From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A74BC00140 for ; Fri, 5 Aug 2022 18:21:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id E64A98E0001; Fri, 5 Aug 2022 14:21:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id DED296B0072; Fri, 5 Aug 2022 14:21:08 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id C669A8E0001; Fri, 5 Aug 2022 14:21:08 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0011.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.11]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B07376B0071 for ; Fri, 5 Aug 2022 14:21:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin19.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76C6D1219C3 for ; Fri, 5 Aug 2022 18:21:08 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 79766355816.19.2CA5105 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by imf29.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F5B5120031 for ; Fri, 5 Aug 2022 18:21:06 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1659723666; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=1mlYKrCPjqQWFwXGPhouLeMfdvjXX0OuvjhFYgKbtVo=; b=f/zQKBEVaPYhfAyT7oiP9OtJBpkqzVDofrWNFRruL155ZVa3/iBfRDaBHPK4VcyRgqq5Tg fqqvOJsDgEsw4N6w44ayajsIIRE0Ez3B5aLJpyYo0AFgdZAo3H1txezYwOvDE/1ohexgzU XpaEyStLQvHZxoo17y9Yf9yHMr7Dgy4= Received: from mail-wm1-f70.google.com (mail-wm1-f70.google.com [209.85.128.70]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-660-_xWpGgRtNaOFU7lZ_9ylVA-1; Fri, 05 Aug 2022 14:21:05 -0400 X-MC-Unique: _xWpGgRtNaOFU7lZ_9ylVA-1 Received: by mail-wm1-f70.google.com with SMTP id n30-20020a05600c501e00b003a3264465ebso3583487wmr.1 for ; Fri, 05 Aug 2022 11:21:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:subject:organization:from :references:cc:to:content-language:user-agent:mime-version:date :message-id:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc; bh=1mlYKrCPjqQWFwXGPhouLeMfdvjXX0OuvjhFYgKbtVo=; b=T8Yg1v9cA8FhLtTbRqqRV0kLsfzrFBVIm36BaYfRAR/NDN29afXqSByY/EjpwX/MOC xlIQQ7uyN+sS35uyE5x5d7oOIAb0RFGfJe7mOArMOIhoc0PDSLfxZOnyeV+5bQIkOQXK zZFrWk2tdbLhGxaw8GZkvqSxQf1Rkhcq8egPQmAlF+oBHbl7R4DH1VV20cMkD65BxyON gPTyBKChhVu2VYBZT+p7Sc4LPZlQfvYD3ljXGN19HnTJN/Lctvlfw6YraHFTSe02FHXY OytM8Js0ah1YRHP9bzU7X89aKaIX4is+XcQmHSes6fN3NTrMMZsqExsmJ7Pauao/2QrI rxOQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo1yjr+NPxc1dhE1PimZOgFvTsXHbyggzIuhAq2N4AIcPe7cl7GF xoOKc4Ei1qUDIQL+fPMTlgX69TSHBKPuAQzj4xzRsCsqxbn8yXqCvRdLA2+KwPbUIhft6Tt4cGl NoMOrJRD2l9I= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:1d83:b0:21e:9ed9:9f65 with SMTP id bk3-20020a0560001d8300b0021e9ed99f65mr4999204wrb.680.1659723664149; Fri, 05 Aug 2022 11:21:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR7i4CdqcHfa6DOEyLxtbYSrdKepdnypk2RFZhmbQICBeV1CG3WNiQ8MQE2A6EUZkKDKZa/Xyg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:1d83:b0:21e:9ed9:9f65 with SMTP id bk3-20020a0560001d8300b0021e9ed99f65mr4999188wrb.680.1659723663892; Fri, 05 Aug 2022 11:21:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPV6:2003:cb:c706:fb00:f5c3:24b2:3d03:9d52? (p200300cbc706fb00f5c324b23d039d52.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [2003:cb:c706:fb00:f5c3:24b2:3d03:9d52]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t124-20020a1c4682000000b00397402ae674sm10043665wma.11.2022.08.05.11.20.55 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 05 Aug 2022 11:21:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4f644ac5-c40b-32d4-3234-c1dac3d09f83@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2022 20:20:52 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.11.0 To: Peter Xu Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton , Mike Kravetz , Muchun Song , Peter Feiner , "Kirill A . Shutemov" References: <20220805110329.80540-1-david@redhat.com> <20220805110329.80540-3-david@redhat.com> From: David Hildenbrand Organization: Red Hat Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] mm/hugetlb: support write-faults in shared mappings In-Reply-To: X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf29.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b="f/zQKBEV"; spf=pass (imf29.hostedemail.com: domain of david@redhat.com designates 170.10.133.124 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=david@redhat.com; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=redhat.com ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1659723668; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=pdRWs4d3caAsRrOyHfK8/Vo7YqpnkdGVu2BiQpgfKTRJq7JAFLNtPIwGTijbgGrQ7zKFf3 kGtyhXOhzUMkaFL11xiuuAGmGFkEOnDYIoX2k0UziLp9iDfRwgKWq309syIIYhfYvoirpI YokJdneFxHVtjUfylGCerbVRlcJ9dI8= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1659723668; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=1mlYKrCPjqQWFwXGPhouLeMfdvjXX0OuvjhFYgKbtVo=; b=db7kS3irI05xH5lOWDYEbTWCT+0TjtjTpp77IMUlVDsPBF1EXzwlH17nISs7YsJOIOtMmy xRiMf9/Aqr6dYtu71UEgDmNG+5d2ruVwn8j7/lLqG02NcZTyV5ylrua/0FJTrJpa8J4FbO C5dRvo2FdCr6PTrZzL83hFlg19ci6MY= X-Rspamd-Server: rspam09 X-Rspam-User: Authentication-Results: imf29.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b="f/zQKBEV"; spf=pass (imf29.hostedemail.com: domain of david@redhat.com designates 170.10.133.124 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=david@redhat.com; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=redhat.com X-Stat-Signature: 4sqg3wmroz7kgdi1ztfmufmjsst71rfq X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 5F5B5120031 X-HE-Tag: 1659723666-785378 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On 05.08.22 20:12, Peter Xu wrote: > On Fri, Aug 05, 2022 at 01:03:29PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote: >> Let's add a safety net if we ever get (again) a write-fault on a R/O-mapped >> page in a shared mapping, in which case we simply have to map the >> page writable. >> >> VM_MAYSHARE handling in hugetlb_fault() for FAULT_FLAG_WRITE >> indicates that this was at least envisioned, but could never have worked >> as expected. This theoretically paves the way for softdirty tracking >> support in hugetlb. >> >> Tested without the fix for softdirty tracking. >> >> Note that there is no need to do any kind of reservation in hugetlb_fault() >> in this case ... because we already have a hugetlb page mapped R/O >> that we will simply map writable and we are not dealing with COW/unsharing. >> >> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand >> --- >> mm/hugetlb.c | 21 ++++++++++++++------- >> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c >> index a18c071c294e..bbab7aa9d8f8 100644 >> --- a/mm/hugetlb.c >> +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c >> @@ -5233,6 +5233,16 @@ static vm_fault_t hugetlb_wp(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma, >> VM_BUG_ON(unshare && (flags & FOLL_WRITE)); >> VM_BUG_ON(!unshare && !(flags & FOLL_WRITE)); >> >> + /* Let's take out shared mappings first, this should be a rare event. */ >> + if (unlikely(vma->vm_flags & VM_MAYSHARE)) { > > Should we check VM_SHARED instead? Relying on VM_SHARED to detect MAP_PRIVATE vs. MAP_SHARED is unfortunately wrong. If you're curious, take a look at f83a275dbc5c ("mm: account for MAP_SHARED mappings using VM_MAYSHARE and not VM_SHARED in hugetlbfs") and mmap() code. Long story short: if the file is read-only, we only have VM_MAYSHARE but not VM_SHARED (and consequently also not VM_MAYWRITE). > >> + if (unshare) >> + return 0; > > Curious when will this happen especially if we switch to VM_SHARED above. > Shouldn't "unshare" not happen at all on a shared region? FAULT_FLAG_UNSHARE is documented to behave like: "FAULT_FLAG_UNSHARE is ignored and treated like an ordinary read fault when no existing R/O-mapped anonymous page is encountered." It should currently not happen. Focus on should ;) > >> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!(vma->vm_flags & VM_WRITE))) >> + return VM_FAULT_SIGSEGV; > > I had a feeling that you just want to double check we have write > permission, but IIUC this should be checked far earlier or we'll have > problem. No strong opinion if so, but I'd suggest dropping this one, > otherwise we could add tons of WARN_ON_ONCE() in anywhere in the page fault > stack and they mostly won't trigger at all. Not quite. We usually (!hugetlb) have maybe_mkwrite() all over the place. This is just an indication that we don't have maybe semantics here. But as we also don't have it for hugetlb anon code below, maybe I can just drop it. (or check it for both call paths) > >> + set_huge_ptep_writable(vma, haddr, ptep); > > Do we wanna set dirty bits too? set_huge_ptep_writable() handles that. Thanks! -- Thanks, David / dhildenb