From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: Vitaly Wool <vitaly.wool@konsulko.se>, linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>,
Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>,
rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org,
Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 2/4] mm/slub: allow to set node and align in k[v]realloc
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2025 14:52:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4c5852cc-2ca5-432b-8426-01c108df66cb@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250707164908.631462-1-vitaly.wool@konsulko.se>
On 7/7/25 18:49, Vitaly Wool wrote:
> Reimplement k[v]realloc_node() to be able to set node and
> alignment should a user need to do so. In order to do that while
> retaining the maximal backward compatibility, add
> k[v]realloc_node_align() functions and redefine the rest of API
> using these new ones.
>
> With that change we also provide the ability for the Rust part of
> the kernel to set node and alignment in its K[v]xxx
> [re]allocations.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Wool <vitaly.wool@konsulko.se>
> ---
> include/linux/slab.h | 40 ++++++++++++++++++---------
> mm/slub.c | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> 2 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/slab.h b/include/linux/slab.h
> index d5a8ab98035c..13abcf4ada22 100644
> --- a/include/linux/slab.h
> +++ b/include/linux/slab.h
> @@ -465,9 +465,15 @@ int kmem_cache_shrink(struct kmem_cache *s);
> /*
> * Common kmalloc functions provided by all allocators
> */
> -void * __must_check krealloc_noprof(const void *objp, size_t new_size,
> - gfp_t flags) __realloc_size(2);
> -#define krealloc(...) alloc_hooks(krealloc_noprof(__VA_ARGS__))
> +void * __must_check krealloc_node_align_noprof(const void *objp, size_t new_size,
> + unsigned long align,
> + gfp_t flags, int nid) __realloc_size(2);
> +#define krealloc_node_noprof(_p, _s, _f, _n) \
> + krealloc_node_align_noprof(_p, _s, 1, _f, _n)
> +#define krealloc_noprof(...) krealloc_node_noprof(__VA_ARGS__, NUMA_NO_NODE)
> +#define krealloc_node_align(...) alloc_hooks(krealloc_node_align_noprof(__VA_ARGS__))
> +#define krealloc_node(...) alloc_hooks(krealloc_node_noprof(__VA_ARGS__))
> +#define krealloc(...) alloc_hooks(krealloc_noprof(__VA_ARGS__))
Hm wonder if krealloc() and krealloc_node_align() would be enough. Is
krealloc_node() only used between patch 3 and 4?
Also perhaps it would be more concise to only have
krealloc_node_align_noprof() with alloc_hooks wrappers filling the
NUMA_NO_NODE (and 1), so we don't need to #define the _noprof variant of
everything. The _noprof callers are rare so they can just always use
krealloc_node_align_noprof() directly and also fill in the NUMA_NO_NODE (and 1).
> void kfree(const void *objp);
> void kfree_sensitive(const void *objp);
> @@ -1041,18 +1047,23 @@ static inline __alloc_size(1) void *kzalloc_noprof(size_t size, gfp_t flags)
> #define kzalloc(...) alloc_hooks(kzalloc_noprof(__VA_ARGS__))
> #define kzalloc_node(_size, _flags, _node) kmalloc_node(_size, (_flags)|__GFP_ZERO, _node)
>
> -void *__kvmalloc_node_noprof(DECL_BUCKET_PARAMS(size, b), gfp_t flags, int node) __alloc_size(1);
> -#define kvmalloc_node_noprof(size, flags, node) \
> - __kvmalloc_node_noprof(PASS_BUCKET_PARAMS(size, NULL), flags, node)
> +void *__kvmalloc_node_noprof(DECL_BUCKET_PARAMS(size, b), unsigned long align,
> + gfp_t flags, int node) __alloc_size(1);
> +#define kvmalloc_node_align_noprof(_size, _align, _flags, _node) \
> + __kvmalloc_node_noprof(PASS_BUCKET_PARAMS(_size, NULL), _align, _flags, _node)
> +#define kvmalloc_node_noprof(_size, _flags, _node) \
> + kvmalloc_node_align_noprof(_size, 1, _flags, _node)
> +#define kvmalloc_node_align(...) \
> + alloc_hooks(kvmalloc_node_align_noprof(__VA_ARGS__))
> #define kvmalloc_node(...) alloc_hooks(kvmalloc_node_noprof(__VA_ARGS__))
Ditto.
>
> -#define kvmalloc(_size, _flags) kvmalloc_node(_size, _flags, NUMA_NO_NODE)
> -#define kvmalloc_noprof(_size, _flags) kvmalloc_node_noprof(_size, _flags, NUMA_NO_NODE)
> +#define kvmalloc_noprof(...) kvmalloc_node_noprof(__VA_ARGS__, NUMA_NO_NODE)
> +#define kvmalloc(...) alloc_hooks(kvmalloc_noprof(__VA_ARGS__))
> #define kvzalloc(_size, _flags) kvmalloc(_size, (_flags)|__GFP_ZERO)
>
> -#define kvzalloc_node(_size, _flags, _node) kvmalloc_node(_size, (_flags)|__GFP_ZERO, _node)
> +#define kvzalloc_node(_s, _f, _n) kvmalloc_node(_s, (_f)|__GFP_ZERO, _n)
> #define kmem_buckets_valloc(_b, _size, _flags) \
> - alloc_hooks(__kvmalloc_node_noprof(PASS_BUCKET_PARAMS(_size, _b), _flags, NUMA_NO_NODE))
> + alloc_hooks(__kvmalloc_node_noprof(PASS_BUCKET_PARAMS(_size, _b), 1, _flags, NUMA_NO_NODE))
>
> static inline __alloc_size(1, 2) void *
> kvmalloc_array_node_noprof(size_t n, size_t size, gfp_t flags, int node)
> @@ -1068,13 +1079,16 @@ kvmalloc_array_node_noprof(size_t n, size_t size, gfp_t flags, int node)
> #define kvmalloc_array_noprof(...) kvmalloc_array_node_noprof(__VA_ARGS__, NUMA_NO_NODE)
> #define kvcalloc_node_noprof(_n,_s,_f,_node) kvmalloc_array_node_noprof(_n,_s,(_f)|__GFP_ZERO,_node)
> #define kvcalloc_noprof(...) kvcalloc_node_noprof(__VA_ARGS__, NUMA_NO_NODE)
> -
> #define kvmalloc_array(...) alloc_hooks(kvmalloc_array_noprof(__VA_ARGS__))
> #define kvcalloc_node(...) alloc_hooks(kvcalloc_node_noprof(__VA_ARGS__))
> #define kvcalloc(...) alloc_hooks(kvcalloc_noprof(__VA_ARGS__))
>
> -void *kvrealloc_noprof(const void *p, size_t size, gfp_t flags)
> - __realloc_size(2);
> +void *kvrealloc_node_align_noprof(const void *p, size_t size, unsigned long align,
> + gfp_t flags, int nid) __realloc_size(2);
> +#define kvrealloc_node_align(...) kvrealloc_node_align_noprof(__VA_ARGS__)
> +#define kvrealloc_node_noprof(_p, _s, _f, _n) kvrealloc_node_align_noprof(_p, _s, 1, _f, _n)
> +#define kvrealloc_node(...) alloc_hooks(kvrealloc_node_noprof(__VA_ARGS__))
> +#define kvrealloc_noprof(...) kvrealloc_node_noprof(__VA_ARGS__, NUMA_NO_NODE)
> #define kvrealloc(...) alloc_hooks(kvrealloc_noprof(__VA_ARGS__))
Ditto.
> extern void kvfree(const void *addr);
> diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
> index c4b64821e680..881244c357dd 100644
> --- a/mm/slub.c
> +++ b/mm/slub.c
> @@ -4845,7 +4845,7 @@ void kfree(const void *object)
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(kfree);
>
> static __always_inline __realloc_size(2) void *
> -__do_krealloc(const void *p, size_t new_size, gfp_t flags)
> +__do_krealloc(const void *p, size_t new_size, unsigned long align, gfp_t flags, int nid)
> {
> void *ret;
> size_t ks = 0;
> @@ -4859,6 +4859,20 @@ __do_krealloc(const void *p, size_t new_size, gfp_t flags)
> if (!kasan_check_byte(p))
> return NULL;
>
> + /* refuse to proceed if alignment is bigger than what kmalloc() provides */
> + if (!IS_ALIGNED((unsigned long)p, align) || new_size < align)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + /*
> + * If reallocation is not necessary (e. g. the new size is less
> + * than the current allocated size), the current allocation will be
> + * preserved unless __GFP_THISNODE is set. In the latter case a new
> + * allocation on the requested node will be attempted.
> + */
> + if (unlikely(flags & __GFP_THISNODE) && nid != NUMA_NO_NODE &&
> + nid != page_to_nid(vmalloc_to_page(p)))
We need virt_to_page() here not vmalloc_to_page().
> + goto alloc_new;
> +
> if (is_kfence_address(p)) {
> ks = orig_size = kfence_ksize(p);
> } else {
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-08 12:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-07 16:47 [PATCH v11 0/4] support large align and nid in Rust allocators Vitaly Wool
2025-07-07 16:48 ` [PATCH v11 1/4] mm/vmalloc: allow to set node and align in vrealloc Vitaly Wool
2025-07-08 12:12 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-07-07 16:49 ` [PATCH v11 2/4] mm/slub: allow to set node and align in k[v]realloc Vitaly Wool
2025-07-08 12:52 ` Vlastimil Babka [this message]
2025-07-08 14:03 ` Vitaly Wool
2025-07-09 13:40 ` Vitaly Wool
2025-07-09 14:13 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-07-07 16:49 ` [PATCH v11 3/4] rust: add support for NUMA ids in allocations Vitaly Wool
2025-07-08 12:15 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-07-07 16:49 ` [PATCH v11 4/4] rust: support large alignments " Vitaly Wool
2025-07-08 12:16 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-07-08 10:58 ` [PATCH v11 0/4] support large align and nid in Rust allocators Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-07-08 11:12 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-07-08 11:55 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-07-08 12:36 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-07-08 13:41 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-07-08 14:06 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-07-08 13:19 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-07-08 14:16 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-07-08 14:39 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-07-08 15:11 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-07-08 15:40 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-07-09 11:31 ` Alice Ryhl
2025-07-09 12:24 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4c5852cc-2ca5-432b-8426-01c108df66cb@suse.cz \
--to=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=42.hyeyoo@gmail.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aliceryhl@google.com \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
--cc=vitaly.wool@konsulko.se \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox