From: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
To: "Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>
Cc: cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Richard Palethorpe <rpalethorpe@suse.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>,
Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Chris Down <chris@chrisdown.name>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] mm: memcg: Do not count memory.low reclaim if it does not happen
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2022 11:17:14 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5049EBC3-5BAE-4509-BA63-1F4A7D913517@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220324095157.GA16685@blackbody.suse.cz>
> On Mar 24, 2022, at 2:52 AM, Michal Koutný <mkoutny@suse.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 02:44:24PM -0700, Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> wrote:
>> Does it mean that in the following configuration:
>> `parent .low=50M
>> ` s1 .low=0M .current=50M
>> ` s2 .low=0M .current=50M
>> there will be no memory.events::low at all? (assuming the recursive thing is on)
>
> True, no memory.events:low among siblings.
> Number of memory.events:low in the parent depends on how much has to be
> reclaimed (>50M means carving into parent's protection, hence it'll be
> counted).
Ok, so it’s not really about the implementation details of the reclaim mechanism (I mean rounding up to the batch size etc), it’s a more generic change: do not generate low events for cgroups not explicitly protected by a non-zero memory.low value.
Idk, I don’t have a strong argument against this change (except that it changes the existing behavior), but I also don’t see why such events are harmful. Do you mind elaborating a bit more?
Thank you!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-24 18:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-22 18:22 Michal Koutný
2022-03-23 21:44 ` Roman Gushchin
2022-03-24 9:51 ` Michal Koutný
2022-03-24 18:17 ` Roman Gushchin [this message]
2022-03-25 10:31 ` Michal Koutný
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5049EBC3-5BAE-4509-BA63-1F4A7D913517@linux.dev \
--to=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=chris@chrisdown.name \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=rpalethorpe@suse.com \
--cc=shakeelb@google.com \
--cc=shy828301@gmail.com \
--cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox