From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: Xianying Wang <wangxianying546@gmail.com>, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: surenb@google.com, mhocko@suse.com, jackmanb@google.com,
hannes@cmpxchg.org, ziy@nvidia.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
"Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] WARNING in __alloc_frozen_pages_noprof
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2025 10:46:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4cb9f727-734b-43fa-92d2-80559df76c84@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOU40uAHO9-59HB2VmCBfC5OiNg3BZBd-32jphtRd-nkvhD6Dg@mail.gmail.com>
+CC perf people as AFAIU the problem originates there. Should the limit
be lowered, or the allocations e.g. switched to kvmalloc, to avoid
requesting impossibly high order allocations?
/*
* There are several places where we assume that the order value is sane
* so bail out early if the request is out of bound.
*/
if (WARN_ON_ONCE_GFP(order > MAX_PAGE_ORDER, gfp))
return NULL;
On 11/19/25 10:07 AM, Xianying Wang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I hit the following warning in the page allocator when opening a perf
> event with callchain sampling after increasing
> kernel.perf_event_max_stack.This warning can be triggered by first
> writing a large value into kernel.perf_event_max_stack and then
> opening a perf event with callchain sampling enabled.
>
> The reproducer does two things:
>
> 1) It writes a large (but still accepted) value to the sysctl:
>
> echo 0x40132 > /proc/sys/kernel/perf_event_max_stack
>
> (0x40132 = 262450 in decimal. This is below the current upper bound
>
> enforced by perf_event_max_stack_handler(), which uses 640 * 1024
>
> as extra2.)
>
> 2) It calls perf_event_open() with callchain sampling:
>
> struct perf_event_attr attr = {
>
> .type = PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE,
>
> .size = sizeof(attr),
>
> .config = PERF_COUNT_HW_CPU_CYCLES,
>
> .sample_type = PERF_SAMPLE_CALLCHAIN,
>
> .sample_period = 1,
>
> .disabled = 1,
>
> };
>
> fd = syscall(__NR_perf_event_open, &attr, -1, 0, -1, 0);
>
> The same warning is reproducible on both v6.17.0 and v6.18-rc2
> (6.18.0-rc2-00120 g6fab32bb6508), only the line numbers in
> __alloc_frozen_pages_noprof() differ slightly.
>
> The suspected cause is that alloc_callchain_buffers() uses
> sysctl_perf_event_max_stack directly when computing the size of the
> per-CPU callchain buffers. For large but valid values of
> kernel.perf_event_max_stack, perf_callchain_entry__sizeof() grows to
> several megabytes, and alloc_callchain_buffers() ends up doing a very
> large contiguous kmalloc_node() per CPU. This high-order allocation
> then triggers the warning in __alloc_frozen_pages_noprof() in the page
> allocator.
>
> This can be reproduced on:
>
> HEAD commit:
>
> e5f0a698b34ed76002dc5cff3804a61c80233a7a
>
> 6fab32bb6508abbb8b7b1c5498e44f0c32320ed5
>
> report: https://pastebin.com/raw/bCq3d4KR
>
> console output : https://pastebin.com/raw/5hfk57Vd
>
> kernel config : https://pastebin.com/raw/1grwrT16
>
> C reproducer :https://pastebin.com/raw/GADWbwKN
>
> Let me know if you need more details or testing.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Xianying
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-26 9:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-19 9:07 Xianying Wang
2025-11-26 9:46 ` Vlastimil Babka [this message]
2025-11-26 11:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-11-26 19:00 ` Namhyung Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4cb9f727-734b-43fa-92d2-80559df76c84@suse.cz \
--to=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jackmanb@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=wangxianying546@gmail.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox