On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 08:33:09AM -0700, Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev> wrote:
> However I want us to discuss and decide the semantics of
> memsw from scratch rather than adopting v1 semantics.

+1

> Also we should discuss how memsw and swap limits would interact and
> what would be the appropriate default.

Besides more complicated implementation, merged memsw won't represent an
actual resource.

So I'd be interested in use cases (other than "used to it from v1") that
cannot be controlled with separate memory. and swap. limits.


0.02€,
Michal