linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Anton Salikhmetov" <salikhmetov@gmail.com>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Jakob Oestergaard <jakob@unthought.net>,
	Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC][BUG] updating the ctime and mtime time stamps in msync()
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 03:03:03 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4df4ef0c0801091603y2bf507e1q2b99971c6028d1f3@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080109184141.287189b8@bree.surriel.com>

2008/1/10, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>:
> On Wed, 9 Jan 2008 23:33:40 +0100
> Jakob Oestergaard <jakob@unthought.net> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 05:06:33PM -0500, Rik van Riel wrote:
>
> > > Can we get by with simply updating the ctime and mtime every time msync()
> > > is called, regardless of whether or not the mmaped pages were still dirty
> > > by the time we called msync() ?
> >
> > The update must still happen, eventually, after a write to the mapped region
> > followed by an unmap/close even if no msync is ever called.
> >
> > The msync only serves as a "no later than" deadline. The write to the region
> > triggers the need for the update.
> >
> > At least this is how I read the standard - please feel free to correct me if I
> > am mistaken.
>
> You are absolutely right.  If we wrote dirty pages to disk, the ctime
> and mtime updates must happen no later than msync or close time.
>
> I guess a third possible time (if we want to minimize the number of
> updates) would be when natural syncing of the file data to disk, by
> other things in the VM, would be about to clear the I_DIRTY_PAGES
> flag on the inode.  That way we do not need to remember any special
> "we already flushed all dirty data, but we have not updated the mtime
> and ctime yet" state.
>
> Does this sound reasonable?

No, it doesn't. The msync() system call called with the MS_ASYNC flag
should (the POSIX standard requires that) update the st_ctime and
st_mtime stamps in the same manner as for the MS_SYNC flag. However,
the current implementation of msync() doesn't call the do_fsync()
function for the MS_ASYNC case. The msync() function may be called
with the MS_ASYNC flag before "natural syncing".

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2008-01-10  0:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-01-07 17:54 Anton Salikhmetov, Anton Salikhmetov
2008-01-09 11:32 ` Anton Salikhmetov
2008-01-09 11:47   ` Jakob Oestergaard
2008-01-09 12:22   ` Jakob Oestergaard
2008-01-09 14:41   ` Jesper Juhl
2008-01-09 15:31     ` Anton Salikhmetov
2008-01-09 21:28   ` Peter Staubach
2008-01-09 20:50 ` Rik van Riel
2008-01-09 21:01   ` Klaus S. Madsen
2008-01-09 21:06   ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2008-01-09 22:06     ` Rik van Riel
2008-01-09 22:19       ` Peter Staubach
2008-01-09 22:33       ` Jakob Oestergaard
2008-01-09 23:41         ` Rik van Riel
2008-01-10  0:03           ` Anton Salikhmetov [this message]
2008-01-10  8:51             ` Jakob Oestergaard
2008-01-10 10:53               ` Anton Salikhmetov
2008-01-10 15:45                 ` Rik van Riel
2008-01-10 15:56                   ` Anton Salikhmetov
2008-01-10 16:07                     ` Rik van Riel
2008-01-10 16:40                       ` Anton Salikhmetov
2008-01-10 16:52                         ` Peter Staubach
2008-01-10 16:46                       ` Peter Staubach
2008-01-10 20:48           ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2008-01-10  0:48       ` Anton Salikhmetov
2008-01-10  0:40   ` Anton Salikhmetov
2008-01-09 21:18 ` Peter Staubach

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4df4ef0c0801091603y2bf507e1q2b99971c6028d1f3@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=salikhmetov@gmail.com \
    --cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
    --cc=jakob@unthought.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox