From: Lin Feng <linfeng@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com,
jbeulich@suse.com, dhowells@redhat.com, wency@cn.fujitsu.com,
isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com, paul.gortmaker@windriver.com,
laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com,
mel@csn.ul.ie, minchan@kernel.org, aquini@redhat.com,
jiang.liu@huawei.com, tony.luck@intel.com, fenghua.yu@intel.com,
benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org,
schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com,
davem@davemloft.net, michael@ellerman.id.au,
gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
x86@kernel.org, linux390@de.ibm.com, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] memory-hotplug: introduce CONFIG_HAVE_BOOTMEM_INFO_NODE and revert register_page_bootmem_info_node() when platform not support
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 18:37:10 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50F7D456.9000904@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130116141436.GE343@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Hi Michal,
On 01/16/2013 10:14 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 16-01-13 16:14:18, Lin Feng wrote:
> [...]
>> diff --git a/mm/Kconfig b/mm/Kconfig
>> index 278e3ab..f8c5799 100644
>> --- a/mm/Kconfig
>> +++ b/mm/Kconfig
>> @@ -162,10 +162,18 @@ config MOVABLE_NODE
>> Say Y here if you want to hotplug a whole node.
>> Say N here if you want kernel to use memory on all nodes evenly.
>>
>> +#
>> +# Only be set on architectures that have completely implemented memory hotplug
>> +# feature. If you are not sure, don't touch it.
>> +#
>> +config HAVE_BOOTMEM_INFO_NODE
>> + def_bool n
>> +
>> # eventually, we can have this option just 'select SPARSEMEM'
>> config MEMORY_HOTPLUG
>> bool "Allow for memory hot-add"
>> select MEMORY_ISOLATION
>> + select HAVE_BOOTMEM_INFO_NODE if X86_64
>> depends on SPARSEMEM || X86_64_ACPI_NUMA
>> depends on HOTPLUG && ARCH_ENABLE_MEMORY_HOTPLUG
>> depends on (IA64 || X86 || PPC_BOOK3S_64 || SUPERH || S390)
>
> I am still not sure I understand the relation to MEMORY_HOTREMOVE.
> Is register_page_bootmem_info_node required/helpful even if
> !CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE?
>From old kenrel's view register_page_bootmem_info_node() is defined in
CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG_SPARSE, it registers some info for
memory hotplug/remove. If we don't use MEMORY_HOTPLUG feature, this
function is empty, we don't need the info at all.
So this info is not required/helpful if !CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE.
>
> Also, now that I am thinking about that more, maybe it would
> be cleaner to put the select into arch/x86/Kconfig and do it
> same as ARCH_ENABLE_MEMORY_{HOTPLUG,HOTREMOVE} (and name it
> ARCH_HAVE_BOOTMEM_INFO_NODE).
>
Maybe put it in mm/Kconfig is a better choice, because if one day someone implements
the register_page_bootmem_info_node() for other archs they will get some clues
here, that's it has been implemented on x86_64.
But I'm not so sure...
thanks,
linfeng
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-17 11:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-16 8:14 [PATCH v3 0/2] " Lin Feng
2013-01-16 8:14 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] " Lin Feng
2013-01-16 14:14 ` Michal Hocko
2013-01-17 10:37 ` Lin Feng [this message]
2013-01-17 13:05 ` Michal Hocko
2013-01-18 7:58 ` Lin Feng
2013-01-16 8:14 ` [PATCH 2/2] memory-hotplug: cleanup: removing the arch specific functions without any implementation Lin Feng
2013-01-16 14:15 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] memory-hotplug: introduce CONFIG_HAVE_BOOTMEM_INFO_NODE and revert register_page_bootmem_info_node() when platform not support Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50F7D456.9000904@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=linfeng@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aquini@redhat.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=jiang.liu@huawei.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux390@de.ibm.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=michael@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=wency@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox