From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx151.postini.com [74.125.245.151]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 629A06B0007 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2013 19:13:54 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <50F893D2.7080103@parallels.com> Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 16:14:10 -0800 From: Glauber Costa MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/19] list_lru: per-node list infrastructure References: <1354058086-27937-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <1354058086-27937-10-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <50F6FDC8.5020909@parallels.com> <20130116225521.GF2498@dastard> <50F7475F.90609@parallels.com> <20130117042245.GG2498@dastard> <50F84118.7030608@parallels.com> <20130118001029.GK2498@dastard> In-Reply-To: <20130118001029.GK2498@dastard> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Dave Chinner Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com, Greg Thelen , Ying Han , Suleiman Souhlal On 01/17/2013 04:10 PM, Dave Chinner wrote: > And then each object uses: > > struct lru_item { > struct list_head global_list; > struct list_head memcg_list; > } by objects you mean dentries, inodes, and the such, right? Would it be acceptable to you? We've been of course doing our best to avoid increasing the size of the objects, therefore this is something we've never mentioned. However, if it would be acceptable from the fs POV, this would undoubtedly make our life extremely easier. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org