From: sagig@mellanox.com
To: aarcange@redhat.com
Cc: ogerlitz@mellanox.com, oren@mellanox.com, gleb@redhat.com,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: [PATCH RFC V2] mm: convert rcu_read_lock() to srcu_read_lock(), thus allowing to sleep in callbacks
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2012 16:40:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4f2fe67e.e54cb40a.5700.ffff8fdf@mx.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <y>
From: Sagi Grimberg <sagig@mellanox.co.il>
Now that anon_vma lock and i_mmap_mutex are both sleepable mutex, it is possible to schedule inside invalidation callbacks
(such as invalidate_page, invalidate_range_start/end and change_pte) .
This is essential for a scheduling HW sync in RDMA drivers which apply on demand paging methods.
Signed-off-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagig@mellanox.co.il>
---
changes from V1:
1. converted synchronize_rcu() to synchronize_srcu() to racing candidates (unregister, release)
2. do_mmu_notifier_register: moved init_srcu_struct out of mmap_sem locking.
3. do_mmu_notifier_register: fixed error path.
include/linux/mmu_notifier.h | 3 +++
mm/mmu_notifier.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/mmu_notifier.h b/include/linux/mmu_notifier.h
index 1d1b1e1..f3d6f30 100644
--- a/include/linux/mmu_notifier.h
+++ b/include/linux/mmu_notifier.h
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
#include <linux/list.h>
#include <linux/spinlock.h>
#include <linux/mm_types.h>
+#include <linux/srcu.h>
struct mmu_notifier;
struct mmu_notifier_ops;
@@ -21,6 +22,8 @@ struct mmu_notifier_mm {
struct hlist_head list;
/* to serialize the list modifications and hlist_unhashed */
spinlock_t lock;
+ /* to enable sleeping in callbacks */
+ struct srcu_struct srcu;
};
struct mmu_notifier_ops {
diff --git a/mm/mmu_notifier.c b/mm/mmu_notifier.c
index 9a611d3..7267fb2 100644
--- a/mm/mmu_notifier.c
+++ b/mm/mmu_notifier.c
@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ void __mmu_notifier_release(struct mm_struct *mm)
spin_unlock(&mm->mmu_notifier_mm->lock);
/*
- * synchronize_rcu here prevents mmu_notifier_release to
+ * synchronize_srcu here prevents mmu_notifier_release to
* return to exit_mmap (which would proceed freeing all pages
* in the mm) until the ->release method returns, if it was
* invoked by mmu_notifier_unregister.
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ void __mmu_notifier_release(struct mm_struct *mm)
* The mmu_notifier_mm can't go away from under us because one
* mm_count is hold by exit_mmap.
*/
- synchronize_rcu();
+ synchronize_srcu(&mm->mmu_notifier_mm->srcu);
}
/*
@@ -123,10 +123,11 @@ int __mmu_notifier_test_young(struct mm_struct *mm,
void __mmu_notifier_change_pte(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address,
pte_t pte)
{
+ int idx;
struct mmu_notifier *mn;
struct hlist_node *n;
- rcu_read_lock();
+ idx = srcu_read_lock(&mm->mmu_notifier_mm->srcu);
hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(mn, n, &mm->mmu_notifier_mm->list, hlist) {
if (mn->ops->change_pte)
mn->ops->change_pte(mn, mm, address, pte);
@@ -137,49 +138,52 @@ void __mmu_notifier_change_pte(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address,
else if (mn->ops->invalidate_page)
mn->ops->invalidate_page(mn, mm, address);
}
- rcu_read_unlock();
+ srcu_read_unlock(&mm->mmu_notifier_mm->srcu, idx);
}
void __mmu_notifier_invalidate_page(struct mm_struct *mm,
unsigned long address)
{
+ int idx;
struct mmu_notifier *mn;
struct hlist_node *n;
- rcu_read_lock();
+ idx = srcu_read_lock(&mm->mmu_notifier_mm->srcu);
hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(mn, n, &mm->mmu_notifier_mm->list, hlist) {
if (mn->ops->invalidate_page)
mn->ops->invalidate_page(mn, mm, address);
}
- rcu_read_unlock();
+ srcu_read_unlock(&mm->mmu_notifier_mm->srcu, idx);
}
void __mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(struct mm_struct *mm,
unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
{
+ int idx;
struct mmu_notifier *mn;
struct hlist_node *n;
- rcu_read_lock();
+ idx = srcu_read_lock(&mm->mmu_notifier_mm->srcu);
hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(mn, n, &mm->mmu_notifier_mm->list, hlist) {
if (mn->ops->invalidate_range_start)
mn->ops->invalidate_range_start(mn, mm, start, end);
}
- rcu_read_unlock();
+ srcu_read_unlock(&mm->mmu_notifier_mm->srcu, idx);
}
void __mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end(struct mm_struct *mm,
unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
{
+ int idx;
struct mmu_notifier *mn;
struct hlist_node *n;
- rcu_read_lock();
+ idx = srcu_read_lock(&mm->mmu_notifier_mm->srcu);
hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(mn, n, &mm->mmu_notifier_mm->list, hlist) {
if (mn->ops->invalidate_range_end)
mn->ops->invalidate_range_end(mn, mm, start, end);
}
- rcu_read_unlock();
+ srcu_read_unlock(&mm->mmu_notifier_mm->srcu, idx);
}
static int do_mmu_notifier_register(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
@@ -196,6 +200,9 @@ static int do_mmu_notifier_register(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
if (unlikely(!mmu_notifier_mm))
goto out;
+ if (init_srcu_struct(&mmu_notifier_mm->srcu))
+ goto out_cleanup;
+
if (take_mmap_sem)
down_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
ret = mm_take_all_locks(mm);
@@ -226,8 +233,12 @@ static int do_mmu_notifier_register(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
out_cleanup:
if (take_mmap_sem)
up_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
- /* kfree() does nothing if mmu_notifier_mm is NULL */
- kfree(mmu_notifier_mm);
+
+ if (mm->mmu_notifier_mm) {
+ /* in the case srcu_init failed srcu_cleanup is safe */
+ cleanup_srcu_struct(&mm->mmu_notifier_mm->srcu);
+ kfree(mmu_notifier_mm);
+ }
out:
BUG_ON(atomic_read(&mm->mm_users) <= 0);
return ret;
@@ -266,6 +277,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__mmu_notifier_register);
void __mmu_notifier_mm_destroy(struct mm_struct *mm)
{
BUG_ON(!hlist_empty(&mm->mmu_notifier_mm->list));
+ cleanup_srcu_struct(&mm->mmu_notifier_mm->srcu);
kfree(mm->mmu_notifier_mm);
mm->mmu_notifier_mm = LIST_POISON1; /* debug */
}
@@ -309,7 +321,7 @@ void mmu_notifier_unregister(struct mmu_notifier *mn, struct mm_struct *mm)
* Wait any running method to finish, of course including
* ->release if it was run by mmu_notifier_relase instead of us.
*/
- synchronize_rcu();
+ synchronize_srcu(&mm->mmu_notifier_mm->srcu);
BUG_ON(atomic_read(&mm->mm_count) <= 0);
--
1.7.8.2
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next reply other threads:[~2012-02-06 14:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-06 14:40 sagig [this message]
2012-02-08 10:59 ` sagig
2012-02-08 11:14 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4f2fe67e.e54cb40a.5700.ffff8fdf@mx.google.com \
--to=sagig@mellanox.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ogerlitz@mellanox.com \
--cc=oren@mellanox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox