linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sagig@mellanox.com
To: aarcange@redhat.com
Cc: ogerlitz@mellanox.com, oren@mellanox.com, gleb@redhat.com,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: [PATCH RFC V2] mm: convert rcu_read_lock() to srcu_read_lock(), thus allowing to sleep in callbacks
Date: Mon,  6 Feb 2012 16:40:54 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4f2fe67e.e54cb40a.5700.ffff8fdf@mx.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <y>

From: Sagi Grimberg <sagig@mellanox.co.il>

Now that anon_vma lock and i_mmap_mutex are both sleepable mutex, it is possible to schedule inside invalidation callbacks
(such as invalidate_page, invalidate_range_start/end and change_pte) .
This is essential for a scheduling HW sync in RDMA drivers which apply on demand paging methods.

Signed-off-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagig@mellanox.co.il>
---
 changes from V1:
 1. converted synchronize_rcu() to synchronize_srcu() to racing candidates (unregister, release)
 2. do_mmu_notifier_register: moved init_srcu_struct out of mmap_sem locking.
 3. do_mmu_notifier_register: fixed error path.

 include/linux/mmu_notifier.h |    3 +++
 mm/mmu_notifier.c            |   38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/mmu_notifier.h b/include/linux/mmu_notifier.h
index 1d1b1e1..f3d6f30 100644
--- a/include/linux/mmu_notifier.h
+++ b/include/linux/mmu_notifier.h
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
 #include <linux/list.h>
 #include <linux/spinlock.h>
 #include <linux/mm_types.h>
+#include <linux/srcu.h>
 
 struct mmu_notifier;
 struct mmu_notifier_ops;
@@ -21,6 +22,8 @@ struct mmu_notifier_mm {
 	struct hlist_head list;
 	/* to serialize the list modifications and hlist_unhashed */
 	spinlock_t lock;
+	/* to enable sleeping in callbacks */
+	struct srcu_struct srcu;
 };
 
 struct mmu_notifier_ops {
diff --git a/mm/mmu_notifier.c b/mm/mmu_notifier.c
index 9a611d3..7267fb2 100644
--- a/mm/mmu_notifier.c
+++ b/mm/mmu_notifier.c
@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ void __mmu_notifier_release(struct mm_struct *mm)
 	spin_unlock(&mm->mmu_notifier_mm->lock);
 
 	/*
-	 * synchronize_rcu here prevents mmu_notifier_release to
+	 * synchronize_srcu here prevents mmu_notifier_release to
 	 * return to exit_mmap (which would proceed freeing all pages
 	 * in the mm) until the ->release method returns, if it was
 	 * invoked by mmu_notifier_unregister.
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ void __mmu_notifier_release(struct mm_struct *mm)
 	 * The mmu_notifier_mm can't go away from under us because one
 	 * mm_count is hold by exit_mmap.
 	 */
-	synchronize_rcu();
+	synchronize_srcu(&mm->mmu_notifier_mm->srcu);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -123,10 +123,11 @@ int __mmu_notifier_test_young(struct mm_struct *mm,
 void __mmu_notifier_change_pte(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address,
 			       pte_t pte)
 {
+	int idx;
 	struct mmu_notifier *mn;
 	struct hlist_node *n;
 
-	rcu_read_lock();
+	idx = srcu_read_lock(&mm->mmu_notifier_mm->srcu);
 	hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(mn, n, &mm->mmu_notifier_mm->list, hlist) {
 		if (mn->ops->change_pte)
 			mn->ops->change_pte(mn, mm, address, pte);
@@ -137,49 +138,52 @@ void __mmu_notifier_change_pte(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address,
 		else if (mn->ops->invalidate_page)
 			mn->ops->invalidate_page(mn, mm, address);
 	}
-	rcu_read_unlock();
+	srcu_read_unlock(&mm->mmu_notifier_mm->srcu, idx);
 }
 
 void __mmu_notifier_invalidate_page(struct mm_struct *mm,
 					  unsigned long address)
 {
+	int idx;
 	struct mmu_notifier *mn;
 	struct hlist_node *n;
 
-	rcu_read_lock();
+	idx = srcu_read_lock(&mm->mmu_notifier_mm->srcu);
 	hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(mn, n, &mm->mmu_notifier_mm->list, hlist) {
 		if (mn->ops->invalidate_page)
 			mn->ops->invalidate_page(mn, mm, address);
 	}
-	rcu_read_unlock();
+	srcu_read_unlock(&mm->mmu_notifier_mm->srcu, idx);
 }
 
 void __mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(struct mm_struct *mm,
 				  unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
 {
+	int idx;
 	struct mmu_notifier *mn;
 	struct hlist_node *n;
 
-	rcu_read_lock();
+	idx = srcu_read_lock(&mm->mmu_notifier_mm->srcu);
 	hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(mn, n, &mm->mmu_notifier_mm->list, hlist) {
 		if (mn->ops->invalidate_range_start)
 			mn->ops->invalidate_range_start(mn, mm, start, end);
 	}
-	rcu_read_unlock();
+	srcu_read_unlock(&mm->mmu_notifier_mm->srcu, idx);
 }
 
 void __mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end(struct mm_struct *mm,
 				  unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
 {
+	int idx;
 	struct mmu_notifier *mn;
 	struct hlist_node *n;
 
-	rcu_read_lock();
+	idx = srcu_read_lock(&mm->mmu_notifier_mm->srcu);
 	hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(mn, n, &mm->mmu_notifier_mm->list, hlist) {
 		if (mn->ops->invalidate_range_end)
 			mn->ops->invalidate_range_end(mn, mm, start, end);
 	}
-	rcu_read_unlock();
+	srcu_read_unlock(&mm->mmu_notifier_mm->srcu, idx);
 }
 
 static int do_mmu_notifier_register(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
@@ -196,6 +200,9 @@ static int do_mmu_notifier_register(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
 	if (unlikely(!mmu_notifier_mm))
 		goto out;
 
+	if (init_srcu_struct(&mmu_notifier_mm->srcu))
+		goto out_cleanup;
+
 	if (take_mmap_sem)
 		down_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
 	ret = mm_take_all_locks(mm);
@@ -226,8 +233,12 @@ static int do_mmu_notifier_register(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
 out_cleanup:
 	if (take_mmap_sem)
 		up_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
-	/* kfree() does nothing if mmu_notifier_mm is NULL */
-	kfree(mmu_notifier_mm);
+
+	if (mm->mmu_notifier_mm) {
+		/* in the case srcu_init failed srcu_cleanup is safe */
+		cleanup_srcu_struct(&mm->mmu_notifier_mm->srcu);
+		kfree(mmu_notifier_mm);
+	}
 out:
 	BUG_ON(atomic_read(&mm->mm_users) <= 0);
 	return ret;
@@ -266,6 +277,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__mmu_notifier_register);
 void __mmu_notifier_mm_destroy(struct mm_struct *mm)
 {
 	BUG_ON(!hlist_empty(&mm->mmu_notifier_mm->list));
+	cleanup_srcu_struct(&mm->mmu_notifier_mm->srcu);
 	kfree(mm->mmu_notifier_mm);
 	mm->mmu_notifier_mm = LIST_POISON1; /* debug */
 }
@@ -309,7 +321,7 @@ void mmu_notifier_unregister(struct mmu_notifier *mn, struct mm_struct *mm)
 	 * Wait any running method to finish, of course including
 	 * ->release if it was run by mmu_notifier_relase instead of us.
 	 */
-	synchronize_rcu();
+	synchronize_srcu(&mm->mmu_notifier_mm->srcu);
 
 	BUG_ON(atomic_read(&mm->mm_count) <= 0);
 
-- 
1.7.8.2

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

             reply	other threads:[~2012-02-06 14:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-02-06 14:40 sagig [this message]
2012-02-08 10:59 ` sagig
2012-02-08 11:14   ` Konstantin Khlebnikov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4f2fe67e.e54cb40a.5700.ffff8fdf@mx.google.com \
    --to=sagig@mellanox.com \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=gleb@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=ogerlitz@mellanox.com \
    --cc=oren@mellanox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox