Re: [RFC PATCH 2/12] memory-hogplug : check memory offline in offline_pages

[Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>]

Hi Kosaki-san,

2012/06/28 14:27, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 1:06 AM, Yasuaki Ishimatsu
> <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>> Hi Wen,
>>
>> 2012/06/27 17:49, Wen Congyang wrote:
>>> At 06/27/2012 01:44 PM, Yasuaki Ishimatsu Wrote:
>>>> When offline_pages() is called to offlined memory, the function fails since
>>>> all memory has been offlined. In this case, the function should succeed.
>>>> The patch adds the check function into offline_pages().
>>>
>>> You miss such case: some pages are online, while some pages are offline.
>>> offline_pages() will fail too in such case.
>>
>> You are right. But current code fails, when the function is called to offline
>> memory. In this case, the function should succeed. So the patch confirms
>> whether the memory was offlined or not. And if memory has already been
>> offlined, offline_pages return 0.
>
> Can you please explain why the caller can't check it? I hope to avoid
> an ignorance
> as far as we can.

Of course, caller side can check it. But there is a possibility that
offline_pages() is called by many functions. So I do not think that it
is good that all functions which call offline_pages() check it.

Thanks,
Yasuaki Ishimatsu

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>