linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,  linux-mm@kvack.org,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	 lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [LSF/MM/BPF TOPIC] Filesystem inode reclaim
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2026 22:56:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4q7d2bi2qjg6crznvr55yfnv2gcomfqdt5j2dgkrwp5hh3ynqo@cfgy5o53zjwr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <adikj3y6OXgSyObW@infradead.org>

On Fri 10-04-26 00:19:43, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> I think a patch is more useful than a discussion here, that idea has been
> voiced multiple times, and effecticely implemented in XFS.

I know but after thinking for some time I wanted to get some feedback
before I start coding.
 
> Trying to lift the XFS logic into the VFS and finding other consumers
> for it would be very helpful.

I hope not to get all the complexity of XFS but we'll see :)

> > 1) Filesystems will be required to mark inodes that have non-trivial
> > cleanup work to do on reclaim with an inode flag I_RECLAIM_HARD (or
> > whatever :)). Usually I expect this to happen on first inode modification
> > or so. This will require some per-fs work but it shouldn't be that
> > difficult and filesystems can be adapted one-by-one as they decide to
> > address these warnings from reclaim.
> 
> I think otherwise we call this dirty :)

Yup :) I was considering for a while to use another kind of dirty flag for
this and then clean it from flush worker but in the end I decided against
it as it would be IMHO confusing.

> > There's also a simpler approach to this problem but with more radical
> > changes to behavior. For example getting rid of inode LRU completely -
> > inodes without dentries referencing them anymore should be rare and it
> > isn't very useful to cache them. So we can always drop inodes on last
> > iput() (as we currently do for example for unlinked inodes). But I have a
> > nagging feeling that somebody is depending on inode LRU somewhere - I'd
> > like poll the collective knowledge of what could possibly go wrong here :)
> 
> I've heard this theory multiple times, but we really need to valide that
> we don't need the LRU.  It also doesn't really solve the above problem,
> as we still would not want to perform the expensive inode inactivation
> work inline with the last dput.
> 
> So while this might be worth investigating, please keept it separate.

Ack. With the point Jeff made about NFS revalidations I agree it won't be
straightforward.

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR


  reply	other threads:[~2026-04-10 20:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-09  9:16 Jan Kara
2026-04-09 12:57 ` [Lsf-pc] " Amir Goldstein
2026-04-09 16:48   ` Boris Burkov
2026-04-10 10:00     ` Jan Kara
2026-04-10 11:08     ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-04-10 13:58       ` Jan Kara
2026-04-10  9:54   ` Jan Kara
2026-04-09 16:12 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-04-09 17:37   ` Jeff Layton
2026-04-10  9:43     ` Jan Kara
2026-04-10  7:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-04-10 20:56   ` Jan Kara [this message]
2026-04-10 21:14     ` Andreas Dilger
2026-04-10  9:23 ` Christian Brauner
2026-04-10 10:14   ` Jan Kara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4q7d2bi2qjg6crznvr55yfnv2gcomfqdt5j2dgkrwp5hh3ynqo@cfgy5o53zjwr \
    --to=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox