From: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>, Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>,
Glauber Costa <glommer@gmail.com>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH -mm v2 4/9] memcg: rename some cache id related variables
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 14:37:35 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4e10505f6d6f468f3f336863a2085649c91e6245.1414145863.git.vdavydov@parallels.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1414145862.git.vdavydov@parallels.com>
memcg_limited_groups_array_size, which defines the size of memcg_caches
arrays, sounds rather cumbersome. Also it doesn't point anyhow that it's
related to kmem/caches stuff. So let's rename it to memcg_max_cache_ids.
It's concise and points us directly to memcg_cache_id.
Also, rename kmem_limited_groups to memcg_cache_ida, because it's not a
container for groups, but the memcg_cache_id allocator.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com>
---
include/linux/memcontrol.h | 9 +++++++--
mm/memcontrol.c | 19 +++++++++----------
mm/slab_common.c | 4 ++--
3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
index a592fe75192b..e1a894c1018f 100644
--- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
+++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
@@ -391,7 +391,12 @@ static inline void sock_release_memcg(struct sock *sk)
#ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM
extern struct static_key memcg_kmem_enabled_key;
-extern int memcg_limited_groups_array_size;
+/*
+ * The maximal number of kmem-active memory cgroups that can exist on the
+ * system. May grow, but never shrinks. The value returned by memcg_cache_id()
+ * is always less.
+ */
+extern int memcg_max_cache_ids;
/*
* Helper macro to loop through all memcg-specific caches. Callers must still
@@ -399,7 +404,7 @@ extern int memcg_limited_groups_array_size;
* the slab_mutex must be held when looping through those caches
*/
#define for_each_memcg_cache_index(_idx) \
- for ((_idx) = 0; (_idx) < memcg_limited_groups_array_size; (_idx)++)
+ for ((_idx) = 0; (_idx) < memcg_max_cache_ids; (_idx)++)
static inline bool memcg_kmem_enabled(void)
{
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index aa7c1d7b0376..fc1e2067a4c4 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -589,12 +589,11 @@ static void disarm_sock_keys(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
* memcgs, and none but the 200th is kmem-limited, we'd have to have a
* 200 entry array for that.
*
- * The current size of the caches array is stored in
- * memcg_limited_groups_array_size. It will double each time we have to
- * increase it.
+ * The current size of the caches array is stored in memcg_max_cache_ids. It
+ * will double each time we have to increase it.
*/
-static DEFINE_IDA(kmem_limited_groups);
-int memcg_limited_groups_array_size;
+static DEFINE_IDA(memcg_cache_ida);
+int memcg_max_cache_ids;
/*
* MIN_SIZE is different than 1, because we would like to avoid going through
@@ -2588,12 +2587,12 @@ static int memcg_alloc_cache_id(void)
int id, size;
int err;
- id = ida_simple_get(&kmem_limited_groups,
+ id = ida_simple_get(&memcg_cache_ida,
0, MEMCG_CACHES_MAX_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
if (id < 0)
return id;
- if (id < memcg_limited_groups_array_size)
+ if (id < memcg_max_cache_ids)
return id;
/*
@@ -2612,7 +2611,7 @@ static int memcg_alloc_cache_id(void)
mutex_unlock(&memcg_slab_mutex);
if (err) {
- ida_simple_remove(&kmem_limited_groups, id);
+ ida_simple_remove(&memcg_cache_ida, id);
return err;
}
return id;
@@ -2620,7 +2619,7 @@ static int memcg_alloc_cache_id(void)
static void memcg_free_cache_id(int id)
{
- ida_simple_remove(&kmem_limited_groups, id);
+ ida_simple_remove(&memcg_cache_ida, id);
}
/*
@@ -2630,7 +2629,7 @@ static void memcg_free_cache_id(int id)
*/
void memcg_update_array_size(int num)
{
- memcg_limited_groups_array_size = num;
+ memcg_max_cache_ids = num;
}
static void memcg_register_cache(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
diff --git a/mm/slab_common.c b/mm/slab_common.c
index 406944207b61..41fe0ad199f2 100644
--- a/mm/slab_common.c
+++ b/mm/slab_common.c
@@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ static int memcg_alloc_cache_params(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
if (!memcg) {
size = offsetof(struct memcg_cache_params, memcg_caches);
- size += memcg_limited_groups_array_size * sizeof(void *);
+ size += memcg_max_cache_ids * sizeof(void *);
} else
size = sizeof(struct memcg_cache_params);
@@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ static int memcg_update_cache_params(struct kmem_cache *s, int num_memcgs)
cur_params = s->memcg_params;
memcpy(new_params->memcg_caches, cur_params->memcg_caches,
- memcg_limited_groups_array_size * sizeof(void *));
+ memcg_max_cache_ids * sizeof(void *));
new_params->is_root_cache = true;
--
1.7.10.4
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-24 10:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-24 10:37 [PATCH -mm v2 0/9] Per memcg slab shrinkers Vladimir Davydov
2014-10-24 10:37 ` [PATCH -mm v2 1/9] list_lru: introduce list_lru_shrink_{count,walk} Vladimir Davydov
2014-10-24 10:37 ` [PATCH -mm v2 2/9] fs: consolidate {nr,free}_cached_objects args in shrink_control Vladimir Davydov
2014-10-24 10:37 ` [PATCH -mm v2 3/9] vmscan: shrink slab on memcg pressure Vladimir Davydov
2014-11-06 15:21 ` Johannes Weiner
2014-11-06 15:42 ` Vladimir Davydov
2014-11-10 4:03 ` Dave Chinner
2014-10-24 10:37 ` Vladimir Davydov [this message]
2014-10-24 10:37 ` [PATCH -mm v2 5/9] memcg: add rwsem to sync against memcg_caches arrays relocation Vladimir Davydov
2014-10-24 10:37 ` [PATCH -mm v2 6/9] list_lru: get rid of ->active_nodes Vladimir Davydov
2014-10-24 10:37 ` [PATCH -mm v2 7/9] list_lru: organize all list_lrus to list Vladimir Davydov
2014-10-24 10:37 ` [PATCH -mm v2 8/9] list_lru: introduce per-memcg lists Vladimir Davydov
2014-10-24 10:37 ` [PATCH -mm v2 9/9] fs: make shrinker memcg aware Vladimir Davydov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4e10505f6d6f468f3f336863a2085649c91e6245.1414145863.git.vdavydov@parallels.com \
--to=vdavydov@parallels.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=glommer@gmail.com \
--cc=gthelen@google.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox