linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <jweiner@redhat.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [patch] thp, memcg: split hugepage for memcg oom on cow
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 09:49:09 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F838385.9070309@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1204031854530.30629@chino.kir.corp.google.com>

(2012/04/04 10:56), David Rientjes wrote:

> On COW, a new hugepage is allocated and charged to the memcg.  If the
> memcg is oom, however, this charge will fail and will return VM_FAULT_OOM
> to the page fault handler which results in an oom kill.
> 
> Instead, it's possible to fallback to splitting the hugepage so that the
> COW results only in an order-0 page being charged to the memcg which has
> a higher liklihood to succeed.  This is expensive because the hugepage
> must be split in the page fault handler, but it is much better than
> unnecessarily oom killing a process.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
> ---
>  mm/huge_memory.c |    1 +
>  mm/memory.c      |   18 +++++++++++++++---
>  2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
> --- a/mm/huge_memory.c
> +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
> @@ -959,6 +959,7 @@ int do_huge_pmd_wp_page(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>  
>  	if (unlikely(mem_cgroup_newpage_charge(new_page, mm, GFP_KERNEL))) {
>  		put_page(new_page);
> +		split_huge_page(page);
>  		put_page(page);
>  		ret |= VM_FAULT_OOM;
>  		goto out;
> diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
> --- a/mm/memory.c
> +++ b/mm/memory.c
> @@ -3489,6 +3489,7 @@ int handle_mm_fault(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>  	if (unlikely(is_vm_hugetlb_page(vma)))
>  		return hugetlb_fault(mm, vma, address, flags);
>  
> +retry:
>  	pgd = pgd_offset(mm, address);
>  	pud = pud_alloc(mm, pgd, address);
>  	if (!pud)
> @@ -3502,13 +3503,24 @@ int handle_mm_fault(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>  							  pmd, flags);
>  	} else {
>  		pmd_t orig_pmd = *pmd;
> +		int ret;
> +
>  		barrier();
>  		if (pmd_trans_huge(orig_pmd)) {
>  			if (flags & FAULT_FLAG_WRITE &&
>  			    !pmd_write(orig_pmd) &&
> -			    !pmd_trans_splitting(orig_pmd))
> -				return do_huge_pmd_wp_page(mm, vma, address,
> -							   pmd, orig_pmd);
> +			    !pmd_trans_splitting(orig_pmd)) {
> +				ret = do_huge_pmd_wp_page(mm, vma, address, pmd,
> +							  orig_pmd);
> +				/*
> +				 * If COW results in an oom memcg, the huge pmd
> +				 * will already have been split, so retry the
> +				 * fault on the pte for a smaller charge.
> +				 */


IIUC, do_huge_pmd_wp_page_fallback() can return VM_FAULT_OOM. So, this check
is not related only to memcg.

> +				if (unlikely(ret & VM_FAULT_OOM))
> +					goto retry;
> +				return ret;
> +			}
>  			return 0;


Anyway, seems reasonable to me.

Reviewed-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>


--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-04-10  0:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-04-04  1:56 David Rientjes
2012-04-09  9:10 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-10  0:23   ` David Rientjes
2012-04-10  0:43     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-10  0:49 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [this message]
2012-04-10  5:41   ` David Rientjes
2012-04-10  5:42     ` [patch v2] " David Rientjes
2012-04-10  5:59       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-11 14:20       ` Johannes Weiner
2012-04-23 23:15         ` David Rientjes
2012-04-25 21:01           ` David Rientjes
2012-04-26  9:06           ` Johannes Weiner
2012-04-26 21:05             ` David Rientjes
2012-04-27  0:15               ` Johannes Weiner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F838385.9070309@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --to=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jweiner@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox