From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@linux.intel.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Simon Jeons <simon.jeons@gmail.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] pageattr fixes for pmd/pte_present
Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2013 13:55:33 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50EB4455.60808@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130107135344.5ca426ca.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On 01/07/2013 01:53 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
>>
>> What's the status of these two patches?
>
> I expect they fell through the christmas cracks. I added them to my
> (getting large) queue of x86 patches for consideration by the x86
> maintainers.
Yes, I'm just coming back online today, and needless to say, I have a
*huge* backlog.
> Why do you ask? It seems the bug is a pretty minor one and that we
> need only fix it in 3.8 or even 3.9. Is that supposition incorrect?
I would like to know this as well.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-07 21:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-17 18:00 Andrea Arcangeli
2012-12-17 18:00 ` [PATCH 1/2] Revert "x86, mm: Make spurious_fault check explicitly check the PRESENT bit" Andrea Arcangeli
2012-12-17 18:17 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-12-17 18:35 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2012-12-17 18:00 ` [PATCH 2/2] pageattr: prevent PSE and GLOABL leftovers to confuse pmd/pte_present and pmd_huge Andrea Arcangeli
2013-01-10 7:59 ` Simon Jeons
2013-01-06 2:59 ` [PATCH 0/2] pageattr fixes for pmd/pte_present Simon Jeons
2013-01-07 21:53 ` Andrew Morton
2013-01-07 21:55 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2013-01-08 12:25 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2013-01-10 7:42 ` Simon Jeons
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50EB4455.60808@linux.intel.com \
--to=hpa@linux.intel.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=shaohua.li@intel.com \
--cc=simon.jeons@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox