From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx195.postini.com [74.125.245.195]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 89E116B0071 for ; Wed, 4 Jul 2012 05:42:57 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4FF40F79.60901@parallels.com> Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2012 13:40:09 +0400 From: Glauber Costa MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] memcg: add res_counter_usage_safe() References: <4FF3B0DC.5090508@jp.fujitsu.com> <20120704091428.GB7881@cmpxchg.org> <4FF40D33.4030704@jp.fujitsu.com> In-Reply-To: <4FF40D33.4030704@jp.fujitsu.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Kamezawa Hiroyuki Cc: Johannes Weiner , linux-mm , David Rientjes , Andrew Morton , Michal Hocko , Tejun Heo On 07/04/2012 01:30 PM, Kamezawa Hiroyuki wrote: >> > > I think asking applications to handle usage > limit case will cause > trouble and we can keep simple interface by lying here. And, > applications doesn't need to handle this case. > > From the viewpoint of our enterprise service, it's better to keep > usage <= limit for avoiding unnecessary, unimportant, troubles. > > Thanks, > -Kame One thing to keep in mind, is that usage is already a lie. Mostly because of batching. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org