From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx134.postini.com [74.125.245.134]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8210E6B005A for ; Thu, 27 Dec 2012 19:26:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from m3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (unknown [10.0.50.73]) by fgwmail5.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF75D3EE0C0 for ; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 09:26:05 +0900 (JST) Received: from smail (m3 [127.0.0.1]) by outgoing.m3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D86D45DEBE for ; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 09:26:05 +0900 (JST) Received: from s3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (s3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp [10.0.50.93]) by m3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7578945DEB7 for ; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 09:26:05 +0900 (JST) Received: from s3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by s3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 665701DB8041 for ; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 09:26:05 +0900 (JST) Received: from m1000.s.css.fujitsu.com (m1000.s.css.fujitsu.com [10.240.81.136]) by s3.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BB811DB803E for ; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 09:26:05 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <50DCE6D5.7000901@jp.fujitsu.com> Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2012 09:24:53 +0900 From: Kamezawa Hiroyuki MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [RFC v4 0/3] Support volatile for anonymous range References: <1355813274-571-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org> <50DA62CE.30604@jp.fujitsu.com> <20121226034600.GB2453@blaptop> In-Reply-To: <20121226034600.GB2453@blaptop> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Minchan Kim Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Michael Kerrisk , Arun Sharma , sanjay@google.com, Paul Turner , David Rientjes , John Stultz , Christoph Lameter , Android Kernel Team , Robert Love , Mel Gorman , Hugh Dickins , Dave Hansen , Rik van Riel , Dave Chinner , Neil Brown , Mike Hommey , Taras Glek , KOSAKI Motohiro (2012/12/26 12:46), Minchan Kim wrote: > Hi Kame, > > What are you doing these holiday season? :) > I can't believe you sit down in front of computer. > Honestly, my holiday starts tomorrow ;) (but until 1/5 in the next year.) >> >> Hm, by the way, the user need to attach pages to the process by causing page-fault >> (as you do by memset()) before calling mvolatile() ? > > For effectiveness, Yes. > Isn't it better to make page-fault by get_user_pages() in mvolatile() ? Calling page fault in userland seems just to increase burden of apps. >> >> I think your approach is interesting, anyway. > > Thanks for your interest, Kame. > > a??a??a? 3/4 a??a?|a??a??a??a??a??. > A happy new year. Thanks, -Kame -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org