From: "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@kernel.org>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>,
Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, virtualization@lists.linux.dev,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>, Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 2/9] mm: page_reporting: skip redundant zeroing of host-zeroed reported pages
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2026 10:15:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4e1b349b-d0df-4ad5-8050-9a2b3b3831ac@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260413040143-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
On 4/13/26 10:10, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2026 at 10:00:58AM +0200, David Hildenbrand (Arm) wrote:
>> On 4/13/26 00:50, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>> When a guest reports free pages to the hypervisor via the page reporting
>>> framework (used by virtio-balloon and hv_balloon), the host typically
>>> zeros those pages when reclaiming their backing memory. However, when
>>> those pages are later allocated in the guest, post_alloc_hook()
>>> unconditionally zeros them again if __GFP_ZERO is set. This
>>> double-zeroing is wasteful, especially for large pages.
>>>
>>> Avoid redundant zeroing by propagating the "host already zeroed this"
>>> information through the allocation path:
>>>
>>> 1. Add a host_zeroes_pages flag to page_reporting_dev_info, allowing
>>> drivers to declare that their host zeros reported pages on reclaim.
>>> A static key (page_reporting_host_zeroes) gates the fast path.
>>>
>>> 2. In page_del_and_expand(), when the page was reported and the
>>> static key is enabled, stash a sentinel value (MAGIC_PAGE_ZEROED)
>>> in page->private.
>>>
>>> 3. In post_alloc_hook(), check page->private for the sentinel. If
>>> present and zeroing was requested (but not tag zeroing), skip
>>> kernel_init_pages().
>>>
>>> In particular, __GFP_ZERO is used by the x86 arch override of
>>> vma_alloc_zeroed_movable_folio.
>>>
>>> No driver sets host_zeroes_pages yet; a follow-up patch to
>>> virtio_balloon is needed to opt in.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
>>> Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-4-6
>>> ---
>>> include/linux/mm.h | 6 ++++++
>>> include/linux/page_reporting.h | 3 +++
>>> mm/page_alloc.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
>>> mm/page_reporting.c | 9 +++++++++
>>> mm/page_reporting.h | 2 ++
>>> 5 files changed, 41 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
>>> index 5be3d8a8f806..59fc77c4c90e 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/mm.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
>>> @@ -4814,6 +4814,12 @@ static inline bool user_alloc_needs_zeroing(void)
>>> &init_on_alloc);
>>> }
>>>
>>> +/*
>>> + * Sentinel stored in page->private to indicate the page was pre-zeroed
>>> + * by the hypervisor (via free page reporting).
>>> + */
>>> +#define MAGIC_PAGE_ZEROED 0x5A45524FU /* ZERO */
>>
>> Why are we not using another page flag that is yet unused for buddy pages?
>
> Because we need to report the status *after* it left buddy.
> And all flags are in use at that point.
I'll comment on that on the other patch, where __GFP_PREZEROED, which I
really hate, is added.
>
>
>> Using page->private for that, and exposing it to buddy users with the
>> __GFP_PREZEROED flag (I hope we can avoid that) does not sound
>> particularly elegant.
>
> But propagating this all over mm does not sound too palatable, right?
> There's precedent with MAGIC_HWPOISON already.
> Better ideas? Thanks!
I'll comment on the __GFP_PREZEROED patch.
>
>> Also, if we're going to remember that some pages in the buddy are
>> pre-zeroed, it should better not be free-page-reporting specific.
>> I'd assume ordinary inflating+deflating of the balloon would also end up
>> with pre-zeroed pages. We'd just need a (mm/balloon.c -specific)
>> interface to tell the buddy that the pages are zeroed.
>>
>
> Indeed, it's also easily possible - it's a separate optimization, though.
> Another simple enhancement is including hugetlbfs freelists in page
> reporting.
> Doesn't need to block this patchset though, right?
Not blocking, but I don't want something that is too coupled to
free-page reporting optimizations in the buddy. The comment above
MAGIC_PAGE_ZEROED triggered my reaction.
--
Cheers,
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-13 8:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-12 22:50 [PATCH RFC 0/9] mm/virtio: " Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-04-12 22:50 ` [PATCH RFC 1/9] mm: page_alloc: propagate PageReported flag across buddy splits Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-04-12 22:50 ` [PATCH RFC 2/9] mm: page_reporting: skip redundant zeroing of host-zeroed reported pages Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-04-13 8:00 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-04-13 8:10 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-04-13 8:15 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm) [this message]
2026-04-13 8:29 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-04-12 22:50 ` [PATCH RFC 3/9] mm: add __GFP_PREZEROED flag and folio_test_clear_prezeroed() Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-04-13 9:05 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-04-12 22:50 ` [PATCH RFC 4/9] mm: skip zeroing in vma_alloc_zeroed_movable_folio for pre-zeroed pages Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-04-12 22:50 ` [PATCH RFC 5/9] mm: skip zeroing in alloc_anon_folio " Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-04-12 22:50 ` [PATCH RFC 6/9] mm: skip zeroing in vma_alloc_anon_folio_pmd " Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-04-12 22:51 ` [PATCH RFC 7/9] mm: hugetlb: skip zeroing of pre-zeroed hugetlb pages Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-04-12 22:51 ` [PATCH RFC 8/9] mm: page_reporting: add flush parameter to trigger immediate reporting Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-04-12 22:51 ` [PATCH RFC 9/9] virtio_balloon: a hack to enable host-zeroed page optimization Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4e1b349b-d0df-4ad5-8050-9a2b3b3831ac@kernel.org \
--to=david@kernel.org \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=jackmanb@google.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox