linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: paulmck@kernel.org
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
	Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
	Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
	Zqiang <qiang.zhang1211@gmail.com>,
	rcu@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] slab, rcu: move and consolidate TINY_RCU kvfree_rcu() to SLAB
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2025 11:02:47 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4fdbb91c-df21-4dab-a165-a4e864625628@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5ee3321c-417a-4638-8d9e-77faa5f07462@paulmck-laptop>

On 2/3/25 20:07, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 03, 2025 at 10:28:46AM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>> Following the move of the TREE_RCU batching kvfree_rcu() implementation
>> to slab, we still have the simple non-batching implementation in tiny
>> RCU, and RCU implementation specific ifdefs in slab code.
>> 
>> Finish the move and integration into slab. Allow using the simple
>> call_rcu() based implementation also with tree RCU when SLUB_TINY is
>> enabled, as its goal is also to limit memory footprint with less concern
>> for top performance.
>> 
>> In order to avoid RCU having to recognize the fake callback function
>> pointers (__is_kvfree_rcu_offset()) when handling call_rcu(), implement
>> a callback that can calculate the object's address from the embedded
>> rcu_head pointer without knowing the specific offset (previously SLOB
>> would not have made it possible, but it's gone now).
>> 
>> After this series, AFAIK only the following kvfree_rcu specific code
>> remains in RCU:
>> 
>> - a call to kfree_rcu_scheduler_running() from rcu_set_runtime_mode()
>> 
>>   - probably necessary and a generic registration interface would be
>>     unnecessary bloat?
> 
> I am OK with this calling directly.
> 
> Alternatively, you could create a core_initcall() that did nothing
> but invoke kfree_rcu_scheduler_running(), and then drop that call from
> rcu_set_runtime_mode().  Up to you guys!

I was afraid there's some ordering necessary with the rest of what
rcu_set_runtime_mode() does, but perhaps there's actually not.

>> - declarations of kfree_rcu() API in include/linux/rcupdate.h
>> 
>>   - could be moved to slab.h after checking for/fixing up potential
>>     missing includes
> 
> It would be good to move them, but no real hurry from this end.
> 
>> git tree:
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vbabka/linux.git/log/?h=b4/slub-tiny-kfree_rcu
>> 
>> Changes since RFC [1]:
>> - Rebased to v6.14-rc1
>> - Fixed build errors reported by bots.
>> - Changed where kvfree_call_rcu() is moved to in patch 1 to avoid another
>>   move in patch 4.
>> - R-b's by Ulad and Joel
>> - Fix a memory leak in kvfree_rcu_list() thanks to Ulad
>> - Various comments' improvements and fixes (Joel, Ulad)
>> - Rename config to CONFIG_KFREE_RCU_BATCHED (Ulad)
>> 
>> Due to changes, didn't keep Paul's Tested-by (but thanks!)
> 
> I re-ran the tests, so feel free to add it back in.  ;-)

Thanks, will do :)




  reply	other threads:[~2025-02-04 10:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-03  9:28 Vlastimil Babka
2025-02-03  9:28 ` [PATCH 1/4] slab, rcu: move TINY_RCU variant of " Vlastimil Babka
2025-02-04  9:50   ` Harry (Hyeonggon) Yoo
2025-02-03  9:28 ` [PATCH 2/4] rcu: remove trace_rcu_kvfree_callback Vlastimil Babka
2025-02-05  9:28   ` Harry (Hyeonggon) Yoo
2025-02-03  9:28 ` [PATCH 3/4] rcu, slab: use a regular callback function for kvfree_rcu Vlastimil Babka
2025-02-05  9:13   ` Harry (Hyeonggon) Yoo
2025-02-03  9:28 ` [PATCH 4/4] slab: don't batch kvfree_rcu() with SLUB_TINY Vlastimil Babka
2025-02-05  9:40   ` Harry (Hyeonggon) Yoo
2025-02-03 19:07 ` [PATCH 0/4] slab, rcu: move and consolidate TINY_RCU kvfree_rcu() to SLAB Paul E. McKenney
2025-02-04 10:02   ` Vlastimil Babka [this message]
2025-02-04 11:41     ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-02-05  9:54 ` Vlastimil Babka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4fdbb91c-df21-4dab-a165-a4e864625628@suse.cz \
    --to=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=42.hyeyoo@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=qiang.zhang1211@gmail.com \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=urezki@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox