From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>,
mkoutny@suse.com, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm,memory_hotplug: Implement numa node notifier
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2025 18:03:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4e122668-6f6a-4874-85df-e6869b9ccb24@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250401092716.537512-2-osalvador@suse.de>
On 4/1/25 11:27, Oscar Salvador wrote:
> There are at least four consumers of hotplug_memory_notifier that what they
> really are interested in is whether any numa node changed its state, e.g: going
> from being memory aware to becoming memoryless.
>
> Implement a specific notifier for numa nodes when their state gets changed,
> and have those consumers that only care about numa node state changes use it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
<snip>
> -static void node_states_set_node(int node, struct memory_notify *arg)
> +static void node_states_set_node(int node, struct node_notify *arg)
> {
> if (arg->status_change_nid_normal >= 0)
> node_set_state(node, N_NORMAL_MEMORY);
> @@ -1177,7 +1177,9 @@ int online_pages(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long nr_pages,
> int need_zonelists_rebuild = 0;
> const int nid = zone_to_nid(zone);
> int ret;
> - struct memory_notify arg;
> + struct memory_notify mem_arg;
> + struct node_notify node_arg;
> + bool cancel_mem_notifier_on_err = false, cancel_node_notifier_on_err = false;
>
> /*
> * {on,off}lining is constrained to full memory sections (or more
> @@ -1194,11 +1196,23 @@ int online_pages(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long nr_pages,
> /* associate pfn range with the zone */
> move_pfn_range_to_zone(zone, pfn, nr_pages, NULL, MIGRATE_ISOLATE);
>
> - arg.start_pfn = pfn;
> - arg.nr_pages = nr_pages;
> - node_states_check_changes_online(nr_pages, zone, &arg);
> + mem_arg.start_pfn = pfn;
> + mem_arg.nr_pages = nr_pages;
> + node_states_check_changes_online(nr_pages, zone, &node_arg);
>
> - ret = memory_notify(MEM_GOING_ONLINE, &arg);
> + if (node_arg.status_change_nid >= 0) {
Hmm, don't we need to add "|| node_arg.status_change_nid_normal >= 0"? Or we
fail to notify addition of normal memory to a node that already has !normal
memory?
> + /* Node is becoming memory aware. Notify consumers */
> + cancel_node_notifier_on_err = true;
> + ret = node_notify(NODE_BECOMING_MEM_AWARE, &node_arg);
> + ret = notifier_to_errno(ret);
> + if (ret)
> + goto failed_addition;
> + }
> +
> + cancel_mem_notifier_on_err = true;
> + mem_arg.status_change_nid = node_arg.status_change_nid;
> + mem_arg.status_change_nid_normal = node_arg.status_change_nid_normal;
> + ret = memory_notify(MEM_GOING_ONLINE, &mem_arg);
> ret = notifier_to_errno(ret);
> if (ret)
> goto failed_addition;
> @@ -1224,7 +1238,7 @@ int online_pages(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long nr_pages,
> online_pages_range(pfn, nr_pages);
> adjust_present_page_count(pfn_to_page(pfn), group, nr_pages);
>
> - node_states_set_node(nid, &arg);
> + node_states_set_node(nid, &node_arg);
> if (need_zonelists_rebuild)
> build_all_zonelists(NULL);
>
> @@ -1245,16 +1259,26 @@ int online_pages(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long nr_pages,
> kswapd_run(nid);
> kcompactd_run(nid);
>
> + if (node_arg.status_change_nid >= 0)
> + /*
> + * Node went from memoryless to have memory. Notifiy interested
> + * consumers
> + */
> + node_notify(NODE_BECAME_MEM_AWARE, &node_arg);
> +
> writeback_set_ratelimit();
>
> - memory_notify(MEM_ONLINE, &arg);
> + memory_notify(MEM_ONLINE, &mem_arg);
> return 0;
>
> failed_addition:
> pr_debug("online_pages [mem %#010llx-%#010llx] failed\n",
> (unsigned long long) pfn << PAGE_SHIFT,
> (((unsigned long long) pfn + nr_pages) << PAGE_SHIFT) - 1);
> - memory_notify(MEM_CANCEL_ONLINE, &arg);
> + if (cancel_node_notifier_on_err)
> + node_notify(NODE_CANCEL_MEM_AWARE, &node_arg);
> + if (cancel_mem_notifier_on_err)
> + memory_notify(MEM_CANCEL_ONLINE, &mem_arg);
Switch the order of those just for symmetry? :)
> remove_pfn_range_from_zone(zone, pfn, nr_pages);
> return ret;
> }
> @@ -1898,7 +1922,7 @@ early_param("movable_node", cmdline_parse_movable_node);
>
> /* check which state of node_states will be changed when offline memory */
> static void node_states_check_changes_offline(unsigned long nr_pages,
> - struct zone *zone, struct memory_notify *arg)
> + struct zone *zone, struct node_notify *arg)
> {
> struct pglist_data *pgdat = zone->zone_pgdat;
> unsigned long present_pages = 0;
> @@ -1935,7 +1959,7 @@ static void node_states_check_changes_offline(unsigned long nr_pages,
> arg->status_change_nid = zone_to_nid(zone);
> }
>
> -static void node_states_clear_node(int node, struct memory_notify *arg)
> +static void node_states_clear_node(int node, struct node_notify *arg)
> {
> if (arg->status_change_nid_normal >= 0)
> node_clear_state(node, N_NORMAL_MEMORY);
> @@ -1963,7 +1987,9 @@ int offline_pages(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long nr_pages,
> unsigned long pfn, managed_pages, system_ram_pages = 0;
> const int node = zone_to_nid(zone);
> unsigned long flags;
> - struct memory_notify arg;
> + struct memory_notify mem_arg;
> + struct node_notify node_arg;
> + bool cancel_mem_notifier_on_err = false, cancel_node_notifier_on_err = false;
> char *reason;
> int ret;
>
> @@ -2022,11 +2048,22 @@ int offline_pages(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long nr_pages,
> goto failed_removal_pcplists_disabled;
> }
>
> - arg.start_pfn = start_pfn;
> - arg.nr_pages = nr_pages;
> - node_states_check_changes_offline(nr_pages, zone, &arg);
> + mem_arg.start_pfn = start_pfn;
> + mem_arg.nr_pages = nr_pages;
> + node_states_check_changes_offline(nr_pages, zone, &node_arg);
> +
> + if (node_arg.status_change_nid >= 0) {
Ditto.
> + cancel_node_notifier_on_err = true;
> + ret = node_notify(NODE_BECOMING_MEMORYLESS, &node_arg);
> + ret = notifier_to_errno(ret);
> + if (ret)
> + goto failed_removal_isolated;
> + }
>
> - ret = memory_notify(MEM_GOING_OFFLINE, &arg);
> + cancel_mem_notifier_on_err = true;
> + mem_arg.status_change_nid = node_arg.status_change_nid;
> + mem_arg.status_change_nid_normal = node_arg.status_change_nid_normal;
> + ret = memory_notify(MEM_GOING_OFFLINE, &mem_arg);
> ret = notifier_to_errno(ret);
> if (ret) {
> reason = "notifier failure";
> @@ -2106,27 +2143,32 @@ int offline_pages(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long nr_pages,
> * Make sure to mark the node as memory-less before rebuilding the zone
> * list. Otherwise this node would still appear in the fallback lists.
> */
> - node_states_clear_node(node, &arg);
> + node_states_clear_node(node, &node_arg);
> if (!populated_zone(zone)) {
> zone_pcp_reset(zone);
> build_all_zonelists(NULL);
> }
>
> - if (arg.status_change_nid >= 0) {
> + if (node_arg.status_change_nid >= 0) {
> kcompactd_stop(node);
> kswapd_stop(node);
> + /*Node went memoryless. Notifiy interested consumers */
> + node_notify(NODE_BECAME_MEMORYLESS, &node_arg);
> }
>
> writeback_set_ratelimit();
>
> - memory_notify(MEM_OFFLINE, &arg);
> + memory_notify(MEM_OFFLINE, &mem_arg);
> remove_pfn_range_from_zone(zone, start_pfn, nr_pages);
> return 0;
>
> failed_removal_isolated:
> /* pushback to free area */
> undo_isolate_page_range(start_pfn, end_pfn, MIGRATE_MOVABLE);
> - memory_notify(MEM_CANCEL_OFFLINE, &arg);
> + if (cancel_node_notifier_on_err)
> + node_notify(NODE_CANCEL_MEMORYLESS, &node_arg);
> + if (cancel_mem_notifier_on_err)
> + memory_notify(MEM_CANCEL_OFFLINE, &mem_arg);
Ditto.
> failed_removal_pcplists_disabled:
> lru_cache_enable();
> zone_pcp_enable(zone);
> diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
> index 184fd2b14758..74350f6c8ddd 100644
> --- a/mm/slub.c
> +++ b/mm/slub.c
> @@ -5928,10 +5928,10 @@ static int slab_mem_going_offline_callback(void *arg)
>
> static void slab_mem_offline_callback(void *arg)
> {
> - struct memory_notify *marg = arg;
> + struct node_notify *narg = arg;
> int offline_node;
>
> - offline_node = marg->status_change_nid_normal;
> + offline_node = narg->status_change_nid_normal;
>
> /*
> * If the node still has available memory. we need kmem_cache_node
> @@ -5954,8 +5954,8 @@ static int slab_mem_going_online_callback(void *arg)
> {
> struct kmem_cache_node *n;
> struct kmem_cache *s;
> - struct memory_notify *marg = arg;
> - int nid = marg->status_change_nid_normal;
> + struct node_notify *narg = arg;
> + int nid = narg->status_change_nid_normal;
> int ret = 0;
>
> /*
> @@ -6007,18 +6007,18 @@ static int slab_memory_callback(struct notifier_block *self,
> int ret = 0;
>
> switch (action) {
> - case MEM_GOING_ONLINE:
> + case NODE_BECOMING_MEM_AWARE:
> ret = slab_mem_going_online_callback(arg);
> break;
> - case MEM_GOING_OFFLINE:
> + case NODE_BECOMING_MEMORYLESS:
> ret = slab_mem_going_offline_callback(arg);
> break;
> - case MEM_OFFLINE:
> - case MEM_CANCEL_ONLINE:
> + case NODE_BECAME_MEMORYLESS:
> + case NODE_CANCEL_MEM_AWARE:
> slab_mem_offline_callback(arg);
> break;
> - case MEM_ONLINE:
> - case MEM_CANCEL_OFFLINE:
> + case NODE_BECAME_MEM_AWARE:
> + case NODE_CANCEL_MEMORYLESS:
> break;
> }
> if (ret)
> @@ -6094,7 +6094,7 @@ void __init kmem_cache_init(void)
> sizeof(struct kmem_cache_node),
> SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN | SLAB_NO_OBJ_EXT, 0, 0);
>
> - hotplug_memory_notifier(slab_memory_callback, SLAB_CALLBACK_PRI);
> + hotplug_node_notifier(slab_memory_callback, SLAB_CALLBACK_PRI);
>
> /* Able to allocate the per node structures */
> slab_state = PARTIAL;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-02 16:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-01 9:27 [PATCH 0/2] " Oscar Salvador
2025-04-01 9:27 ` [PATCH 1/2] mm,memory_hotplug: " Oscar Salvador
2025-04-01 14:19 ` Harry Yoo
2025-04-02 16:03 ` Vlastimil Babka [this message]
2025-04-02 16:57 ` Oscar Salvador
2025-04-03 12:44 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-04-04 10:09 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-04-04 12:56 ` Oscar Salvador
2025-04-04 13:14 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-04-01 9:27 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm,memory_hotplug: Replace status_change_nid parameter in memory_notify Oscar Salvador
2025-04-02 2:53 ` Harry Yoo
2025-04-02 16:09 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-04-02 16:06 ` [PATCH 0/2] Implement numa node notifier Vlastimil Babka
2025-04-02 17:03 ` Oscar Salvador
2025-04-03 13:02 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-04-03 13:08 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-04-03 13:57 ` Harry Yoo
2025-04-04 8:47 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-04-03 22:06 ` Harry Yoo
2025-04-04 8:50 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-04-04 10:02 ` Harry Yoo
2025-04-03 12:29 ` Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4e122668-6f6a-4874-85df-e6869b9ccb24@suse.cz \
--to=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=42.hyeyoo@gmail.com \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox