linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [patch] mm, thp: abort compaction if migration page cannot be charged to memcg
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 16:40:45 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FE8CCCD.7080503@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1206202351030.28770@chino.kir.corp.google.com>

On 06/21/2012 02:52 AM, David Rientjes wrote:
> If page migration cannot charge the new page to the memcg,
> migrate_pages() will return -ENOMEM.  This isn't considered in memory
> compaction however, and the loop continues to iterate over all pageblocks
> trying in a futile attempt to continue migrations which are only bound to
> fail.
>
> This will short circuit and fail memory compaction if migrate_pages()
> returns -ENOMEM.  COMPACT_PARTIAL is returned in case some migrations
> were successful so that the page allocator will retry.

The patch makes sense, however I wonder if it would make
more sense in the long run to allow migrate/compaction to
temporarily exceed the memcg memory limit for a cgroup,
because the original page will get freed again soon anyway.

That has the potential to improve compaction success, and
reduce compaction related CPU use.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-06-25 20:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-06-21  6:52 David Rientjes
2012-06-21  8:11 ` Minchan Kim
2012-06-21  8:30   ` David Rientjes
2012-06-21  9:01     ` David Rientjes
2012-06-21 10:05       ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-06-21 10:16         ` David Rientjes
2012-06-21  9:32 ` Mel Gorman
2012-06-21  9:57   ` David Rientjes
2012-06-25 20:40 ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2012-06-26  0:32   ` David Rientjes
2012-06-26  3:11     ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4FE8CCCD.7080503@redhat.com \
    --to=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=minchan@kernel.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox