From: Alexandre Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr>
To: Charlie Jenkins <charlie@rivosinc.com>,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: conor@kernel.org, paul.walmsley@sifive.com, palmer@rivosinc.com,
aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, anup@brainfault.org,
konstantin@linuxfoundation.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
mick@ics.forth.gr, jrtc27@jrtc27.com, rdunlap@infradead.org,
alexghiti@rivosinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/4] RISC-V: mm: Restrict address space for sv39,sv48,sv57
Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2023 11:53:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4c692993-86ab-fdce-8c78-f676cf90e861@ghiti.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230727212647.4182407-2-charlie@rivosinc.com>
On 27/07/2023 23:26, Charlie Jenkins wrote:
> Make sv48 the default address space for mmap as some applications
> currently depend on this assumption. A hint address passed to mmap will
> cause the largest address space that fits entirely into the hint to be
> used. If the hint is less than or equal to 1<<38, an sv39 address will
> be used. An exception is that if the hint address is 0, then a sv48
> address will be used. After an address space is completely full, the next
> smallest address space will be used.
>
> Signed-off-by: Charlie Jenkins <charlie@rivosinc.com>
> ---
> arch/riscv/include/asm/elf.h | 2 +-
> arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h | 20 +++++++++++-
> arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 3 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/elf.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/elf.h
> index c24280774caf..5d3368d5585c 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/elf.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/elf.h
> @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ extern bool compat_elf_check_arch(Elf32_Ehdr *hdr);
> * the loader. We need to make sure that it is out of the way of the program
> * that it will "exec", and that there is sufficient room for the brk.
> */
> -#define ELF_ET_DYN_BASE ((TASK_SIZE / 3) * 2)
> +#define ELF_ET_DYN_BASE ((DEFAULT_MAP_WINDOW / 3) * 2)
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
> #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h
> index 75970ee2bda2..c76a1ef094a4 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h
> @@ -63,8 +63,26 @@
> * position vmemmap directly below the VMALLOC region.
> */
> #ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
> +#define VA_BITS_SV39 39
> +#define VA_BITS_SV48 48
> +#define VA_BITS_SV57 57
> +
> +#define VA_USER_SV39 (UL(1) << (VA_BITS_SV39 - 1))
> +#define VA_USER_SV48 (UL(1) << (VA_BITS_SV48 - 1))
> +#define VA_USER_SV57 (UL(1) << (VA_BITS_SV57 - 1))
> +
> #define VA_BITS (pgtable_l5_enabled ? \
> - 57 : (pgtable_l4_enabled ? 48 : 39))
> + VA_BITS_SV57 : (pgtable_l4_enabled ? VA_BITS_SV48 : VA_BITS_SV39))
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
> +#define MMAP_VA_BITS_64 ((VA_BITS >= VA_BITS_SV48) ? VA_BITS_SV48 : VA_BITS)
> +#define MMAP_MIN_VA_BITS_64 ((VA_BITS >= VA_BITS_SV39) ? VA_BITS_SV39 : VA_BITS)
Here the condition is always true right?
> +#define MMAP_VA_BITS (test_thread_flag(TIF_32BIT) ? 32 : MMAP_VA_BITS_64)
> +#define MMAP_MIN_VA_BITS (test_thread_flag(TIF_32BIT) ? 32 : MMAP_MIN_VA_BITS_64)
I think you should use is_compat_task() here instead of
test_thread_flag(TIF_32BIT). And what about introducing VA_BITS_SV32
instead of hardcoding 32?
> +#else
> +#define MMAP_VA_BITS ((VA_BITS >= VA_BITS_SV48) ? VA_BITS_SV48 : VA_BITS)
> +#define MMAP_MIN_VA_BITS ((VA_BITS >= VA_BITS_SV39) ? VA_BITS_SV39 : VA_BITS)
Ditto here.
> +#endif
> #else
> #define VA_BITS 32
> #endif
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h
> index c950a8d9edef..e810244ea951 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h
> @@ -13,19 +13,59 @@
>
> #include <asm/ptrace.h>
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
> +#define DEFAULT_MAP_WINDOW (UL(1) << (MMAP_VA_BITS - 1))
> +#define STACK_TOP_MAX TASK_SIZE_64
> +
> +#define arch_get_mmap_end(addr, len, flags) \
> +({ \
> + unsigned long mmap_end; \
> + typeof(addr) _addr = (addr); \
> + if ((_addr) == 0 || (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_COMPAT) && test_thread_flag(TIF_32BIT))) \
> + mmap_end = DEFAULT_MAP_WINDOW; \
Wouldn't that prevent a sv57 system to allocate sv57 addresses when sv48
is full unless explicitly asked?
> + else if ((_addr) >= VA_USER_SV57) \
> + mmap_end = STACK_TOP_MAX; \
> + else if ((((_addr) >= VA_USER_SV48)) && (VA_BITS >= VA_BITS_SV48)) \
> + mmap_end = VA_USER_SV48; \
> + else \
> + mmap_end = VA_USER_SV39; \
> + mmap_end; \
> +})
> +
> +#define arch_get_mmap_base(addr, base) \
> +({ \
> + unsigned long mmap_base; \
> + typeof(addr) _addr = (addr); \
> + typeof(base) _base = (base); \
> + unsigned long rnd_gap = (_base) - DEFAULT_MAP_WINDOW; \
> + if ((_addr) == 0 || (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_COMPAT) && test_thread_flag(TIF_32BIT))) \
> + mmap_base = (_base); \
> + else if (((_addr) >= VA_USER_SV57) && (VA_BITS >= VA_BITS_SV57)) \
> + mmap_base = VA_USER_SV57 + rnd_gap; \
Shouldn't it be mmap_base = VA_USER_SV57 - rnd_gap?
> + else if ((((_addr) >= VA_USER_SV48)) && (VA_BITS >= VA_BITS_SV48)) \
> + mmap_base = VA_USER_SV48 + rnd_gap; \
> + else \
> + mmap_base = VA_USER_SV39 + rnd_gap; \
> + mmap_base; \
> +})
> +
> +#else
> +#define DEFAULT_MAP_WINDOW TASK_SIZE
> +#define STACK_TOP_MAX TASK_SIZE
> +#endif
> +#define STACK_ALIGN 16
> +
> +#define STACK_TOP DEFAULT_MAP_WINDOW
> +
> /*
> * This decides where the kernel will search for a free chunk of vm
> * space during mmap's.
> */
> -#define TASK_UNMAPPED_BASE PAGE_ALIGN(TASK_SIZE / 3)
> -
> -#define STACK_TOP TASK_SIZE
> #ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
> -#define STACK_TOP_MAX TASK_SIZE_64
> +#define TASK_UNMAPPED_BASE PAGE_ALIGN((UL(1) << MMAP_MIN_VA_BITS) / 3)
> #else
> -#define STACK_TOP_MAX TASK_SIZE
> +#define TASK_UNMAPPED_BASE PAGE_ALIGN(TASK_SIZE / 3)
> #endif
> -#define STACK_ALIGN 16
>
> #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-06 9:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-27 21:26 [PATCH v8 0/4] RISC-V: mm: Make SV48 the default address space Charlie Jenkins
2023-07-27 21:26 ` [PATCH v8 1/4] RISC-V: mm: Restrict address space for sv39,sv48,sv57 Charlie Jenkins
2023-08-06 9:53 ` Alexandre Ghiti [this message]
2023-08-07 21:12 ` Charlie Jenkins
2023-07-27 21:26 ` [PATCH v8 2/4] RISC-V: mm: Add tests for RISC-V mm Charlie Jenkins
2023-08-06 10:06 ` Alexandre Ghiti
2023-08-07 17:53 ` Charlie Jenkins
2023-07-27 21:26 ` [PATCH v8 3/4] RISC-V: mm: Update pgtable comment documentation Charlie Jenkins
2023-07-27 21:26 ` [PATCH v8 4/4] RISC-V: mm: Document mmap changes Charlie Jenkins
2023-08-06 10:08 ` Alexandre Ghiti
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4c692993-86ab-fdce-8c78-f676cf90e861@ghiti.fr \
--to=alex@ghiti.fr \
--cc=alexghiti@rivosinc.com \
--cc=anup@brainfault.org \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=charlie@rivosinc.com \
--cc=conor@kernel.org \
--cc=jrtc27@jrtc27.com \
--cc=konstantin@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mick@ics.forth.gr \
--cc=palmer@rivosinc.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox