From: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
rientjes@google.com, liuj97@gmail.com, len.brown@intel.com,
benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org, cl@linux.com,
minchan.kim@gmail.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, wency@cn.fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 3/13] memory-hotplug : unify argument of firmware_map_add_early/hotplug
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 13:52:38 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FFE5816.6070102@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FFD9C08.2070502@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Hi Dave,
2012/07/12 0:30, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 07/09/2012 03:25 AM, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
>> @@ -642,7 +642,7 @@ int __ref add_memory(int nid, u64 start,
>> }
>>
>> /* create new memmap entry */
>> - firmware_map_add_hotplug(start, start + size, "System RAM");
>> + firmware_map_add_hotplug(start, start + size - 1, "System RAM");
>
> I know the firmware_map_*() calls use inclusive end addresses
> internally, but do we really need to expose them? Both of the callers
> you mentioned do:
>
> firmware_map_add_hotplug(start, start + size - 1, "System RAM");
>
> or
>
> firmware_map_add_early(entry->addr,
> entry->addr + entry->size - 1,
> e820_type_to_string(entry->type));
>
> So it seems a _bit_ silly to keep all of the callers doing this size-1
> thing. I also noted that the new caller that you added does the same
> thing. Could we just change the external calling convention to be
> exclusive?
Thank you for your comment.
Does the following patch include your comment? If O.K., I will separate
the patch from the series and send it for bug fix.
---
arch/x86/kernel/e820.c | 2 +-
drivers/firmware/memmap.c | 8 ++++----
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Index: linux-next/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
===================================================================
--- linux-next.orig/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c 2012-07-02 09:50:23.000000000 +0900
+++ linux-next/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c 2012-07-12 13:30:45.942318179 +0900
@@ -944,7 +944,7 @@
for (i = 0; i < e820_saved.nr_map; i++) {
struct e820entry *entry = &e820_saved.map[i];
firmware_map_add_early(entry->addr,
- entry->addr + entry->size - 1,
+ entry->addr + entry->size,
e820_type_to_string(entry->type));
}
}
Index: linux-next/drivers/firmware/memmap.c
===================================================================
--- linux-next.orig/drivers/firmware/memmap.c 2012-07-02 09:50:26.000000000 +0900
+++ linux-next/drivers/firmware/memmap.c 2012-07-12 13:40:53.823318481 +0900
@@ -98,7 +98,7 @@
/**
* firmware_map_add_entry() - Does the real work to add a firmware memmap entry.
* @start: Start of the memory range.
- * @end: End of the memory range (inclusive).
+ * @end: End of the memory range.
* @type: Type of the memory range.
* @entry: Pre-allocated (either kmalloc() or bootmem allocator), uninitialised
* entry.
@@ -113,7 +113,7 @@
BUG_ON(start > end);
entry->start = start;
- entry->end = end;
+ entry->end = end - 1;
entry->type = type;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&entry->list);
kobject_init(&entry->kobj, &memmap_ktype);
@@ -148,7 +148,7 @@
* firmware_map_add_hotplug() - Adds a firmware mapping entry when we do
* memory hotplug.
* @start: Start of the memory range.
- * @end: End of the memory range (inclusive).
+ * @end: End of the memory range.
* @type: Type of the memory range.
*
* Adds a firmware mapping entry. This function is for memory hotplug, it is
@@ -175,7 +175,7 @@
/**
* firmware_map_add_early() - Adds a firmware mapping entry.
* @start: Start of the memory range.
- * @end: End of the memory range (inclusive).
+ * @end: End of the memory range.
* @type: Type of the memory range.
*
* Adds a firmware mapping entry. This function uses the bootmem allocator
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-12 4:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-09 10:21 [RFC PATCH v3 0/13] memory-hotplug : hot-remove physical memory Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-07-09 10:23 ` [RFC PATCH v3 1/13] memory-hotplug : rename remove_memory to offline_memory Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-07-09 10:24 ` [RFC PATCH v3 2/13] memory-hotplug : add physical memory hotplug code to acpi_memory_device_remove Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-07-13 3:26 ` Wen Congyang
2012-07-17 0:46 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-07-13 3:35 ` Wen Congyang
2012-07-17 1:44 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-07-17 1:54 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-07-17 2:32 ` Wen Congyang
2012-07-17 3:08 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-07-17 3:32 ` Wen Congyang
2012-07-17 4:51 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-07-17 5:17 ` Wen Congyang
2012-07-17 5:19 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-07-13 10:40 ` Wen Congyang
2012-07-17 1:10 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-07-09 10:25 ` [RFC PATCH v3 3/13] memory-hotplug : unify argument of firmware_map_add_early/hotplug Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-07-11 15:30 ` Dave Hansen
2012-07-12 4:52 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu [this message]
2012-07-12 13:40 ` Dave Hansen
2012-07-13 4:34 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-07-13 5:11 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-07-09 10:26 ` [RFC PATCH v3 4/13] memory-hotplug : remove /sys/firmware/memmap/X sysfs Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-07-13 9:10 ` Wen Congyang
2012-07-17 0:28 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-07-16 2:32 ` Wen Congyang
2012-07-17 0:30 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-07-09 10:26 ` [RFC PATCH v3 5/13] memory-hotplug : does not release memory region in PAGES_PER_SECTION chunks Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-07-13 3:42 ` Wen Congyang
2012-07-09 10:27 ` [RFC PATCH v3 6/13] memory-hotplug : add memory_block_release Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-07-09 10:28 ` [RFC PATCH v3 7/13] memory-hotplug : remove_memory calls __remove_pages Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-07-09 10:29 ` [RFC PATCH v3 8/13] memory-hotplug : check page type in get_page_bootmem Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-07-09 10:30 ` [RFC PATCH v3 9/13] memory-hotplug : move register_page_bootmem_info_node and put_page_bootmem for sparse-vmemmap Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-07-09 10:32 ` [RFC PATCH v3 10/13] memory-hotplug : implement register_page_bootmem_info_section of sparse-vmemmap Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-07-09 10:33 ` [RFC PATCH v3 11/13] memory-hotplug : free memmap " Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-07-11 5:06 ` Wen Congyang
2012-07-11 5:52 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-07-11 6:25 ` Wen Congyang
2012-07-11 6:48 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-07-11 7:27 ` Wen Congyang
2012-07-09 10:34 ` [RFC PATCH v3 12/13] memory-hotplug : add node_device_release Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-07-09 10:35 ` [RFC PATCH v3 13/13] memory-hotplug : remove sysfs file of node Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-07-09 15:18 ` [RFC PATCH v3 0/13] memory-hotplug : hot-remove physical memory Christoph Lameter
2012-07-10 9:58 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-07-10 16:50 ` Jiang Liu
2012-07-11 0:09 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-07-11 0:21 ` Jiang Liu
2012-07-11 0:54 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-07-11 14:24 ` Jiang Liu
2012-07-11 1:52 ` Wen Congyang
2012-07-11 2:24 ` Wen Congyang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FFE5816.6070102@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=liuj97@gmail.com \
--cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=wency@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox