From: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: will@kernel.org, aneesh.kumar@kernel.org, npiggin@gmail.com,
peterz@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com,
bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, x86@kernel.org,
hpa@zytor.com, arnd@arndb.de, david@kernel.org,
lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com, ziy@nvidia.com,
baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com, Liam.Howlett@oracle.com,
npache@redhat.com, ryan.roberts@arm.com, dev.jain@arm.com,
baohua@kernel.org, ioworker0@gmail.com, shy828301@gmail.com,
riel@surriel.com, jannh@google.com, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/3] mm/tlb: allow architectures to skip redundant TLB sync IPIs
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2025 13:48:14 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4ff8abad-186a-41b7-a269-70e9b1dc61e5@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251213080038.10917-2-lance.yang@linux.dev>
On 2025/12/13 16:00, Lance Yang wrote:
> From: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
>
> When unsharing hugetlb PMD page tables, we currently send two IPIs:
> one for TLB invalidation, and another to synchronize with concurrent
> GUP-fast walkers.
>
> However, if the TLB flush already reaches all CPUs, the second IPI is
> redundant. GUP-fast runs with IRQs disabled, so when the TLB flush IPI
> completes, any concurrent GUP-fast must have finished.
>
> Add tlb_table_flush_implies_ipi_broadcast() to let architectures indicate
> their TLB flush provides full synchronization, enabling the redundant IPI
> to be skipped.
>
> The default implementation returns false to maintain current behavior.
>
> Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand (Red Hat) <david@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
> ---
> include/asm-generic/tlb.h | 22 +++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/tlb.h b/include/asm-generic/tlb.h
> index 324a21f53b64..3f0add95604f 100644
> --- a/include/asm-generic/tlb.h
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/tlb.h
> @@ -248,6 +248,21 @@ static inline void tlb_remove_table(struct mmu_gather *tlb, void *table)
> #define tlb_needs_table_invalidate() (true)
> #endif
>
> +/*
> + * Architectures can override if their TLB flush already broadcasts IPIs to all
> + * CPUs when freeing or unsharing page tables.
> + *
> + * Return true only when the flush guarantees:
> + * - IPIs reach all CPUs with potentially stale paging-structure cache entries
> + * - Synchronization with IRQ-disabled code like GUP-fast
> + */
> +#ifndef tlb_table_flush_implies_ipi_broadcast
> +static inline bool tlb_table_flush_implies_ipi_broadcast(void)
> +{
> + return false;
> +}
> +#endif
As the kernel test robot reported[1][2], the compiler is unhappy with
patch #3:
```
mm/khugepaged.c: In function 'collapse_huge_page':
>> >> mm/khugepaged.c:1185:14: error: implicit declaration of function 'tlb_table_flush_implies_ipi_broadcast' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
1185 | if (!tlb_table_flush_implies_ipi_broadcast())
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
```
I'll move tlb_table_flush_implies_ipi_broadcast() outside of
CONFIG_MMU_GATHER_RCU_TABLE_FREE in next version, making the complier
happy on architectures that don't enable that config ;)
[1]
https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202512142105.NXwq6dfP-lkp@intel.com/
[2]
https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202512142156.cShiu6PU-lkp@intel.com/
> +
> void tlb_remove_table_sync_one(void);
>
> #else
> @@ -829,12 +844,17 @@ static inline void tlb_flush_unshared_tables(struct mmu_gather *tlb)
> * We only perform this when we are the last sharer of a page table,
> * as the IPI will reach all CPUs: any GUP-fast.
> *
> + * However, if the TLB flush already synchronized with other CPUs
> + * (indicated by tlb_table_flush_implies_ipi_broadcast()), we can skip
> + * the additional IPI.
> + *
> * Note that on configs where tlb_remove_table_sync_one() is a NOP,
> * the expectation is that the tlb_flush_mmu_tlbonly() would have issued
> * required IPIs already for us.
> */
> if (tlb->fully_unshared_tables) {
> - tlb_remove_table_sync_one();
> + if (!tlb_table_flush_implies_ipi_broadcast())
> + tlb_remove_table_sync_one();
> tlb->fully_unshared_tables = false;
> }
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-15 5:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-13 8:00 [PATCH RFC 0/3] " Lance Yang
2025-12-13 8:00 ` [PATCH RFC 1/3] mm/tlb: allow architectures to " Lance Yang
2025-12-15 5:48 ` Lance Yang [this message]
2025-12-18 13:08 ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-12-13 8:00 ` [PATCH RFC 2/3] x86/mm: implement redundant IPI elimination for PMD unsharing Lance Yang
2025-12-18 13:08 ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-12-22 3:19 ` [PATCH RFC 2/3] x86/mm: implement redundant IPI elimination for Lance Yang
2025-12-23 9:44 ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-12-23 11:13 ` Lance Yang
2025-12-13 8:00 ` [PATCH RFC 3/3] mm/khugepaged: skip redundant IPI in collapse_huge_page() Lance Yang
2025-12-18 13:13 ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-12-18 14:35 ` Lance Yang
2025-12-19 8:25 ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-12-21 10:43 ` Lance Yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4ff8abad-186a-41b7-a269-70e9b1dc61e5@linux.dev \
--to=lance.yang@linux.dev \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=ioworker0@gmail.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=npache@redhat.com \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=shy828301@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox