linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: will@kernel.org, aneesh.kumar@kernel.org, npiggin@gmail.com,
	peterz@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com,
	bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, x86@kernel.org,
	hpa@zytor.com, arnd@arndb.de, david@kernel.org,
	lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com, ziy@nvidia.com,
	baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com, Liam.Howlett@oracle.com,
	npache@redhat.com, ryan.roberts@arm.com, dev.jain@arm.com,
	baohua@kernel.org, ioworker0@gmail.com, shy828301@gmail.com,
	riel@surriel.com, jannh@google.com, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/3] mm/tlb: allow architectures to skip redundant TLB sync IPIs
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2025 13:48:14 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4ff8abad-186a-41b7-a269-70e9b1dc61e5@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251213080038.10917-2-lance.yang@linux.dev>



On 2025/12/13 16:00, Lance Yang wrote:
> From: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
> 
> When unsharing hugetlb PMD page tables, we currently send two IPIs:
> one for TLB invalidation, and another to synchronize with concurrent
> GUP-fast walkers.
> 
> However, if the TLB flush already reaches all CPUs, the second IPI is
> redundant. GUP-fast runs with IRQs disabled, so when the TLB flush IPI
> completes, any concurrent GUP-fast must have finished.
> 
> Add tlb_table_flush_implies_ipi_broadcast() to let architectures indicate
> their TLB flush provides full synchronization, enabling the redundant IPI
> to be skipped.
> 
> The default implementation returns false to maintain current behavior.
> 
> Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand (Red Hat) <david@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
> ---
>   include/asm-generic/tlb.h | 22 +++++++++++++++++++++-
>   1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/tlb.h b/include/asm-generic/tlb.h
> index 324a21f53b64..3f0add95604f 100644
> --- a/include/asm-generic/tlb.h
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/tlb.h
> @@ -248,6 +248,21 @@ static inline void tlb_remove_table(struct mmu_gather *tlb, void *table)
>   #define tlb_needs_table_invalidate() (true)
>   #endif
>   
> +/*
> + * Architectures can override if their TLB flush already broadcasts IPIs to all
> + * CPUs when freeing or unsharing page tables.
> + *
> + * Return true only when the flush guarantees:
> + * - IPIs reach all CPUs with potentially stale paging-structure cache entries
> + * - Synchronization with IRQ-disabled code like GUP-fast
> + */
> +#ifndef tlb_table_flush_implies_ipi_broadcast
> +static inline bool tlb_table_flush_implies_ipi_broadcast(void)
> +{
> +	return false;
> +}
> +#endif

As the kernel test robot reported[1][2], the compiler is unhappy with
patch #3:

```
    mm/khugepaged.c: In function 'collapse_huge_page':
>> >> mm/khugepaged.c:1185:14: error: implicit declaration of function 'tlb_table_flush_implies_ipi_broadcast' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
     1185 |         if (!tlb_table_flush_implies_ipi_broadcast())
          |              ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
```

I'll move tlb_table_flush_implies_ipi_broadcast() outside of
CONFIG_MMU_GATHER_RCU_TABLE_FREE in next version, making the complier
happy on architectures that don't enable that config ;)

[1] 
https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202512142105.NXwq6dfP-lkp@intel.com/

[2] 
https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202512142156.cShiu6PU-lkp@intel.com/
> +
>   void tlb_remove_table_sync_one(void);
>   
>   #else
> @@ -829,12 +844,17 @@ static inline void tlb_flush_unshared_tables(struct mmu_gather *tlb)
>   	 * We only perform this when we are the last sharer of a page table,
>   	 * as the IPI will reach all CPUs: any GUP-fast.
>   	 *
> +	 * However, if the TLB flush already synchronized with other CPUs
> +	 * (indicated by tlb_table_flush_implies_ipi_broadcast()), we can skip
> +	 * the additional IPI.
> +	 *
>   	 * Note that on configs where tlb_remove_table_sync_one() is a NOP,
>   	 * the expectation is that the tlb_flush_mmu_tlbonly() would have issued
>   	 * required IPIs already for us.
>   	 */
>   	if (tlb->fully_unshared_tables) {
> -		tlb_remove_table_sync_one();
> +		if (!tlb_table_flush_implies_ipi_broadcast())
> +			tlb_remove_table_sync_one();
>   		tlb->fully_unshared_tables = false;
>   	}
>   }



  reply	other threads:[~2025-12-15  5:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-12-13  8:00 [PATCH RFC 0/3] " Lance Yang
2025-12-13  8:00 ` [PATCH RFC 1/3] mm/tlb: allow architectures to " Lance Yang
2025-12-15  5:48   ` Lance Yang [this message]
2025-12-18 13:08     ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-12-13  8:00 ` [PATCH RFC 2/3] x86/mm: implement redundant IPI elimination for PMD unsharing Lance Yang
2025-12-18 13:08   ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-12-22  3:19     ` [PATCH RFC 2/3] x86/mm: implement redundant IPI elimination for Lance Yang
2025-12-23  9:44       ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-12-23 11:13         ` Lance Yang
2025-12-13  8:00 ` [PATCH RFC 3/3] mm/khugepaged: skip redundant IPI in collapse_huge_page() Lance Yang
2025-12-18 13:13   ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-12-18 14:35     ` Lance Yang
2025-12-19  8:25       ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-12-21 10:43         ` Lance Yang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4ff8abad-186a-41b7-a269-70e9b1dc61e5@linux.dev \
    --to=lance.yang@linux.dev \
    --cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=baohua@kernel.org \
    --cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=ioworker0@gmail.com \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=npache@redhat.com \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=riel@surriel.com \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=shy828301@gmail.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox