From: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
To: "Thomas Weißschuh" <linux@weissschuh.net>
Cc: "Hugh Dickins" <hughd@google.com>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Thomas Weißschuh" <thomas.weissschuh@amadeus.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tmpfs: ensure O_LARGEFILE with generic_file_open()
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2022 13:27:20 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4d5a721-cffe-cc7-8023-ae86ba35cb7d@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220928104535.61186-1-linux@weissschuh.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1603 bytes --]
On Wed, 28 Sep 2022, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> From: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh@amadeus.com>
>
> Without this check open() will open large files on tmpfs although
> O_LARGEFILE was not specified. This is inconsistent with other
> filesystems.
> Also it will later result in EOVERFLOW on stat() or EFBIG on write().
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/76bedae6-22ea-4abc-8c06-b424ceb39217@t-8ch.de/
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh@amadeus.com>
Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Thanks! I think you deserve some special award for finding and fixing
such an ancient bug/inconsistency - dating back to early v2.4 it seems.
But only affecting 32-bit; and since we've happily lived with it so long,
and the fix does change behaviour for userspace, better not to Cc stable.
There are some other filesystems still behaving as tmpfs was (ramfs,
hugetlbfsi, and I didn't look further); but we do make more of an effort
to keep tmpfs in line with the major filesystems - thank you.
> ---
> mm/shmem.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/mm/shmem.c b/mm/shmem.c
> index 42e5888bf84d..902c5550fabc 100644
> --- a/mm/shmem.c
> +++ b/mm/shmem.c
> @@ -3876,6 +3876,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(shmem_aops);
>
> static const struct file_operations shmem_file_operations = {
> .mmap = shmem_mmap,
> + .open = generic_file_open,
> .get_unmapped_area = shmem_get_unmapped_area,
> #ifdef CONFIG_TMPFS
> .llseek = shmem_file_llseek,
>
> base-commit: f76349cf41451c5c42a99f18a9163377e4b364ff
> --
> 2.37.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-28 20:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-28 10:45 Thomas Weißschuh
2022-09-28 20:27 ` Hugh Dickins [this message]
2022-09-28 21:45 ` Thomas Weißschuh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4d5a721-cffe-cc7-8023-ae86ba35cb7d@google.com \
--to=hughd@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux@weissschuh.net \
--cc=thomas.weissschuh@amadeus.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox