On 12/18/25 12:45, Jinjiang Tu wrote:
I encountered a memory leak issue caused by xas_create_range().
collapse_file() calls xas_create_range() to pre-create all slots needed.
If collapse_file() finally fails, these pre-created slots are empty nodes
and aren't destroyed.
I can reproduce it with following steps.
1) create file /tmp/test_madvise_collapse and ftruncate to 4MB size, and then mmap the file
2) memset for the first 2MB
3) madvise(MADV_COLLAPSE) for the second 2MB
4) unlink the file
in 3), collapse_file() calls xas_create_range() to expand xarray depth, and fails to collapse
due to the whole 2M region is empty, the code is as following:
collapse_file()
for (index = start; index < end;) {
xas_set(&xas, index);
folio = xas_load(&xas);
VM_BUG_ON(index != xas.xa_index);
if (is_shmem) {
if (!folio) {
/*
* Stop if extent has been truncated or
* hole-punched, and is now completely
* empty.
*/
if (index == start) {
if (!xas_next_entry(&xas, end - 1)) {
result = SCAN_TRUNCATED;
goto xa_locked;
}
}
...
}
collapse_file() rollback path doesn't destroy the pre-created empty nodes.
When the file is deleted, shmem_evict_inode()->shmem_truncate_range() traverses
all entries and calls xas_store(xas, NULL) to delete, if the leaf xa_node that
stores deleted entry becomes emtry, xas_store() will automatically delete the empty
node and delete it's parent is empty too, until parent node isn't empty. shmem_evict_inode()
won't traverse the empty nodes created by xas_create_range() due to these nodes doesn't store
any entries. As a result, these empty nodes are leaked.
At first, I tried to destory the empty nodes when collapse_file() goes to rollback path. However,
collapse_file() only holds xarray lock and may release the lock, so we couldn't prevent concurrent
call of collapse_file(), so the deleted empty nodes may be needed by other collapse_file() calls.
IIUC, xas_create_range() is used to guarantee the xas_store(&xas, new_folio); succeeds. Could we
remove xas_create_range() call and just rollback when we fail to xas_store?
Hi,
thanks for the report.
Is that what [1] is fixing?
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20251204142625.1763372-1-shardul.b@mpiricsoftware.com/
No, this patch fixes memory leak caused by xas->xa_alloc allocated by xas_nomem() and the xa_node isn't installed into xarray. In my case, the leaked xa_nodes have been installed into xarray by xas_create_range().