From: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
To: Nico Pache <npache@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
ryan.roberts@arm.com, anshuman.khandual@arm.com,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, cl@gentwo.org, vbabka@suse.cz,
mhocko@suse.com, apopple@nvidia.com, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
will@kernel.org, baohua@kernel.org, jack@suse.cz,
srivatsa@csail.mit.edu, haowenchao22@gmail.com, hughd@google.com,
aneesh.kumar@kernel.org, yang@os.amperecomputing.com,
peterx@redhat.com, ioworker0@gmail.com,
wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com, ziy@nvidia.com, jglisse@google.com,
surenb@google.com, vishal.moola@gmail.com, zokeefe@google.com,
zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com, jhubbard@nvidia.com,
21cnbao@gmail.com, willy@infradead.org,
kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com, david@redhat.com,
aarcange@redhat.com, raquini@redhat.com, sunnanyong@huawei.com,
usamaarif642@gmail.com, audra@redhat.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 00/11] khugepaged: mTHP support
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2025 10:26:17 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4ab296ec-5dd2-4d1f-a823-29396cade93e@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA1CXcA8c1nQ+SP9yB6HGZFw7uQMUqz31dV4zYYT-6LDOinvyA@mail.gmail.com>
On 10/01/25 7:57 am, Nico Pache wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 8, 2025 at 11:22 PM Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 09/01/25 5:01 am, Nico Pache wrote:
>>> The following series provides khugepaged and madvise collapse with the
>>> capability to collapse regions to mTHPs.
>>>
>>> To achieve this we generalize the khugepaged functions to no longer depend
>>> on PMD_ORDER. Then during the PMD scan, we keep track of chunks of pages
>>> (defined by MTHP_MIN_ORDER) that are fully utilized. This info is tracked
>>> using a bitmap. After the PMD scan is done, we do binary recursion on the
>>> bitmap to find the optimal mTHP sizes for the PMD range. The restriction
>>> on max_ptes_none is removed during the scan, to make sure we account for
>>> the whole PMD range. max_ptes_none is mapped to a 0-100 range to
>>> determine how full a mTHP order needs to be before collapsing it.
>>>
>>> Some design choices to note:
>>> - bitmap structures are allocated dynamically because on some arch's
>>> (like PowerPC) the value of MTHP_BITMAP_SIZE cannot be computed at
>>> compile time leading to warnings.
>>> - The recursion is masked through a stack structure.
>>> - A MTHP_MIN_ORDER was added to compress the bitmap, and ensure it was
>>> 64bit on x86. This provides some optimization on the bitmap operations.
>>> if other arches/configs that have larger than 512 PTEs per PMD want to
>>> compress their bitmap further we can change this value per arch.
>>>
>>> Patch 1-2: Some refactoring to combine madvise_collapse and khugepaged
>>> Patch 3: A minor "fix"/optimization
>>> Patch 4: Refactor/rename hpage_collapse
>>> Patch 5-7: Generalize khugepaged functions for arbitrary orders
>>> Patch 8-11: The mTHP patches
>>>
>>> This series acts as an alternative to Dev Jain's approach [1]. The two
>>> series differ in a few ways:
>>> - My approach uses a bitmap to store the state of the linear scan_pmd to
>>> then determine potential mTHP batches. Devs incorporates his directly
>>> into the scan, and will try each available order.
>>> - Dev is attempting to optimize the locking, while my approach keeps the
>>> locking changes to a minimum. I believe his changes are not safe for
>>> uffd.
>>> - Dev's changes only work for khugepaged not madvise_collapse (although
>>> i think that was by choice and it could easily support madvise)
>>> - Dev scales all khugepaged sysfs tunables by order, while im removing
>>> the restriction of max_ptes_none and converting it to a scale to
>>> determine a (m)THP threshold.
>>> - Dev turns on khugepaged if any order is available while mine still
>>> only runs if PMDs are enabled. I like Dev's approach and will most
>>> likely do the same in my PATCH posting.
>>> - mTHPs need their ref count updated to 1<<order, which Dev is missing.
>>>
>>> Patch 11 was inspired by one of Dev's changes.
>>>
>>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20241216165105.56185-1-dev.jain@arm.com/
>>>
>>> Nico Pache (11):
>>> introduce khugepaged_collapse_single_pmd to collapse a single pmd
>>> khugepaged: refactor madvise_collapse and khugepaged_scan_mm_slot
>>> khugepaged: Don't allocate khugepaged mm_slot early
>>> khugepaged: rename hpage_collapse_* to khugepaged_*
>>> khugepaged: generalize hugepage_vma_revalidate for mTHP support
>>> khugepaged: generalize alloc_charge_folio for mTHP support
>>> khugepaged: generalize __collapse_huge_page_* for mTHP support
>>> khugepaged: introduce khugepaged_scan_bitmap for mTHP support
>>> khugepaged: add mTHP support
>>> khugepaged: remove max_ptes_none restriction on the pmd scan
>>> khugepaged: skip collapsing mTHP to smaller orders
>>>
>>> include/linux/khugepaged.h | 4 +-
>>> mm/huge_memory.c | 3 +-
>>> mm/khugepaged.c | 436 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
>>> 3 files changed, 306 insertions(+), 137 deletions(-)
>>
>> Before I take a proper look at your series, can you please include any testing
>> you may have done?
>
> I Built these changes for the following arches: x86_64, arm64,
> arm64-64k, ppc64le, s390x
>
> x86 testing:
> - Selftests mm
> - some stress-ng tests
> - compile kernel
> - I did some tests with my defer [1] set on top. This pushes all the
> work to khugepaged, which removes the noise of all the PF allocations.
>
> I recently got an ARM64 machine and did some simple sanity tests (on
> both 4k and 64k) like selftests, stress-ng, and playing around with
> the tunables, etc.
>
> I will also be running all the builds through our CI, and perf testing
> environments before posting.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240729222727.64319-1-npache@redhat.com/
>
>>
>
I tested your series with the program I was using and it is not working;
can you please confirm it.
diff --git a/mytests/mthp.c b/mytests/mthp.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..e3029dbcf035
--- /dev/null
+++ b/mytests/mthp.c
@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+/*
+ *
+ * Author: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
+ *
+ * Program to test khugepaged mTHP collapse
+ */
+
+#include <unistd.h>
+#include <sys/ioctl.h>
+#include <string.h>
+#include <stdint.h>
+#include <stdlib.h>
+#include <stdio.h>
+#include <stdlib.h>
+#include <sys/mman.h>
+#include <sys/time.h>
+#include <sys/random.h>
+#include <assert.h>
+
+int main(int argc, char *argv[])
+{
+ char *ptr;
+ unsigned long mthp_size = (1UL << 16);
+ size_t chunk_size = (1UL << 25);
+
+ ptr = mmap((void *)(1UL << 30), chunk_size, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,
+ MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0);
+ if (((unsigned long)ptr) != (1UL << 30)) {
+ printf("mmap did not work on required address\n");
+ return 1;
+ }
+
+ /* Fill first pte in every 64K interval */
+ for (int i = 0; i < chunk_size; i += mthp_size)
+ ptr[i] = i;
+
+ if (madvise(ptr, chunk_size, MADV_HUGEPAGE)) {
+ perror("madvise");
+ return 1;
+ }
+ sleep(100);
+ return 0;
+}
--
2.30.2
Set enabled = madvise, hugepages-2048k/enabled = hugepages-64k/enabled =
inherit. Run the program in the background, then run tools/mm/thpmaps.
You will see PMD collapse correctly, but when you echo never into
hugepages-2048k/enabled and test this again, you won't see contpte 64K
collapse. With my series, you will see something like
anon-cont-pte-aligned-64kB : 32768 kB (100%).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-10 4:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-08 23:31 Nico Pache
2025-01-08 23:31 ` [RFC 01/11] introduce khugepaged_collapse_single_pmd to collapse a single pmd Nico Pache
2025-01-10 6:25 ` Dev Jain
2025-01-08 23:31 ` [RFC 02/11] khugepaged: refactor madvise_collapse and khugepaged_scan_mm_slot Nico Pache
2025-01-08 23:31 ` [RFC 03/11] khugepaged: Don't allocate khugepaged mm_slot early Nico Pache
2025-01-10 6:11 ` Dev Jain
2025-01-10 19:37 ` Nico Pache
2025-01-08 23:31 ` [RFC 04/11] khugepaged: rename hpage_collapse_* to khugepaged_* Nico Pache
2025-01-08 23:31 ` [RFC 05/11] khugepaged: generalize hugepage_vma_revalidate for mTHP support Nico Pache
2025-01-08 23:31 ` [RFC 06/11] khugepaged: generalize alloc_charge_folio " Nico Pache
2025-01-10 6:23 ` Dev Jain
2025-01-10 19:41 ` Nico Pache
2025-01-08 23:31 ` [RFC 07/11] khugepaged: generalize __collapse_huge_page_* " Nico Pache
2025-01-10 6:38 ` Dev Jain
2025-01-08 23:31 ` [RFC 08/11] khugepaged: introduce khugepaged_scan_bitmap " Nico Pache
2025-01-10 9:05 ` Dev Jain
2025-01-10 21:48 ` Nico Pache
2025-01-12 11:23 ` Dev Jain
2025-01-13 22:25 ` Nico Pache
2025-01-10 14:54 ` Dev Jain
2025-01-10 21:48 ` Nico Pache
2025-01-12 15:13 ` Dev Jain
2025-01-12 16:41 ` Dev Jain
2025-01-08 23:31 ` [RFC 09/11] khugepaged: add " Nico Pache
2025-01-10 9:20 ` Dev Jain
2025-01-10 13:36 ` Dev Jain
2025-01-08 23:31 ` [RFC 10/11] khugepaged: remove max_ptes_none restriction on the pmd scan Nico Pache
2025-01-08 23:31 ` [RFC 11/11] khugepaged: skip collapsing mTHP to smaller orders Nico Pache
2025-01-09 6:22 ` [RFC 00/11] khugepaged: mTHP support Dev Jain
2025-01-10 2:27 ` Nico Pache
2025-01-10 4:56 ` Dev Jain [this message]
2025-01-10 22:01 ` Nico Pache
2025-01-12 14:11 ` Dev Jain
2025-01-13 23:00 ` Nico Pache
2025-01-09 6:27 ` Dev Jain
2025-01-10 1:28 ` Nico Pache
2025-01-16 9:47 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-01-16 20:53 ` Nico Pache
2025-01-20 5:17 ` Dev Jain
2025-01-23 20:24 ` Nico Pache
2025-01-24 7:13 ` Dev Jain
2025-01-24 7:38 ` Dev Jain
2025-01-20 12:49 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-01-23 20:42 ` Nico Pache
2025-01-20 12:54 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-01-20 13:37 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-01-20 13:56 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-01-20 16:27 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-01-20 18:39 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-01-21 9:48 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-01-21 10:19 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-01-27 9:31 ` Dev Jain
2025-01-22 5:18 ` Dev Jain
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4ab296ec-5dd2-4d1f-a823-29396cade93e@arm.com \
--to=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=21cnbao@gmail.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
--cc=audra@redhat.com \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=cl@gentwo.org \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=haowenchao22@gmail.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=ioworker0@gmail.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jglisse@google.com \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=npache@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=raquini@redhat.com \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=srivatsa@csail.mit.edu \
--cc=sunnanyong@huawei.com \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=usamaarif642@gmail.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=vishal.moola@gmail.com \
--cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=yang@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
--cc=zokeefe@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox