linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Aneesh Kumar K V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
To: "Ritesh Harjani (IBM)" <ritesh.list@gmail.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	mpe@ellerman.id.au, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	npiggin@gmail.com, christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
	Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 14/16] powerpc/book3s64/vmemmap: Switch radix to use a different vmemmap handling function
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2023 09:07:36 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4c6486bb-b81e-b9ac-7728-e8e040b3163f@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87r0pwnzg0.fsf@doe.com>

On 6/28/23 7:03 AM, Ritesh Harjani (IBM) wrote:
> "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com> writes:

....

>> +int __meminit vmemmap_check_pmd(pmd_t *pmd, int node,
>> +				unsigned long addr, unsigned long next)
>> +{
>> +	int large = pmd_large(*pmd);
>> +
>> +	if (pmd_large(*pmd))
> 
> we already got the value of pmd_large into "large" variable.
> we can use just if (large) right?
> 
>> +		vmemmap_verify((pte_t *)pmd, node, addr, next);
> 
> maybe we can use pmdp_ptep() function here which we used in the 1st patch?
> also shouldn't this be pmdp in the function argument instead of pmd?
> 

updated

>> +
>> +	return large;
>> +}
>> +
>> +void __meminit vmemmap_set_pmd(pmd_t *pmdp, void *p, int node,
>> +			       unsigned long addr, unsigned long next)
>> +{
>> +	pte_t entry;
>> +	pte_t *ptep = pmdp_ptep(pmdp);
>> +
>> +	VM_BUG_ON(!IS_ALIGNED(addr, PMD_SIZE));
>> +	entry = pfn_pte(__pa(p) >> PAGE_SHIFT, PAGE_KERNEL);
>> +	set_pte_at(&init_mm, addr, ptep, entry);
>> +	asm volatile("ptesync": : :"memory");
>> +
>> +	vmemmap_verify(ptep, node, addr, next);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static pte_t * __meminit radix__vmemmap_pte_populate(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr, int node,
>> +						     struct vmem_altmap *altmap,
>> +						     struct page *reuse)
>> +{
>> +	pte_t *pte = pte_offset_kernel(pmd, addr);
>> +
>> +	if (pte_none(*pte)) {
>> +		pte_t entry;
>> +		void *p;
>> +
>> +		if (!reuse) {
>> +			/*
>> +			 * make sure we don't create altmap mappings
>> +			 * covering things outside the device.
>> +			 */
>> +			if (altmap && altmap_cross_boundary(altmap, addr, PAGE_SIZE))
>> +				altmap = NULL;
>> +
>> +			p = vmemmap_alloc_block_buf(PAGE_SIZE, node, altmap);
>> +			if (!p) {
>> +				if (altmap)
>> +					p = vmemmap_alloc_block_buf(PAGE_SIZE, node, NULL);
>> +				if (!p)
>> +					return NULL;
>> +			}
> 
> Above if conditions are quite confusing when looking for the 1st time?
> Can we do this? Did I get it right?
> 
>                 if (!p && altmap)
>                   p = vmemmap_alloc_block_buf(PAGE_SIZE, node, NULL);
> 
>                 if (!p)
>                   return NULL;
> 

updated


-aneesh


  reply	other threads:[~2023-06-28  3:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-16 11:08 [PATCH v2 00/16] Add support for DAX vmemmap optimization for ppc64 Aneesh Kumar K.V
2023-06-16 11:08 ` [PATCH v2 01/16] powerpc/mm/book3s64: Use pmdp_ptep helper instead of typecasting Aneesh Kumar K.V
2023-06-16 11:08 ` [PATCH v2 02/16] powerpc/book3s64/mm: mmu_vmemmap_psize is used by radix Aneesh Kumar K.V
2023-06-16 11:08 ` [PATCH v2 03/16] powerpc/book3s64/mm: Fix DirectMap stats in /proc/meminfo Aneesh Kumar K.V
2023-06-16 11:08 ` [PATCH v2 04/16] powerpc/book3s64/mm: Use PAGE_KERNEL instead of opencoding Aneesh Kumar K.V
2023-06-16 11:08 ` [PATCH v2 05/16] powerpc/mm/dax: Fix the condition when checking if altmap vmemap can cross-boundary Aneesh Kumar K.V
2023-06-16 11:08 ` [PATCH v2 06/16] mm/hugepage pud: Allow arch-specific helper function to check huge page pud support Aneesh Kumar K.V
2023-06-16 11:08 ` [PATCH v2 07/16] mm: Change pudp_huge_get_and_clear_full take vm_area_struct as arg Aneesh Kumar K.V
2023-06-16 11:08 ` [PATCH v2 08/16] mm/vmemmap: Improve vmemmap_can_optimize and allow architectures to override Aneesh Kumar K.V
2023-06-20 11:53   ` Joao Martins
2023-06-20 14:29     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2023-06-16 11:08 ` [PATCH v2 09/16] mm/vmemmap: Allow architectures to override how vmemmap optimization works Aneesh Kumar K.V
2023-06-16 11:08 ` [PATCH v2 10/16] mm: Add __HAVE_ARCH_PUD_SAME similar to __HAVE_ARCH_P4D_SAME Aneesh Kumar K.V
2023-06-16 11:08 ` [PATCH v2 11/16] mm/huge pud: Use transparent huge pud helpers only with CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE Aneesh Kumar K.V
2023-06-16 11:08 ` [PATCH v2 12/16] mm/vmemmap optimization: Split hugetlb and devdax vmemmap optimization Aneesh Kumar K.V
2023-06-28  1:09   ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-06-28  3:01     ` Aneesh Kumar K V
2023-06-16 11:08 ` [PATCH v2 13/16] powerpc/book3s64/mm: Enable transparent pud hugepage Aneesh Kumar K.V
2023-06-28  1:23   ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-06-28  3:32     ` Aneesh Kumar K V
2023-06-16 11:08 ` [PATCH v2 14/16] powerpc/book3s64/vmemmap: Switch radix to use a different vmemmap handling function Aneesh Kumar K.V
2023-06-28  1:33   ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-06-28  3:37     ` Aneesh Kumar K V [this message]
2023-06-16 11:08 ` [PATCH v2 15/16] powerpc/book3s64/radix: Add support for vmemmap optimization for radix Aneesh Kumar K.V
2023-06-16 11:08 ` [PATCH v2 16/16] powerpc/book3s64/radix: Remove mmu_vmemmap_psize Aneesh Kumar K.V
2023-06-18 11:54 ` [PATCH v2 00/16] Add support for DAX vmemmap optimization for ppc64 Sachin Sant
2023-06-24 14:52 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2023-06-24 17:22   ` Andrew Morton
2023-07-03  5:26 ` (subset) " Michael Ellerman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4c6486bb-b81e-b9ac-7728-e8e040b3163f@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=joao.m.martins@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=osalvador@suse.de \
    --cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox