From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>
Cc: cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devel@openvz.org,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>,
Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@google.com>,
Suleiman Souhlal <ssouhlal@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/23] memcg: Reclaim when more than one page needed.
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 10:16:42 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F97507A.60204@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1334959051-18203-6-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com>
(2012/04/21 6:57), Glauber Costa wrote:
> From: Suleiman Souhlal <ssouhlal@FreeBSD.org>
>
> mem_cgroup_do_charge() was written before slab accounting, and expects
> three cases: being called for 1 page, being called for a stock of 32 pages,
> or being called for a hugepage. If we call for 2 pages (and several slabs
> used in process creation are such, at least with the debug options I had),
> it assumed it's being called for stock and just retried without reclaiming.
>
> Fix that by passing down a minsize argument in addition to the csize.
>
> And what to do about that (csize == PAGE_SIZE && ret) retry? If it's
> needed at all (and presumably is since it's there, perhaps to handle
> races), then it should be extended to more than PAGE_SIZE, yet how far?
IIRC, it was for preventing rapid OOM kill and reducing latency.
> And should there be a retry count limit, of what? For now retry up to
> COSTLY_ORDER (as page_alloc.c does), stay safe with a cond_resched(),
> and make sure not to do it if __GFP_NORETRY.
>
> Signed-off-by: Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@google.com>
Hmm, maybe ok.
Reviewed-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
> ---
> mm/memcontrol.c | 18 +++++++++++-------
> 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index 4b94b2d..cbffc4c 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -2187,7 +2187,8 @@ enum {
> };
>
> static int mem_cgroup_do_charge(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, gfp_t gfp_mask,
> - unsigned int nr_pages, bool oom_check)
> + unsigned int nr_pages, unsigned int min_pages,
> + bool oom_check)
> {
> unsigned long csize = nr_pages * PAGE_SIZE;
> struct mem_cgroup *mem_over_limit;
> @@ -2210,18 +2211,18 @@ static int mem_cgroup_do_charge(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, gfp_t gfp_mask,
> } else
> mem_over_limit = mem_cgroup_from_res_counter(fail_res, res);
> /*
> - * nr_pages can be either a huge page (HPAGE_PMD_NR), a batch
> - * of regular pages (CHARGE_BATCH), or a single regular page (1).
> - *
> * Never reclaim on behalf of optional batching, retry with a
> * single page instead.
> */
> - if (nr_pages == CHARGE_BATCH)
> + if (nr_pages > min_pages)
> return CHARGE_RETRY;
>
> if (!(gfp_mask & __GFP_WAIT))
> return CHARGE_WOULDBLOCK;
>
> + if (gfp_mask & __GFP_NORETRY)
> + return CHARGE_NOMEM;
> +
> ret = mem_cgroup_reclaim(mem_over_limit, gfp_mask, flags);
> if (mem_cgroup_margin(mem_over_limit) >= nr_pages)
> return CHARGE_RETRY;
> @@ -2234,8 +2235,10 @@ static int mem_cgroup_do_charge(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, gfp_t gfp_mask,
> * unlikely to succeed so close to the limit, and we fall back
> * to regular pages anyway in case of failure.
> */
> - if (nr_pages == 1 && ret)
> + if (nr_pages <= (PAGE_SIZE << PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER) && ret) {
> + cond_resched();
> return CHARGE_RETRY;
> + }
>
> /*
> * At task move, charge accounts can be doubly counted. So, it's
> @@ -2369,7 +2372,8 @@ again:
> nr_oom_retries = MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_RETRIES;
> }
>
> - ret = mem_cgroup_do_charge(memcg, gfp_mask, batch, oom_check);
> + ret = mem_cgroup_do_charge(memcg, gfp_mask, batch, nr_pages,
> + oom_check);
> switch (ret) {
> case CHARGE_OK:
> break;
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-25 1:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 71+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-20 21:57 [PATCH 00/23] slab+slub accounting for memcg Glauber Costa
2012-04-20 21:57 ` [PATCH 01/23] slub: don't create a copy of the name string in kmem_cache_create Glauber Costa
2012-04-20 21:57 ` [PATCH 02/23] slub: always get the cache from its page in kfree Glauber Costa
2012-04-20 21:57 ` [PATCH 03/23] slab: rename gfpflags to allocflags Glauber Costa
2012-04-20 21:57 ` [PATCH 04/23] memcg: Make it possible to use the stock for more than one page Glauber Costa
2012-04-25 0:59 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-20 21:57 ` [PATCH 05/23] memcg: Reclaim when more than one page needed Glauber Costa
2012-04-25 1:16 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [this message]
2012-04-20 21:57 ` [PATCH 06/23] slab: use obj_size field of struct kmem_cache when not debugging Glauber Costa
2012-04-20 21:57 ` [PATCH 07/23] change defines to an enum Glauber Costa
2012-04-25 1:18 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-20 21:57 ` [PATCH 08/23] don't force return value checking in res_counter_charge_nofail Glauber Costa
2012-04-25 1:28 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-20 21:57 ` [PATCH 09/23] kmem slab accounting basic infrastructure Glauber Costa
2012-04-25 1:32 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-25 14:38 ` Glauber Costa
2012-04-26 0:08 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-30 19:33 ` Suleiman Souhlal
2012-05-02 15:15 ` Glauber Costa
2012-04-20 21:57 ` [PATCH 10/23] slab/slub: struct memcg_params Glauber Costa
2012-04-30 19:42 ` Suleiman Souhlal
2012-04-20 21:57 ` [PATCH 11/23] slub: consider a memcg parameter in kmem_create_cache Glauber Costa
2012-04-24 14:03 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-04-24 14:27 ` Glauber Costa
2012-04-25 1:38 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-25 14:37 ` Glauber Costa
2012-04-30 19:51 ` Suleiman Souhlal
2012-05-02 15:18 ` Glauber Costa
2012-04-22 23:53 ` [PATCH 12/23] slab: pass memcg parameter to kmem_cache_create Glauber Costa
2012-04-30 19:54 ` Suleiman Souhlal
2012-04-22 23:53 ` [PATCH 13/23] slub: create duplicate cache Glauber Costa
2012-04-24 14:18 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-04-24 14:37 ` Glauber Costa
2012-04-26 13:10 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-04-30 20:15 ` Suleiman Souhlal
2012-04-22 23:53 ` [PATCH 14/23] slub: provide kmalloc_no_account Glauber Costa
2012-04-22 23:53 ` [PATCH 15/23] slab: create duplicate cache Glauber Costa
2012-04-22 23:53 ` [PATCH 16/23] slab: provide kmalloc_no_account Glauber Costa
2012-04-25 1:44 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-25 14:29 ` Glauber Costa
2012-04-26 0:13 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-22 23:53 ` [PATCH 17/23] kmem controller charge/uncharge infrastructure Glauber Costa
2012-04-23 22:25 ` David Rientjes
2012-04-24 14:22 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-04-24 14:40 ` Glauber Costa
2012-04-24 20:25 ` David Rientjes
2012-04-24 21:36 ` Glauber Costa
2012-04-24 22:54 ` David Rientjes
2012-04-25 14:43 ` Glauber Costa
2012-04-24 20:21 ` David Rientjes
2012-04-27 11:38 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-04-27 18:13 ` David Rientjes
2012-04-25 1:56 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-25 14:44 ` Glauber Costa
2012-04-27 12:22 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-04-30 20:56 ` Suleiman Souhlal
2012-05-02 15:34 ` Glauber Costa
2012-04-22 23:53 ` [PATCH 18/23] slub: charge allocation to a memcg Glauber Costa
2012-04-22 23:53 ` [PATCH 19/23] slab: per-memcg accounting of slab caches Glauber Costa
2012-04-30 21:25 ` Suleiman Souhlal
2012-05-02 15:40 ` Glauber Costa
2012-04-22 23:53 ` [PATCH 20/23] memcg: disable kmem code when not in use Glauber Costa
2012-04-22 23:53 ` [PATCH 21/23] memcg: Track all the memcg children of a kmem_cache Glauber Costa
2012-04-22 23:53 ` [PATCH 22/23] memcg: Per-memcg memory.kmem.slabinfo file Glauber Costa
2012-04-22 23:53 ` [PATCH 23/23] slub: create slabinfo file for memcg Glauber Costa
2012-04-22 23:59 ` [PATCH 00/23] slab+slub accounting " Glauber Costa
2012-04-30 9:59 ` [PATCH 0/3] A few fixes for '[PATCH 00/23] slab+slub accounting for memcg' series Anton Vorontsov
2012-04-30 10:01 ` [PATCH 1/3] slab: Proper off-slabs handling when duplicating caches Anton Vorontsov
2012-04-30 10:01 ` [PATCH 2/3] slab: Fix imbalanced rcu locking Anton Vorontsov
2012-04-30 10:02 ` [PATCH 3/3] slab: Get rid of mem_cgroup_put_kmem_cache() Anton Vorontsov
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-04-20 21:48 [PATCH 00/23] slab+slub accounting for memcg Glauber Costa
2012-04-20 21:49 ` [PATCH 05/23] memcg: Reclaim when more than one page needed Glauber Costa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F97507A.60204@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=devel@openvz.org \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=glommer@parallels.com \
--cc=gthelen@google.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=ssouhlal@FreeBSD.org \
--cc=suleiman@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox