From: Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Jaegeuk Hanse <jaegeuk.hanse@gmail.com>
Cc: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, cmetcalf@tilera.com,
sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Jiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com>, Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Jianguo Wu <wujianguo@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 06/12] memory-hotplug: unregister memory section on SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 17:37:49 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50AB4F6D.3050002@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50AB2A1A.6040606@gmail.com>
At 11/20/2012 02:58 PM, Jaegeuk Hanse Wrote:
> On 11/20/2012 02:55 PM, Wen Congyang wrote:
>> At 11/20/2012 02:22 PM, Jaegeuk Hanse Wrote:
>>> On 11/01/2012 05:44 PM, Wen Congyang wrote:
>>>> From: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
>>>>
>>>> Currently __remove_section for SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP does nothing. But
>>>> even if
>>>> we use SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP, we can unregister the memory_section.
>>>>
>>>> So the patch add unregister_memory_section() into __remove_section().
>>> Hi Yasuaki,
>>>
>>> In order to review this patch, I should dig sparse memory codes in
>>> advance. But I have some confuse of codes. Why need encode/decode mem
>>> map instead of set mem_map to ms->section_mem_map directly?
>> The memmap is aligned, and the low bits are zero. We store some
>> information
>> in these bits. So we need to encode/decode memmap here.
>
> Hi Congyang,
>
> Thanks for you reponse. But I mean why return (unsigned long)(mem_map -
> (section_nr_to_pfn(pnum))); in function sparse_encode_mem_map, and then
> return ((struct page *)coded_mem_map) + section_nr_to_pfn(pnum); in
> funtion sparse_decode_mem_map instead of just store mem_map in
> ms->section_mep_map directly.
I don't know why. I try to find the reason, but I don't find any
place to use the pfn stored in the mem_map except in the decode
function. Maybe the designer doesn't want us to access the mem_map
directly.
Thanks
Wen Congyang
>
> Regards,
> Jaegeuk
>
>>
>> Thanks
>> Wen Congyang
>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Jaegeuk
>>>
>>>> CC: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
>>>> CC: Jiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com>
>>>> CC: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
>>>> CC: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
>>>> Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
>>>> CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
>>>> CC: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
>>>> CC: Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> mm/memory_hotplug.c | 13 ++++++++-----
>>>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
>>>> index ca07433..66a79a7 100644
>>>> --- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
>>>> +++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
>>>> @@ -286,11 +286,14 @@ static int __meminit __add_section(int nid,
>>>> struct zone *zone,
>>>> #ifdef CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP
>>>> static int __remove_section(struct zone *zone, struct mem_section
>>>> *ms)
>>>> {
>>>> - /*
>>>> - * XXX: Freeing memmap with vmemmap is not implement yet.
>>>> - * This should be removed later.
>>>> - */
>>>> - return -EBUSY;
>>>> + int ret = -EINVAL;
>>>> +
>>>> + if (!valid_section(ms))
>>>> + return ret;
>>>> +
>>>> + ret = unregister_memory_section(ms);
>>>> +
>>>> + return ret;
>>>> }
>>>> #else
>>>> static int __remove_section(struct zone *zone, struct mem_section
>>>> *ms)
>>>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-20 9:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-01 9:44 [PATCH v3 00/12] memory-hotplug: hot-remove physical memory Wen Congyang
2012-11-01 9:44 ` [PATCH v3 01/12] memory-hotplug: try to offline the memory twice to avoid dependence Wen Congyang
2012-11-01 9:44 ` [PATCH v3 02/12] memory-hotplug: check whether all memory blocks are offlined or not when removing memory Wen Congyang
2012-11-01 9:44 ` [PATCH v3 03/12] memory-hotplug: remove redundant codes Wen Congyang
2012-11-01 9:44 ` [PATCH v3 04/12] memory-hotplug: remove /sys/firmware/memmap/X sysfs Wen Congyang
2012-11-01 9:44 ` [PATCH v3 05/12] memory-hotplug: introduce new function arch_remove_memory() for removing page table depends on architecture Wen Congyang
2012-11-01 9:44 ` [PATCH v3 06/12] memory-hotplug: unregister memory section on SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP Wen Congyang
2012-11-20 6:22 ` Jaegeuk Hanse
2012-11-20 6:55 ` Wen Congyang
2012-11-20 6:58 ` Jaegeuk Hanse
2012-11-20 9:37 ` Wen Congyang [this message]
2012-11-20 11:03 ` Jaegeuk Hanse
2012-11-20 11:16 ` Jaegeuk Hanse
2012-11-21 3:05 ` Wen Congyang
2012-11-21 4:22 ` Jaegeuk Hanse
2012-11-21 4:42 ` Wen Congyang
2012-11-21 5:03 ` Jaegeuk Hanse
2012-11-21 5:12 ` Wen Congyang
2012-11-21 5:28 ` Wen Congyang
2012-11-01 9:44 ` [PATCH v3 07/12] memory-hotplug: implement register_page_bootmem_info_section of sparse-vmemmap Wen Congyang
2012-11-01 9:44 ` [PATCH v3 08/12] memory-hotplug: remove memmap " Wen Congyang
2012-11-27 5:47 ` Jianguo Wu
2012-11-27 6:39 ` Wen Congyang
2012-11-27 6:49 ` Wen Congyang
2012-11-27 7:14 ` Jianguo Wu
2012-11-01 9:44 ` [PATCH v3 09/12] memory-hotplug: remove page table of x86_64 architecture Wen Congyang
2012-11-01 9:44 ` [PATCH v3 10/12] memory-hotplug: memory_hotplug: clear zone when removing the memory Wen Congyang
2012-11-01 9:44 ` [PATCH v3 11/12] memory-hotplug: remove sysfs file of node Wen Congyang
2012-11-19 10:08 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-11-20 9:35 ` Wen Congyang
2012-11-26 14:27 ` Jianguo Wu
2012-11-27 2:24 ` Wen Congyang
2012-11-01 9:44 ` [PATCH v3 12/12] memory-hotplug: free node_data when a node is offlined Wen Congyang
2012-11-16 11:55 ` [PATCH v3 00/12] memory-hotplug: hot-remove physical memory Wen Congyang
2012-11-22 1:33 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50AB4F6D.3050002@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=wency@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=cmetcalf@tilera.com \
--cc=isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=jaegeuk.hanse@gmail.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=liuj97@gmail.com \
--cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wujianguo@huawei.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox