From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] mm: Close theoretical race where stale TLB entries could linger
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2025 14:43:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4f4fab59-abc2-4700-8477-edcb68d633df@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250606092809.4194056-1-ryan.roberts@arm.com>
On 06.06.25 11:28, Ryan Roberts wrote:
> Commit 3ea277194daa ("mm, mprotect: flush TLB if potentially racing with
> a parallel reclaim leaving stale TLB entries") described a theoretical
> race as such:
>
> """
> Nadav Amit identified a theoritical race between page reclaim and
> mprotect due to TLB flushes being batched outside of the PTL being held.
>
> He described the race as follows:
>
> CPU0 CPU1
> ---- ----
> user accesses memory using RW PTE
> [PTE now cached in TLB]
> try_to_unmap_one()
> ==> ptep_get_and_clear()
> ==> set_tlb_ubc_flush_pending()
> mprotect(addr, PROT_READ)
> ==> change_pte_range()
> ==> [ PTE non-present - no flush ]
>
> user writes using cached RW PTE
> ...
>
> try_to_unmap_flush()
>
> The same type of race exists for reads when protecting for PROT_NONE and
> also exists for operations that can leave an old TLB entry behind such
> as munmap, mremap and madvise.
> """
>
> The solution was to introduce flush_tlb_batched_pending() and call it
> under the PTL from mprotect/madvise/munmap/mremap to complete any
> pending tlb flushes.
>
> However, while madvise_free_pte_range() and
> madvise_cold_or_pageout_pte_range() were both retro-fitted to call
> flush_tlb_batched_pending() immediately after initially acquiring the
> PTL, they both temporarily release the PTL to split a large folio if
> they stumble upon one. In this case, where re-acquiring the PTL
> flush_tlb_batched_pending() must be called again, but it previously was
> not. Let's fix that.
>
> There are 2 Fixes: tags here: the first is the commit that fixed
> madvise_free_pte_range(). The second is the commit that added
> madvise_cold_or_pageout_pte_range(), which looks like it copy/pasted the
> faulty pattern from madvise_free_pte_range().
>
> This is a theoretical bug discovered during code review.
>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Fixes: 3ea277194daa ("mm, mprotect: flush TLB if potentially racing with a parallel reclaim leaving stale TLB entries")
> Fixes: 9c276cc65a58 ("mm: introduce MADV_COLD")
> Signed-off-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
> ---
>
> Applies on today's mm-unstable (3f676fe5c7a0). All mm selftests continue to
> pass.
>
> Thanks,
> Ryan
LGTM
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-06 12:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-06 9:28 Ryan Roberts
2025-06-06 12:37 ` Jann Horn
2025-06-06 12:43 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4f4fab59-abc2-4700-8477-edcb68d633df@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox