From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx101.postini.com [74.125.245.101]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A7DEC6B002B for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 20:34:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: from m4.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (unknown [10.0.50.74]) by fgwmail6.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id A239E3EE0BC for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 09:34:15 +0900 (JST) Received: from smail (m4 [127.0.0.1]) by outgoing.m4.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87CFD45DE58 for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 09:34:15 +0900 (JST) Received: from s4.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (s4.gw.fujitsu.co.jp [10.0.50.94]) by m4.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58AAF45DE54 for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 09:34:15 +0900 (JST) Received: from s4.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by s4.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 415DF1DB8040 for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 09:34:15 +0900 (JST) Received: from g01jpexchyt04.g01.fujitsu.local (g01jpexchyt04.g01.fujitsu.local [10.128.194.43]) by s4.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5D3A1DB802F for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 09:34:14 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <50624D5F.9050008@jp.fujitsu.com> Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 09:33:35 +0900 From: Yasuaki Ishimatsu MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: hot-added cpu is not asiggned to the correct node References: <50501E97.2020200@jp.fujitsu.com> <20120924093312.GC28937@mwanda> In-Reply-To: <20120924093312.GC28937@mwanda> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Dan Carpenter Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Dan, At first, thank you for your comment. 2012/09/24 18:33, Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 02:33:11PM +0900, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote: >> When I hot-added CPUs and memories simultaneously using container driver, >> all the hot-added CPUs were mistakenly assigned to node0. >> > > Is this something which used to work correctly? If so which was the > most recent working kernel? The cpu hot-adding is first time on my x86 box. So I don't know whether old kernel can work well or not. But it seems that x86 does not permit to create memory-less-node. So I guess the problem occurs on old kernel. Thanks, Yasuaki Ishimatsu > regards, > dan carpenter > -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org