linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
To: "HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)" <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>
Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@linux.dev>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>,
	Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>,
	Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
	Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 4/4] mm, memory_hotplug: fix inconsistent num_poisoned_pages on memory hotremove
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2022 15:16:01 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4cae9c00-a048-2c0a-9a45-d7abb956fde7@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220428040556.GA3945421@hori.linux.bs1.fc.nec.co.jp>

On 2022/4/28 12:05, HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也) wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 11:20:16AM +0800, Miaohe Lin wrote:
>> On 2022/4/27 12:28, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
>>> From: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>
>>>
>>> When offlining memory section with hwpoisoned pages, the hwpoisons are
>>> canceled. But num_poisoned_pages is not updated for that event, so the
>>> counter becomes inconsistent.
>>
>> IIUC, this work is already done via clear_hwpoisoned_pages when __remove_pages.
>> Or am I miss something?
> 
> Actually I had the same question when writing this patch, and found that
> __remove_pages() seems to be called from device memory or HMM, but not from

It seems remove_memory (which calls __remove_pages) will be called as .detach callback of
memory_device_handler in drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c. So the hwpoison info will also be
clear for that memory ?

> offline_pages().  If you mean that we could make offline_pages() call
> clear_hwpoisoned_pages(), that seems possible and I'll consider it.
> 
> But as David and Oscar pointed out for 0/4, removing PageHWPoison flags
> in offlining seems not to be right thing, so I'd like to have some consensus
> on what way to go first.

Agree. We should have some consensus first.

Thanks!

> 
> Thanks,
> Naoya Horiguchi
> 



  reply	other threads:[~2022-04-28  7:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-27  4:28 [RFC PATCH v1 0/4] mm, hwpoison: improve handling workload related to hugetlb and memory_hotplug Naoya Horiguchi
2022-04-27  4:28 ` [RFC PATCH v1 1/4] mm, hwpoison, hugetlb: introduce SUBPAGE_INDEX_HWPOISON to save raw error page Naoya Horiguchi
2022-04-27  7:11   ` Miaohe Lin
2022-04-27 13:03     ` HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)
2022-04-28  3:14       ` Miaohe Lin
2022-05-12 22:31   ` Jane Chu
2022-05-12 22:49     ` HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)
2022-04-27  4:28 ` [RFC PATCH v1 2/4] mm,hwpoison,hugetlb,memory_hotplug: hotremove memory section with hwpoisoned hugepage Naoya Horiguchi
2022-04-29  8:49   ` Miaohe Lin
2022-05-09  7:55     ` HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)
2022-05-09  8:57       ` Miaohe Lin
2022-04-27  4:28 ` [RFC PATCH v1 3/4] mm, hwpoison: add parameter unpoison to get_hwpoison_huge_page() Naoya Horiguchi
2022-04-27  4:28 ` [RFC PATCH v1 4/4] mm, memory_hotplug: fix inconsistent num_poisoned_pages on memory hotremove Naoya Horiguchi
2022-04-28  3:20   ` Miaohe Lin
2022-04-28  4:05     ` HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)
2022-04-28  7:16       ` Miaohe Lin [this message]
2022-05-09 13:34         ` Naoya Horiguchi
2022-04-27 10:48 ` [RFC PATCH v1 0/4] mm, hwpoison: improve handling workload related to hugetlb and memory_hotplug David Hildenbrand
2022-04-27 12:20   ` Oscar Salvador
2022-04-27 12:20   ` HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)
2022-04-28  8:44     ` David Hildenbrand
2022-05-09  7:29       ` HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)
2022-05-09  9:04         ` Miaohe Lin
2022-05-09  9:58           ` Oscar Salvador
2022-05-09 10:53             ` Miaohe Lin
2022-05-11 15:11               ` David Hildenbrand
2022-05-11 16:10                 ` HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)
2022-05-11 16:22                   ` David Hildenbrand
2022-05-12  3:04                     ` Miaohe Lin
2022-05-12  6:35                     ` HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)
2022-05-12  7:28                       ` David Hildenbrand
2022-05-12 11:13                         ` Miaohe Lin
2022-05-12 12:59                           ` David Hildenbrand
2022-05-16  3:25                             ` Miaohe Lin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4cae9c00-a048-2c0a-9a45-d7abb956fde7@huawei.com \
    --to=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
    --cc=naoya.horiguchi@linux.dev \
    --cc=naoya.horiguchi@nec.com \
    --cc=osalvador@suse.de \
    --cc=shy828301@gmail.com \
    --cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox