Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] selftests/mm: add tests for HWPOISON hugetlbfs read

["Linux regression tracking #update (Thorsten Leemhuis)" <regressions@leemhuis.info>]

On 12.01.24 07:16, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
> On 1/10/24 3:15 PM, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
>> On 1/10/24 11:49 AM, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
>>> On 1/6/24 2:13 AM, Jiaqi Yan wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Jan 4, 2024 at 10:27 PM Muhammad Usama Anjum
>>>> <usama.anjum@collabora.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm trying to convert this test to TAP as I think the failures sometimes go
>>>>> unnoticed on CI systems if we only depend on the return value of the
>>>>> application. I've enabled the following configurations which aren't already
>>>>> present in tools/testing/selftests/mm/config:
>>>>> CONFIG_MEMORY_FAILURE=y
>>>>> CONFIG_HWPOISON_INJECT=m

> #regzbot title: hugetlbfs hwpoison handling
> #regzbot introduced: a08c7193e4f1
> #regzbot monitor:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240111191655.295530-1-sidhartha.kumar@oracle.com

#regzbot fix: fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c: mm/memory-failure.c: fix hugetlbfs
hwpoison handling
#regzbot ignore-activity

Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat)
--
Everything you wanna know about Linux kernel regression tracking:
https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/about/#tldr
That page also explains what to do if mails like this annoy you.