From: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, mike.kravetz@oracle.com
Cc: mhocko@kernel.org, baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] hugetlb: Replace the obsolete hugetlb_instantiation_mutex in the comments
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2021 14:31:17 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4b3febeae37455ff7b74aa0aad16cc6909cf0926.1634797639.git.baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1634797639.git.baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
In-Reply-To: <cover.1634797639.git.baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
After commit 8382d914ebf7 ("mm, hugetlb: improve page-fault scalability"),
the hugetlb_instantiation_mutex lock had been replaced by
hugetlb_fault_mutex_table to serializes faults on the same logical page.
Thus update the obsolete hugetlb_instantiation_mutex related comments.
Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
---
mm/hugetlb.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
index ee0db48..8902b07 100644
--- a/mm/hugetlb.c
+++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
@@ -5012,7 +5012,7 @@ static void unmap_ref_private(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
/*
* Hugetlb_cow() should be called with page lock of the original hugepage held.
- * Called with hugetlb_instantiation_mutex held and pte_page locked so we
+ * Called with hugetlb_fault_mutex_table held and pte_page locked so we
* cannot race with other handlers or page migration.
* Keep the pte_same checks anyway to make transition from the mutex easier.
*/
--
1.8.3.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-21 6:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-21 6:31 [PATCH 0/4] Some cleanups and improvements for hugetlb Baolin Wang
2021-10-21 6:31 ` [PATCH 1/4] hugetlb_cgroup: Remove unused hugetlb_cgroup_from_counter macro Baolin Wang
2021-10-22 20:16 ` Mike Kravetz
2021-10-21 6:31 ` Baolin Wang [this message]
2021-10-22 20:44 ` [PATCH 2/4] hugetlb: Replace the obsolete hugetlb_instantiation_mutex in the comments Mike Kravetz
2021-10-21 6:31 ` [PATCH 3/4] hugetlb: Remove redundant validation in has_same_uncharge_info() Baolin Wang
2021-10-22 21:04 ` Mike Kravetz
2021-10-21 6:31 ` [PATCH 4/4] hugetlb: Remove redundant VM_BUG_ON() in add_reservation_in_range() Baolin Wang
2021-10-22 23:57 ` Mike Kravetz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4b3febeae37455ff7b74aa0aad16cc6909cf0926.1634797639.git.baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox