chance of
>> interference of khugepaged with migration, wherein both the kernel
>> functionalities are deemed "best-effort".
>>> Signed-off-by: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
>> ---
>>
>> This patch was part of
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250625055806.82645-1-dev.jain@arm.com/
>> but I have sent it separately on suggestion of Lorenzo, and also because
>> I plan to send the first two patches after David Hildenbrand's
>> folio_pte_batch series gets merged.
>>
>> mm/khugepaged.c | 12 ++++++++++--
>> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/khugepaged.c b/mm/khugepaged.c
>> index 1aa7ca67c756..99977bb9bf6a 100644
>> --- a/mm/khugepaged.c
>> +++ b/mm/khugepaged.c
>> @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ enum scan_result {
>> SCAN_FAIL,
>> SCAN_SUCCEED,
>> SCAN_PMD_NULL,
>> + SCAN_PMD_MIGRATION,
>> SCAN_PMD_NONE,
>> SCAN_PMD_MAPPED,
>> SCAN_EXCEED_NONE_PTE,
>> @@ -941,6 +942,8 @@ static inline int check_pmd_state(pmd_t *pmd)
>>
>> if (pmd_none(pmde))
>> return SCAN_PMD_NONE;
>> + if (is_pmd_migration_entry(pmde))
>> + return SCAN_PMD_MIGRATION;
>> if (!pmd_present(pmde))
>> return SCAN_PMD_NULL;
>> if (pmd_trans_huge(pmde))
>> @@ -1502,9 +1505,12 @@ int collapse_pte_mapped_thp(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
>> !range_in_vma(vma, haddr, haddr + HPAGE_PMD_SIZE))
>> return SCAN_VMA_CHECK;
>>
>> - /* Fast check before locking page if already PMD-mapped */
>> + /*
>> + * Fast check before locking folio if already PMD-mapped, or if the
>> + * folio is under migration
>> + */
>> result = find_pmd_or_thp_or_none(mm, haddr, &pmd);
>> - if (result == SCAN_PMD_MAPPED)
>> + if (result == SCAN_PMD_MAPPED || result == SCAN_PMD_MIGRATION)
> Should mapped PMD and migrating PMD be treated equally while scanning ?
SCAN_PMD_MAPPED is used as an indicator to change result to SCAN_SUCCEED
in khugepaged_scan_mm_slot: after the call to collapse_pte_mapped_thp. And,
it is also used in madvise_collapse() to do ++thps which is used to set the
return value of madvise_collapse. So I think this approach will be wrong.
>
>> return result;
>>
>> /*
>> @@ -2716,6 +2722,7 @@ static int madvise_collapse_errno(enum scan_result r)
>> case SCAN_PAGE_LRU:
>> case SCAN_DEL_PAGE_LRU:
>> case SCAN_PAGE_FILLED:
>> + case SCAN_PMD_MIGRATION:
>> return -EAGAIN;
>> /*
>> * Other: Trying again likely not to succeed / error intrinsic to
>> @@ -2802,6 +2809,7 @@ int madvise_collapse(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long start,
>> goto handle_result;
>> /* Whitelisted set of results where continuing OK */
>> case SCAN_PMD_NULL:
>> + case SCAN_PMD_MIGRATION:
>> case SCAN_PTE_NON_PRESENT:
>> case SCAN_PTE_UFFD_WP:
>> case SCAN_PAGE_RO:
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] khugepaged: Reduce race probability between migration and khugepaged
2025-06-30 8:12 ` Dev Jain
@ 2025-06-30 8:19 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-30 8:39 ` Dev Jain
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: David Hildenbrand @ 2025-06-30 8:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dev Jain, Anshuman Khandual, akpm
Cc: ziy, baolin.wang, lorenzo.stoakes, Liam.Howlett, npache,
ryan.roberts, baohua, linux-mm, linux-kernel
On 30.06.25 10:12, Dev Jain wrote:
>
> On 30/06/25 1:25 pm, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>> On 30/06/25 10:18 AM, Dev Jain wrote:
>>> Suppose a folio is under migration, and khugepaged is also trying to
>>> collapse it. collapse_pte_mapped_thp() will retrieve the folio from the
>>> page cache via filemap_lock_folio(), thus taking a reference on the folio
>>> and sleeping on the folio lock, since the lock is held by the migration
>>> path. Migration will then fail in
>>> __folio_migrate_mapping -> folio_ref_freeze. Reduce the probability of
>>> such a race happening (leading to migration failure) by bailing out
>>> if we detect a PMD is marked with a migration entry.
>> Could the migration be re-attempted after such failure ? Seems like
>> the migration failure here is traded for a scan failure instead.
>
> We already re-attempt migration. See NR_MAX_MIGRATE_PAGES_RETRY and
> NR_MAX_MIGRATE_ASYNC_RETRY. Also just before freezing the refcount,
> we do a suitable refcount check in folio_migrate_mapping(). So the
> race happens after this and folio_ref_freeze() in __folio_migrate_mapping(),
> therefore the window for the race is already very small in the migration
> path, but large in the khugepaged path.
>
>
>>
>>> This fixes the migration-shared-anon-thp testcase failure on Apple M3.
>> Could you please provide some more context why this test case was
>> failing earlier and how does this change here fixes the problem ?
>
> IMHO the explanation I have given in the patch description is clear
> and succinct: the testcase is failing due to the race. This patch
> shortens the race window, and the test on this particular hardware
> does not hit the race window again.
>
>>
>>> Note that, this is not a "fix" since it only reduces the chance of
>>> interference of khugepaged with migration, wherein both the kernel
>>> functionalities are deemed "best-effort".
>>>> Signed-off-by: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> This patch was part of
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250625055806.82645-1-dev.jain@arm.com/
>>> but I have sent it separately on suggestion of Lorenzo, and also because
>>> I plan to send the first two patches after David Hildenbrand's
>>> folio_pte_batch series gets merged.
>>>
>>> mm/khugepaged.c | 12 ++++++++++--
>>> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/mm/khugepaged.c b/mm/khugepaged.c
>>> index 1aa7ca67c756..99977bb9bf6a 100644
>>> --- a/mm/khugepaged.c
>>> +++ b/mm/khugepaged.c
>>> @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ enum scan_result {
>>> SCAN_FAIL,
>>> SCAN_SUCCEED,
>>> SCAN_PMD_NULL,
>>> + SCAN_PMD_MIGRATION,
>>> SCAN_PMD_NONE,
>>> SCAN_PMD_MAPPED,
>>> SCAN_EXCEED_NONE_PTE,
>>> @@ -941,6 +942,8 @@ static inline int check_pmd_state(pmd_t *pmd)
>>>
>>> if (pmd_none(pmde))
>>> return SCAN_PMD_NONE;
>>> + if (is_pmd_migration_entry(pmde))
>>> + return SCAN_PMD_MIGRATION;
>>> if (!pmd_present(pmde))
>>> return SCAN_PMD_NULL;
>>> if (pmd_trans_huge(pmde))
>>> @@ -1502,9 +1505,12 @@ int collapse_pte_mapped_thp(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
>>> !range_in_vma(vma, haddr, haddr + HPAGE_PMD_SIZE))
>>> return SCAN_VMA_CHECK;
>>>
>>> - /* Fast check before locking page if already PMD-mapped */
>>> + /*
>>> + * Fast check before locking folio if already PMD-mapped, or if the
>>> + * folio is under migration
>>> + */
>>> result = find_pmd_or_thp_or_none(mm, haddr, &pmd);
>>> - if (result == SCAN_PMD_MAPPED)
>>> + if (result == SCAN_PMD_MAPPED || result == SCAN_PMD_MIGRATION)
>> Should mapped PMD and migrating PMD be treated equally while scanning ?
>
> SCAN_PMD_MAPPED is used as an indicator to change result to SCAN_SUCCEED
> in khugepaged_scan_mm_slot: after the call to collapse_pte_mapped_thp. And,
> it is also used in madvise_collapse() to do ++thps which is used to set the
> return value of madvise_collapse. So I think this approach will be wrong.
But if it already is PMD mapped (just temporarily through a migration
entry), isn't this exactly what we want?
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] khugepaged: Reduce race probability between migration and khugepaged
2025-06-30 8:19 ` David Hildenbrand
@ 2025-06-30 8:39 ` Dev Jain
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Dev Jain @ 2025-06-30 8:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Hildenbrand, Anshuman Khandual, akpm
Cc: ziy, baolin.wang, lorenzo.stoakes, Liam.Howlett, npache,
ryan.roberts, baohua, linux-mm, linux-kernel
On 30/06/25 1:49 pm, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 30.06.25 10:12, Dev Jain wrote:
>>
>> On 30/06/25 1:25 pm, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>>> On 30/06/25 10:18 AM, Dev Jain wrote:
>>>> Suppose a folio is under migration, and khugepaged is also trying to
>>>> collapse it. collapse_pte_mapped_thp() will retrieve the folio from
>>>> the
>>>> page cache via filemap_lock_folio(), thus taking a reference on the
>>>> folio
>>>> and sleeping on the folio lock, since the lock is held by the
>>>> migration
>>>> path. Migration will then fail in
>>>> __folio_migrate_mapping -> folio_ref_freeze. Reduce the probability of
>>>> such a race happening (leading to migration failure) by bailing out
>>>> if we detect a PMD is marked with a migration entry.
>>> Could the migration be re-attempted after such failure ? Seems like
>>> the migration failure here is traded for a scan failure instead.
>>
>> We already re-attempt migration. See NR_MAX_MIGRATE_PAGES_RETRY and
>> NR_MAX_MIGRATE_ASYNC_RETRY. Also just before freezing the refcount,
>> we do a suitable refcount check in folio_migrate_mapping(). So the
>> race happens after this and folio_ref_freeze() in
>> __folio_migrate_mapping(),
>> therefore the window for the race is already very small in the migration
>> path, but large in the khugepaged path.
>>
>>>
>>>> This fixes the migration-shared-anon-thp testcase failure on Apple M3.
>>> Could you please provide some more context why this test case was
>>> failing earlier and how does this change here fixes the problem ?
>>
>> IMHO the explanation I have given in the patch description is clear
>> and succinct: the testcase is failing due to the race. This patch
>> shortens the race window, and the test on this particular hardware
>> does not hit the race window again.
>>
>>>
>>>> Note that, this is not a "fix" since it only reduces the chance of
>>>> interference of khugepaged with migration, wherein both the kernel
>>>> functionalities are deemed "best-effort".
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>> This patch was part of
>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250625055806.82645-1-dev.jain@arm.com/
>>>> but I have sent it separately on suggestion of Lorenzo, and also
>>>> because
>>>> I plan to send the first two patches after David Hildenbrand's
>>>> folio_pte_batch series gets merged.
>>>>
>>>> mm/khugepaged.c | 12 ++++++++++--
>>>> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/mm/khugepaged.c b/mm/khugepaged.c
>>>> index 1aa7ca67c756..99977bb9bf6a 100644
>>>> --- a/mm/khugepaged.c
>>>> +++ b/mm/khugepaged.c
>>>> @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ enum scan_result {
>>>> SCAN_FAIL,
>>>> SCAN_SUCCEED,
>>>> SCAN_PMD_NULL,
>>>> + SCAN_PMD_MIGRATION,
>>>> SCAN_PMD_NONE,
>>>> SCAN_PMD_MAPPED,
>>>> SCAN_EXCEED_NONE_PTE,
>>>> @@ -941,6 +942,8 @@ static inline int check_pmd_state(pmd_t *pmd)
>>>> if (pmd_none(pmde))
>>>> return SCAN_PMD_NONE;
>>>> + if (is_pmd_migration_entry(pmde))
>>>> + return SCAN_PMD_MIGRATION;
>>>> if (!pmd_present(pmde))
>>>> return SCAN_PMD_NULL;
>>>> if (pmd_trans_huge(pmde))
>>>> @@ -1502,9 +1505,12 @@ int collapse_pte_mapped_thp(struct mm_struct
>>>> *mm, unsigned long addr,
>>>> !range_in_vma(vma, haddr, haddr + HPAGE_PMD_SIZE))
>>>> return SCAN_VMA_CHECK;
>>>> - /* Fast check before locking page if already PMD-mapped */
>>>> + /*
>>>> + * Fast check before locking folio if already PMD-mapped, or
>>>> if the
>>>> + * folio is under migration
>>>> + */
>>>> result = find_pmd_or_thp_or_none(mm, haddr, &pmd);
>>>> - if (result == SCAN_PMD_MAPPED)
>>>> + if (result == SCAN_PMD_MAPPED || result == SCAN_PMD_MIGRATION)
>>> Should mapped PMD and migrating PMD be treated equally while scanning ?
>>
>> SCAN_PMD_MAPPED is used as an indicator to change result to SCAN_SUCCEED
>> in khugepaged_scan_mm_slot: after the call to
>> collapse_pte_mapped_thp. And,
>> it is also used in madvise_collapse() to do ++thps which is used to
>> set the
>> return value of madvise_collapse. So I think this approach will be
>> wrong.
>
> But if it already is PMD mapped (just temporarily through a migration
> entry), isn't this exactly what we want?
Good point. I was about to say that what about PMD-folio splitting
during migration, but then
during unmapping the folios, if we cannot migrate the PMD-folios, they
will be splitted via
unmap_folio() along with the PMD, therefore we can be sure that if we
encounter a PMD
migration entry, then eventually it will be converted to a PMD leaf
entry on migration success
or failure.
I'll merge this into SCAN_PMD_MAPPED, thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] khugepaged: Reduce race probability between migration and khugepaged
2025-06-30 4:48 [PATCH] khugepaged: Reduce race probability between migration and khugepaged Dev Jain
2025-06-30 7:46 ` Baolin Wang
2025-06-30 7:55 ` Anshuman Khandual
@ 2025-06-30 13:27 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-30 14:30 ` Dev Jain
2 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Lorenzo Stoakes @ 2025-06-30 13:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dev Jain
Cc: akpm, david, ziy, baolin.wang, Liam.Howlett, npache,
ryan.roberts, baohua, linux-mm, linux-kernel
On Mon, Jun 30, 2025 at 10:18:37AM +0530, Dev Jain wrote:
> Suppose a folio is under migration, and khugepaged is also trying to
> collapse it. collapse_pte_mapped_thp() will retrieve the folio from the
> page cache via filemap_lock_folio(), thus taking a reference on the folio
> and sleeping on the folio lock, since the lock is held by the migration
> path. Migration will then fail in
> __folio_migrate_mapping -> folio_ref_freeze. Reduce the probability of
> such a race happening (leading to migration failure) by bailing out
> if we detect a PMD is marked with a migration entry.
This is a nice find!
>
> This fixes the migration-shared-anon-thp testcase failure on Apple M3.
>
> Note that, this is not a "fix" since it only reduces the chance of
> interference of khugepaged with migration, wherein both the kernel
> functionalities are deemed "best-effort".
Thanks for separating this out, appreciated!
>
> Signed-off-by: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
> ---
>
> This patch was part of
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250625055806.82645-1-dev.jain@arm.com/
> but I have sent it separately on suggestion of Lorenzo, and also because
> I plan to send the first two patches after David Hildenbrand's
> folio_pte_batch series gets merged.
>
> mm/khugepaged.c | 12 ++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/khugepaged.c b/mm/khugepaged.c
> index 1aa7ca67c756..99977bb9bf6a 100644
> --- a/mm/khugepaged.c
> +++ b/mm/khugepaged.c
> @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ enum scan_result {
> SCAN_FAIL,
> SCAN_SUCCEED,
> SCAN_PMD_NULL,
> + SCAN_PMD_MIGRATION,
> SCAN_PMD_NONE,
> SCAN_PMD_MAPPED,
> SCAN_EXCEED_NONE_PTE,
> @@ -941,6 +942,8 @@ static inline int check_pmd_state(pmd_t *pmd)
>
> if (pmd_none(pmde))
> return SCAN_PMD_NONE;
> + if (is_pmd_migration_entry(pmde))
> + return SCAN_PMD_MIGRATION;
With David's suggestions I guess this boils down to simply adding this line.
Could we add a quick comment to explain why here?
Thanks!
> if (!pmd_present(pmde))
> return SCAN_PMD_NULL;
> if (pmd_trans_huge(pmde))
> @@ -1502,9 +1505,12 @@ int collapse_pte_mapped_thp(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
> !range_in_vma(vma, haddr, haddr + HPAGE_PMD_SIZE))
> return SCAN_VMA_CHECK;
>
> - /* Fast check before locking page if already PMD-mapped */
> + /*
> + * Fast check before locking folio if already PMD-mapped, or if the
> + * folio is under migration
> + */
> result = find_pmd_or_thp_or_none(mm, haddr, &pmd);
> - if (result == SCAN_PMD_MAPPED)
> + if (result == SCAN_PMD_MAPPED || result == SCAN_PMD_MIGRATION)
> return result;
>
> /*
> @@ -2716,6 +2722,7 @@ static int madvise_collapse_errno(enum scan_result r)
> case SCAN_PAGE_LRU:
> case SCAN_DEL_PAGE_LRU:
> case SCAN_PAGE_FILLED:
> + case SCAN_PMD_MIGRATION:
> return -EAGAIN;
> /*
> * Other: Trying again likely not to succeed / error intrinsic to
> @@ -2802,6 +2809,7 @@ int madvise_collapse(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long start,
> goto handle_result;
> /* Whitelisted set of results where continuing OK */
> case SCAN_PMD_NULL:
> + case SCAN_PMD_MIGRATION:
> case SCAN_PTE_NON_PRESENT:
> case SCAN_PTE_UFFD_WP:
> case SCAN_PAGE_RO:
> --
> 2.30.2
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] khugepaged: Reduce race probability between migration and khugepaged
2025-06-30 13:27 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
@ 2025-06-30 14:30 ` Dev Jain
2025-07-01 4:30 ` Anshuman Khandual
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Dev Jain @ 2025-06-30 14:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lorenzo Stoakes
Cc: akpm, david, ziy, baolin.wang, Liam.Howlett, npache,
ryan.roberts, baohua, linux-mm, linux-kernel
On 30/06/25 6:57 pm, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2025 at 10:18:37AM +0530, Dev Jain wrote:
>> Suppose a folio is under migration, and khugepaged is also trying to
>> collapse it. collapse_pte_mapped_thp() will retrieve the folio from the
>> page cache via filemap_lock_folio(), thus taking a reference on the folio
>> and sleeping on the folio lock, since the lock is held by the migration
>> path. Migration will then fail in
>> __folio_migrate_mapping -> folio_ref_freeze. Reduce the probability of
>> such a race happening (leading to migration failure) by bailing out
>> if we detect a PMD is marked with a migration entry.
> This is a nice find!
>
>> This fixes the migration-shared-anon-thp testcase failure on Apple M3.
>>
>> Note that, this is not a "fix" since it only reduces the chance of
>> interference of khugepaged with migration, wherein both the kernel
>> functionalities are deemed "best-effort".
> Thanks for separating this out, appreciated!
>
>> Signed-off-by: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
>> ---
>>
>> This patch was part of
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250625055806.82645-1-dev.jain@arm.com/
>> but I have sent it separately on suggestion of Lorenzo, and also because
>> I plan to send the first two patches after David Hildenbrand's
>> folio_pte_batch series gets merged.
>>
>> mm/khugepaged.c | 12 ++++++++++--
>> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/khugepaged.c b/mm/khugepaged.c
>> index 1aa7ca67c756..99977bb9bf6a 100644
>> --- a/mm/khugepaged.c
>> +++ b/mm/khugepaged.c
>> @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ enum scan_result {
>> SCAN_FAIL,
>> SCAN_SUCCEED,
>> SCAN_PMD_NULL,
>> + SCAN_PMD_MIGRATION,
>> SCAN_PMD_NONE,
>> SCAN_PMD_MAPPED,
>> SCAN_EXCEED_NONE_PTE,
>> @@ -941,6 +942,8 @@ static inline int check_pmd_state(pmd_t *pmd)
>>
>> if (pmd_none(pmde))
>> return SCAN_PMD_NONE;
>> + if (is_pmd_migration_entry(pmde))
>> + return SCAN_PMD_MIGRATION;
> With David's suggestions I guess this boils down to simply adding this line.
I think it should be
diff --git a/mm/khugepaged.c b/mm/khugepaged.c
index 1aa7ca67c756..8a6ba5c8ba4d 100644
--- a/mm/khugepaged.c
+++ b/mm/khugepaged.c
@@ -941,10 +941,10 @@ static inline int check_pmd_state(pmd_t *pmd)
if (pmd_none(pmde))
return SCAN_PMD_NONE;
+ if (is_pmd_migration_entry(pmde) || pmd_trans_huge(pmde))
+ return SCAN_PMD_MAPPED;
if (!pmd_present(pmde))
return SCAN_PMD_NULL;
- if (pmd_trans_huge(pmde))
- return SCAN_PMD_MAPPED;
if (pmd_bad(pmde))
return SCAN_PMD_NULL;
return SCAN_SUCCEED;
Moving this line above since we don't want to exit prematurely
due to !pmd_present(pmde).
>
> Could we add a quick comment to explain why here?
Sure.
>
> Thanks!
>
>> if (!pmd_present(pmde))
>> return SCAN_PMD_NULL;
>> if (pmd_trans_huge(pmde))
>> @@ -1502,9 +1505,12 @@ int collapse_pte_mapped_thp(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
>> !range_in_vma(vma, haddr, haddr + HPAGE_PMD_SIZE))
>> return SCAN_VMA_CHECK;
>>
>> - /* Fast check before locking page if already PMD-mapped */
>> + /*
>> + * Fast check before locking folio if already PMD-mapped, or if the
>> + * folio is under migration
>> + */
>> result = find_pmd_or_thp_or_none(mm, haddr, &pmd);
>> - if (result == SCAN_PMD_MAPPED)
>> + if (result == SCAN_PMD_MAPPED || result == SCAN_PMD_MIGRATION)
>> return result;
>>
>> /*
>> @@ -2716,6 +2722,7 @@ static int madvise_collapse_errno(enum scan_result r)
>> case SCAN_PAGE_LRU:
>> case SCAN_DEL_PAGE_LRU:
>> case SCAN_PAGE_FILLED:
>> + case SCAN_PMD_MIGRATION:
>> return -EAGAIN;
>> /*
>> * Other: Trying again likely not to succeed / error intrinsic to
>> @@ -2802,6 +2809,7 @@ int madvise_collapse(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long start,
>> goto handle_result;
>> /* Whitelisted set of results where continuing OK */
>> case SCAN_PMD_NULL:
>> + case SCAN_PMD_MIGRATION:
>> case SCAN_PTE_NON_PRESENT:
>> case SCAN_PTE_UFFD_WP:
>> case SCAN_PAGE_RO:
>> --
>> 2.30.2
>>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] khugepaged: Reduce race probability between migration and khugepaged
2025-06-30 14:30 ` Dev Jain
@ 2025-07-01 4:30 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-07-01 4:39 ` Dev Jain
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Anshuman Khandual @ 2025-07-01 4:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dev Jain, Lorenzo Stoakes
Cc: akpm, david, ziy, baolin.wang, Liam.Howlett, npache,
ryan.roberts, baohua, linux-mm, linux-kernel
On 30/06/25 8:00 PM, Dev Jain wrote:
>
> On 30/06/25 6:57 pm, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 30, 2025 at 10:18:37AM +0530, Dev Jain wrote:
>>> Suppose a folio is under migration, and khugepaged is also trying to
>>> collapse it. collapse_pte_mapped_thp() will retrieve the folio from the
>>> page cache via filemap_lock_folio(), thus taking a reference on the folio
>>> and sleeping on the folio lock, since the lock is held by the migration
>>> path. Migration will then fail in
>>> __folio_migrate_mapping -> folio_ref_freeze. Reduce the probability of
>>> such a race happening (leading to migration failure) by bailing out
>>> if we detect a PMD is marked with a migration entry.
>> This is a nice find!
>>
>>> This fixes the migration-shared-anon-thp testcase failure on Apple M3.
>>>
>>> Note that, this is not a "fix" since it only reduces the chance of
>>> interference of khugepaged with migration, wherein both the kernel
>>> functionalities are deemed "best-effort".
>> Thanks for separating this out, appreciated!
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> This patch was part of
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250625055806.82645-1-dev.jain@arm.com/
>>> but I have sent it separately on suggestion of Lorenzo, and also because
>>> I plan to send the first two patches after David Hildenbrand's
>>> folio_pte_batch series gets merged.
>>>
>>> mm/khugepaged.c | 12 ++++++++++--
>>> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/mm/khugepaged.c b/mm/khugepaged.c
>>> index 1aa7ca67c756..99977bb9bf6a 100644
>>> --- a/mm/khugepaged.c
>>> +++ b/mm/khugepaged.c
>>> @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ enum scan_result {
>>> SCAN_FAIL,
>>> SCAN_SUCCEED,
>>> SCAN_PMD_NULL,
>>> + SCAN_PMD_MIGRATION,
>>> SCAN_PMD_NONE,
>>> SCAN_PMD_MAPPED,
>>> SCAN_EXCEED_NONE_PTE,
>>> @@ -941,6 +942,8 @@ static inline int check_pmd_state(pmd_t *pmd)
>>>
>>> if (pmd_none(pmde))
>>> return SCAN_PMD_NONE;
>>> + if (is_pmd_migration_entry(pmde))
>>> + return SCAN_PMD_MIGRATION;
>> With David's suggestions I guess this boils down to simply adding this line.
>
> I think it should be
>
> diff --git a/mm/khugepaged.c b/mm/khugepaged.c
> index 1aa7ca67c756..8a6ba5c8ba4d 100644
> --- a/mm/khugepaged.c
> +++ b/mm/khugepaged.c
> @@ -941,10 +941,10 @@ static inline int check_pmd_state(pmd_t *pmd)
>
> if (pmd_none(pmde))
> return SCAN_PMD_NONE;
> + if (is_pmd_migration_entry(pmde) || pmd_trans_huge(pmde))
> + return SCAN_PMD_MAPPED;
> if (!pmd_present(pmde))
> return SCAN_PMD_NULL;
> - if (pmd_trans_huge(pmde))
> - return SCAN_PMD_MAPPED;
> if (pmd_bad(pmde))
> return SCAN_PMD_NULL;
> return SCAN_SUCCEED;
>
> Moving this line above since we don't want to exit prematurely
> due to !pmd_present(pmde).
Might be cleaner to just add the migration test separately before
the pmd_present() and without modifying existing pmd_trans_huge().
if (is_pmd_migration_entry(pmde))
return SCAN_PMD_MAPPED;
>
>
>>
>> Could we add a quick comment to explain why here?
>
> Sure.
>
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>>> if (!pmd_present(pmde))
>>> return SCAN_PMD_NULL;
>>> if (pmd_trans_huge(pmde))
>>> @@ -1502,9 +1505,12 @@ int collapse_pte_mapped_thp(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
>>> !range_in_vma(vma, haddr, haddr + HPAGE_PMD_SIZE))
>>> return SCAN_VMA_CHECK;
>>>
>>> - /* Fast check before locking page if already PMD-mapped */
>>> + /*
>>> + * Fast check before locking folio if already PMD-mapped, or if the
>>> + * folio is under migration
>>> + */
>>> result = find_pmd_or_thp_or_none(mm, haddr, &pmd);
>>> - if (result == SCAN_PMD_MAPPED)
>>> + if (result == SCAN_PMD_MAPPED || result == SCAN_PMD_MIGRATION)
>>> return result;
>>>
>>> /*
>>> @@ -2716,6 +2722,7 @@ static int madvise_collapse_errno(enum scan_result r)
>>> case SCAN_PAGE_LRU:
>>> case SCAN_DEL_PAGE_LRU:
>>> case SCAN_PAGE_FILLED:
>>> + case SCAN_PMD_MIGRATION:
>>> return -EAGAIN;
>>> /*
>>> * Other: Trying again likely not to succeed / error intrinsic to
>>> @@ -2802,6 +2809,7 @@ int madvise_collapse(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long start,
>>> goto handle_result;
>>> /* Whitelisted set of results where continuing OK */
>>> case SCAN_PMD_NULL:
>>> + case SCAN_PMD_MIGRATION:
>>> case SCAN_PTE_NON_PRESENT:
>>> case SCAN_PTE_UFFD_WP:
>>> case SCAN_PAGE_RO:
>>> --
>>> 2.30.2
>>>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] khugepaged: Reduce race probability between migration and khugepaged
2025-07-01 4:30 ` Anshuman Khandual
@ 2025-07-01 4:39 ` Dev Jain
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Dev Jain @ 2025-07-01 4:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Anshuman Khandual, Lorenzo Stoakes
Cc: akpm, david, ziy, baolin.wang, Liam.Howlett, npache,
ryan.roberts, baohua, linux-mm, linux-kernel
On 01/07/25 10:00 am, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>
> On 30/06/25 8:00 PM, Dev Jain wrote:
>> On 30/06/25 6:57 pm, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 30, 2025 at 10:18:37AM +0530, Dev Jain wrote:
>>>> Suppose a folio is under migration, and khugepaged is also trying to
>>>> collapse it. collapse_pte_mapped_thp() will retrieve the folio from the
>>>> page cache via filemap_lock_folio(), thus taking a reference on the folio
>>>> and sleeping on the folio lock, since the lock is held by the migration
>>>> path. Migration will then fail in
>>>> __folio_migrate_mapping -> folio_ref_freeze. Reduce the probability of
>>>> such a race happening (leading to migration failure) by bailing out
>>>> if we detect a PMD is marked with a migration entry.
>>> This is a nice find!
>>>
>>>> This fixes the migration-shared-anon-thp testcase failure on Apple M3.
>>>>
>>>> Note that, this is not a "fix" since it only reduces the chance of
>>>> interference of khugepaged with migration, wherein both the kernel
>>>> functionalities are deemed "best-effort".
>>> Thanks for separating this out, appreciated!
>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>> This patch was part of
>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250625055806.82645-1-dev.jain@arm.com/
>>>> but I have sent it separately on suggestion of Lorenzo, and also because
>>>> I plan to send the first two patches after David Hildenbrand's
>>>> folio_pte_batch series gets merged.
>>>>
>>>> mm/khugepaged.c | 12 ++++++++++--
>>>> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/mm/khugepaged.c b/mm/khugepaged.c
>>>> index 1aa7ca67c756..99977bb9bf6a 100644
>>>> --- a/mm/khugepaged.c
>>>> +++ b/mm/khugepaged.c
>>>> @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ enum scan_result {
>>>> SCAN_FAIL,
>>>> SCAN_SUCCEED,
>>>> SCAN_PMD_NULL,
>>>> + SCAN_PMD_MIGRATION,
>>>> SCAN_PMD_NONE,
>>>> SCAN_PMD_MAPPED,
>>>> SCAN_EXCEED_NONE_PTE,
>>>> @@ -941,6 +942,8 @@ static inline int check_pmd_state(pmd_t *pmd)
>>>>
>>>> if (pmd_none(pmde))
>>>> return SCAN_PMD_NONE;
>>>> + if (is_pmd_migration_entry(pmde))
>>>> + return SCAN_PMD_MIGRATION;
>>> With David's suggestions I guess this boils down to simply adding this line.
>> I think it should be
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/khugepaged.c b/mm/khugepaged.c
>> index 1aa7ca67c756..8a6ba5c8ba4d 100644
>> --- a/mm/khugepaged.c
>> +++ b/mm/khugepaged.c
>> @@ -941,10 +941,10 @@ static inline int check_pmd_state(pmd_t *pmd)
>>
>> if (pmd_none(pmde))
>> return SCAN_PMD_NONE;
>> + if (is_pmd_migration_entry(pmde) || pmd_trans_huge(pmde))
>> + return SCAN_PMD_MAPPED;
>> if (!pmd_present(pmde))
>> return SCAN_PMD_NULL;
>> - if (pmd_trans_huge(pmde))
>> - return SCAN_PMD_MAPPED;
>> if (pmd_bad(pmde))
>> return SCAN_PMD_NULL;
>> return SCAN_SUCCEED;
>>
>> Moving this line above since we don't want to exit prematurely
>> due to !pmd_present(pmde).
> Might be cleaner to just add the migration test separately before
> the pmd_present() and without modifying existing pmd_trans_huge().
>
> if (is_pmd_migration_entry(pmde))
> return SCAN_PMD_MAPPED;
Sounds good.
>>
>>> Could we add a quick comment to explain why here?
>> Sure.
>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>>> if (!pmd_present(pmde))
>>>> return SCAN_PMD_NULL;
>>>> if (pmd_trans_huge(pmde))
>>>> @@ -1502,9 +1505,12 @@ int collapse_pte_mapped_thp(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
>>>> !range_in_vma(vma, haddr, haddr + HPAGE_PMD_SIZE))
>>>> return SCAN_VMA_CHECK;
>>>>
>>>> - /* Fast check before locking page if already PMD-mapped */
>>>> + /*
>>>> + * Fast check before locking folio if already PMD-mapped, or if the
>>>> + * folio is under migration
>>>> + */
>>>> result = find_pmd_or_thp_or_none(mm, haddr, &pmd);
>>>> - if (result == SCAN_PMD_MAPPED)
>>>> + if (result == SCAN_PMD_MAPPED || result == SCAN_PMD_MIGRATION)
>>>> return result;
>>>>
>>>> /*
>>>> @@ -2716,6 +2722,7 @@ static int madvise_collapse_errno(enum scan_result r)
>>>> case SCAN_PAGE_LRU:
>>>> case SCAN_DEL_PAGE_LRU:
>>>> case SCAN_PAGE_FILLED:
>>>> + case SCAN_PMD_MIGRATION:
>>>> return -EAGAIN;
>>>> /*
>>>> * Other: Trying again likely not to succeed / error intrinsic to
>>>> @@ -2802,6 +2809,7 @@ int madvise_collapse(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long start,
>>>> goto handle_result;
>>>> /* Whitelisted set of results where continuing OK */
>>>> case SCAN_PMD_NULL:
>>>> + case SCAN_PMD_MIGRATION:
>>>> case SCAN_PTE_NON_PRESENT:
>>>> case SCAN_PTE_UFFD_WP:
>>>> case SCAN_PAGE_RO:
>>>> --
>>>> 2.30.2
>>>>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-07-01 4:40 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-06-30 4:48 [PATCH] khugepaged: Reduce race probability between migration and khugepaged Dev Jain
2025-06-30 7:46 ` Baolin Wang
2025-06-30 7:55 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-06-30 7:58 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-30 8:12 ` Dev Jain
2025-06-30 8:19 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-30 8:39 ` Dev Jain
2025-06-30 13:27 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-30 14:30 ` Dev Jain
2025-07-01 4:30 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-07-01 4:39 ` Dev Jain
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox