linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] memcg: get rid of once-per-second cache shrinking for dead memcgs
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 18:41:28 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50A4B8C8.6020202@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1352948093-2315-6-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com>

(2012/11/15 11:54), Glauber Costa wrote:
> The idea is to synchronously do it, leaving it up to the shrinking
> facilities in vmscan.c and/or others. Not actively retrying shrinking
> may leave the caches alive for more time, but it will remove the ugly
> wakeups. One would argue that if the caches have free objects but are
> not being shrunk, it is because we don't need that memory yet.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>
> CC: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
> CC: Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
> CC: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
> CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>

I agree this patch but can we have a way to see the number of unaccounted
zombie cache usage for debugging ?

Acked-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>

> ---
>   include/linux/slab.h |  2 +-
>   mm/memcontrol.c      | 17 +++++++----------
>   2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/slab.h b/include/linux/slab.h
> index 18f8c98..456c327 100644
> --- a/include/linux/slab.h
> +++ b/include/linux/slab.h
> @@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ struct memcg_cache_params {
>   			struct kmem_cache *root_cache;
>   			bool dead;
>   			atomic_t nr_pages;
> -			struct delayed_work destroy;
> +			struct work_struct destroy;
>   		};
>   	};
>   };
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index f9c5981..e3d805f 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -3077,9 +3077,8 @@ static void kmem_cache_destroy_work_func(struct work_struct *w)
>   {
>   	struct kmem_cache *cachep;
>   	struct memcg_cache_params *p;
> -	struct delayed_work *dw = to_delayed_work(w);
>   
> -	p = container_of(dw, struct memcg_cache_params, destroy);
> +	p = container_of(w, struct memcg_cache_params, destroy);
>   
>   	cachep = memcg_params_to_cache(p);
>   
> @@ -3103,8 +3102,6 @@ static void kmem_cache_destroy_work_func(struct work_struct *w)
>   		kmem_cache_shrink(cachep);
>   		if (atomic_read(&cachep->memcg_params->nr_pages) == 0)
>   			return;
> -		/* Once per minute should be good enough. */
> -		schedule_delayed_work(&cachep->memcg_params->destroy, 60 * HZ);
>   	} else
>   		kmem_cache_destroy(cachep);
>   }
> @@ -3127,18 +3124,18 @@ void mem_cgroup_destroy_cache(struct kmem_cache *cachep)
>   	 * kmem_cache_shrink is enough to shake all the remaining objects and
>   	 * get the page count to 0. In this case, we'll deadlock if we try to
>   	 * cancel the work (the worker runs with an internal lock held, which
> -	 * is the same lock we would hold for cancel_delayed_work_sync().)
> +	 * is the same lock we would hold for cancel_work_sync().)
>   	 *
>   	 * Since we can't possibly know who got us here, just refrain from
>   	 * running if there is already work pending
>   	 */
> -	if (delayed_work_pending(&cachep->memcg_params->destroy))
> +	if (work_pending(&cachep->memcg_params->destroy))
>   		return;
>   	/*
>   	 * We have to defer the actual destroying to a workqueue, because
>   	 * we might currently be in a context that cannot sleep.
>   	 */
> -	schedule_delayed_work(&cachep->memcg_params->destroy, 0);
> +	schedule_work(&cachep->memcg_params->destroy);
>   }
>   
>   static char *memcg_cache_name(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct kmem_cache *s)
> @@ -3261,7 +3258,7 @@ void kmem_cache_destroy_memcg_children(struct kmem_cache *s)
>   		 * set, so flip it down to guarantee we are in control.
>   		 */
>   		c->memcg_params->dead = false;
> -		cancel_delayed_work_sync(&c->memcg_params->destroy);
> +		cancel_work_sync(&c->memcg_params->destroy);
>   		kmem_cache_destroy(c);
>   	}
>   	mutex_unlock(&set_limit_mutex);
> @@ -3285,9 +3282,9 @@ static void mem_cgroup_destroy_all_caches(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
>   	list_for_each_entry(params, &memcg->memcg_slab_caches, list) {
>   		cachep = memcg_params_to_cache(params);
>   		cachep->memcg_params->dead = true;
> -		INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&cachep->memcg_params->destroy,
> +		INIT_WORK(&cachep->memcg_params->destroy,
>   				  kmem_cache_destroy_work_func);
> -		schedule_delayed_work(&cachep->memcg_params->destroy, 0);
> +		schedule_work(&cachep->memcg_params->destroy);
>   	}
>   	mutex_unlock(&memcg->slab_caches_mutex);
>   }
> 


--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2012-11-15  9:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-11-15  2:54 [PATCH 0/7] fixups for kmemcg Glauber Costa
2012-11-15  0:47 ` David Rientjes
2012-11-15  2:54 ` [PATCH 1/7] memcg: simplify ida initialization Glauber Costa
2012-11-15  2:54 ` [PATCH 2/7] move include of workqueue.h to top of slab.h file Glauber Costa
2012-11-15  9:30   ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-11-15  2:54 ` [PATCH 3/7] memcg: remove test for current->mm in memcg_stop/resume_kmem_account Glauber Costa
2012-11-15  9:28   ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-11-15  2:54 ` [PATCH 4/7] memcg: replace __always_inline with plain inline Glauber Costa
2012-11-15  9:29   ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-11-15  2:54 ` [PATCH 5/7] memcg: get rid of once-per-second cache shrinking for dead memcgs Glauber Costa
2012-11-15  9:41   ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki [this message]
2012-11-15 13:47     ` Glauber Costa
2012-11-16  5:07       ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-11-16  7:11         ` Glauber Costa
2012-11-16  7:21           ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-11-16 14:55             ` Michal Hocko
2012-11-16 15:50               ` Glauber Costa
2012-11-15  2:54 ` [PATCH 6/7] memcg: add comments clarifying aspects of cache attribute propagation Glauber Costa
2012-11-15  2:54 ` [PATCH 7/7] slub: drop mutex before deleting sysfs entry Glauber Costa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50A4B8C8.6020202@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --to=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=glommer@parallels.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
    --cc=penberg@kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox