From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Johannes Weiner <jweiner@redhat.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [patch] thp, memcg: split hugepage for memcg oom on cow
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 09:49:09 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F838385.9070309@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1204031854530.30629@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
(2012/04/04 10:56), David Rientjes wrote:
> On COW, a new hugepage is allocated and charged to the memcg. If the
> memcg is oom, however, this charge will fail and will return VM_FAULT_OOM
> to the page fault handler which results in an oom kill.
>
> Instead, it's possible to fallback to splitting the hugepage so that the
> COW results only in an order-0 page being charged to the memcg which has
> a higher liklihood to succeed. This is expensive because the hugepage
> must be split in the page fault handler, but it is much better than
> unnecessarily oom killing a process.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
> ---
> mm/huge_memory.c | 1 +
> mm/memory.c | 18 +++++++++++++++---
> 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
> --- a/mm/huge_memory.c
> +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
> @@ -959,6 +959,7 @@ int do_huge_pmd_wp_page(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>
> if (unlikely(mem_cgroup_newpage_charge(new_page, mm, GFP_KERNEL))) {
> put_page(new_page);
> + split_huge_page(page);
> put_page(page);
> ret |= VM_FAULT_OOM;
> goto out;
> diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
> --- a/mm/memory.c
> +++ b/mm/memory.c
> @@ -3489,6 +3489,7 @@ int handle_mm_fault(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> if (unlikely(is_vm_hugetlb_page(vma)))
> return hugetlb_fault(mm, vma, address, flags);
>
> +retry:
> pgd = pgd_offset(mm, address);
> pud = pud_alloc(mm, pgd, address);
> if (!pud)
> @@ -3502,13 +3503,24 @@ int handle_mm_fault(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> pmd, flags);
> } else {
> pmd_t orig_pmd = *pmd;
> + int ret;
> +
> barrier();
> if (pmd_trans_huge(orig_pmd)) {
> if (flags & FAULT_FLAG_WRITE &&
> !pmd_write(orig_pmd) &&
> - !pmd_trans_splitting(orig_pmd))
> - return do_huge_pmd_wp_page(mm, vma, address,
> - pmd, orig_pmd);
> + !pmd_trans_splitting(orig_pmd)) {
> + ret = do_huge_pmd_wp_page(mm, vma, address, pmd,
> + orig_pmd);
> + /*
> + * If COW results in an oom memcg, the huge pmd
> + * will already have been split, so retry the
> + * fault on the pte for a smaller charge.
> + */
IIUC, do_huge_pmd_wp_page_fallback() can return VM_FAULT_OOM. So, this check
is not related only to memcg.
> + if (unlikely(ret & VM_FAULT_OOM))
> + goto retry;
> + return ret;
> + }
> return 0;
Anyway, seems reasonable to me.
Reviewed-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-10 0:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-04 1:56 David Rientjes
2012-04-09 9:10 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-10 0:23 ` David Rientjes
2012-04-10 0:43 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-10 0:49 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [this message]
2012-04-10 5:41 ` David Rientjes
2012-04-10 5:42 ` [patch v2] " David Rientjes
2012-04-10 5:59 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-11 14:20 ` Johannes Weiner
2012-04-23 23:15 ` David Rientjes
2012-04-25 21:01 ` David Rientjes
2012-04-26 9:06 ` Johannes Weiner
2012-04-26 21:05 ` David Rientjes
2012-04-27 0:15 ` Johannes Weiner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F838385.9070309@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jweiner@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox